Author
Listed:
- Mohd Elfee Ab Rashid
(Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM Negeri Sembilan, Seremban Campus)
- Nur Fadhlina Zainal Abedin
(Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM Negeri Sembilan, Seremban Campus)
- Faridah Pardi
(Faculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM Negeri Sembilan, Seremban Campus)
- Dalia Attan
(Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, UiTM Negeri Sembilan, Seremban Campus)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced all institutions to migrate from conventional face-to-face to online platforms. After the pandemic, some institutions are still implementing fully online, while others use blended learning and fully transition back to face-to-face. However, studies have reported on the differences in the effectiveness and preferences of these teaching methods. Therefore, this paper examines the students’ preferences between face-to-face and online learning environments and analyzes if there are differences among gender, study level, and place of residence for 202 students at the Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Seremban campus. The findings indicate that the majority of students selected blended learning as the preferred teaching method in the first rank, followed by face-to-face and online learning in second and third place, respectively. The findings also show that there are no significant differences between face-to-face and online learning environments for gender or study level. However, for the place of residence, the results show a significant difference in preferences between students who stay in college and those who are from outside the college.
Suggested Citation
Mohd Elfee Ab Rashid & Nur Fadhlina Zainal Abedin & Faridah Pardi & Dalia Attan, 2025.
"Face-To-Face and Online Learning Environment: Students’ Preferences and Differences among Gender, Study Level and Place of Residence,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3s), pages 747-754, January.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:3s:p:747-754
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:3s:p:747-754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.