IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i8p4213-4226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Literature Review on Adaptation of Infographic and Acceptance Factors in Summarizing Medical and Health Literature in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Khairul Azizi Ahmad

    (College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Malaysia)

  • Mohd Nasiruddin Abdul Aziz

    (College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Malaysia)

  • Mohd Khairulnizam Ramlie

    (College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Malaysia)

  • Ashraf Abdul Rahaman

    (College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Abdullah

    (College of Creative Arts, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Perak Branch, 32610 Seri Iskandar, Perak Malaysia)

Abstract

Infographics are visual representations of information in such a way that information can be easily understood at a glance. Infographics are a form of the most powerful stimulator of visual communication in the digital era, and it is gaining popularity among educators. The creation of teaching and learning materials has become critical for students at all levels of education. However there are still insufficient studies that have systematically reviewed the existing literature on infographic acceptance in higher education. Therefore, this article is intended to conduct a systematic literature review on infographic acceptance in facilitating teaching and learning among students in higher education. The current study has combined multiple research designs, and the review was based on the ROSES publication standard (RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses). This study selected papers using two of the most prominent databases: Scopus and Science Direct, and it used Google Scholar as the secondary database. A thematic analysis was implemented and 4 main themes were produced, namely 1) Presentable and efficient; 2) understandable, 3) Visual literacy, and 4) Facilitating teaching and learning. The study made several significant contributions to the body of knowledge and for practical purposes. The findings have explained the importance of visual communication specifically infographics as a tool for facilitating teaching and learning process and for providing information on specific research areas and content that should be the focus of future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Khairul Azizi Ahmad & Mohd Nasiruddin Abdul Aziz & Mohd Khairulnizam Ramlie & Ashraf Abdul Rahaman & Muhammad Abdullah, 2024. "Systematic Literature Review on Adaptation of Infographic and Acceptance Factors in Summarizing Medical and Health Literature in Higher Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 4213-4226, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:8:p:4213-4226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-8/4213-4226.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/systematic-literature-review-on-adaptation-of-infographic-and-acceptance-factors-in-summarizing-medical-and-health-literature-in-higher-education/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Halevi, Gali & Moed, Henk & Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2017. "Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 823-834.
    2. Martín-Martín, Alberto & Orduna-Malea, Enrique & Thelwall, Mike & Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, 2018. "Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1160-1177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pantea Kamrani & Isabelle Dorsch & Wolfgang G. Stock, 2021. "Do researchers know what the h-index is? And how do they estimate its importance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 5489-5508, July.
    2. Perez-Vega, Rodrigo & Hopkinson, Paul & Singhal, Aishwarya & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "From CRM to social CRM: A bibliometric review and research agenda for consumer research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1-16.
    3. Vance Kite & Soonhye Park & Eric Wiebe, 2021. "The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    4. Maor Weinberger & Maayan Zhitomirsky-Geffet, 2021. "Diversity of success: measuring the scholarly performance diversity of tenured professors in the Israeli academia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2931-2970, April.
    5. Vivek Kumar Singh & Satya Swarup Srichandan & Hiran H. Lathabai, 2022. "ResearchGate and Google Scholar: how much do they differ in publications, citations and different metrics and why?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1515-1542, March.
    6. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    7. Michael Gusenbauer, 2019. "Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 177-214, January.
    8. Salim Moussa, 2021. "Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 485-506, January.
    9. Alberto Martín-Martín & Mike Thelwall & Enrique Orduna-Malea & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2021. "Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 871-906, January.
    10. Christian Schlögl & Sandra Boric & Gerhard Reichmann, 2024. "Publication and citation patterns of Austrian researchers in operations research and other sub-disciplines of business administration as indexed in Web of Science and Scopus," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 32(3), pages 711-736, September.
    11. Eitan Frachtenberg, 2022. "Multifactor Citation Analysis over Five Years: A Case Study of SIGMETRICS Papers," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, December.
    12. David Jancsics & Salvador Espinosa & Jonathan Carlos, 2023. "Organizational noncompliance: an interdisciplinary review of social and organizational factors," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 1273-1301, September.
    13. Jingqi Gao & Xiang Wu & Xiaowei Luo & Shukai Guan, 2021. "Scientometric Analysis of Safety Sign Research: 1990–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Cristina Robledo-Ardila & Juan Pablo Román-Calderón, 2022. "Potential: in search for meaning, theory and avenues for future research a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 149-186, February.
    15. Vivek Kumar Singh & Prashasti Singh & Mousumi Karmakar & Jacqueline Leta & Philipp Mayr, 2021. "The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5113-5142, June.
    16. Zoltán Lakner & Brigitta Plasek & Gyula Kasza & Anna Kiss & Sándor Soós & Ágoston Temesi, 2021. "Towards Understanding the Food Consumer Behavior–Food Safety–Sustainability Triangle: A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, November.
    17. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Anna Jasinenko & Josephina Steuber, 2023. "Perceived Organizational Purpose: Systematic Literature Review, Construct Definition, Measurement and Potential Employee Outcomes," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1415-1447, September.
    19. Ignacio Rodríguez-Rodríguez & José-Víctor Rodríguez & Niloofar Shirvanizadeh & Andrés Ortiz & Domingo-Javier Pardo-Quiles, 2021. "Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data and the Internet of Things to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scientometric Review Using Text Mining," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    20. Zoltán Krajcsák, 2021. "Researcher Performance in Scopus Articles ( RPSA ) as a New Scientometric Model of Scientific Output: Tested in Business Area of V4 Countries," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-23, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:8:p:4213-4226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.