IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i3sp6150-6164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Cognitive, Emotional and Psychomotor Processes of Critical Reading Skills: A Comparative Analysis of Fluent and Novice Readers

Author

Listed:
  • Shumaila Omar

    (Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Malaysia Social Sciences and Liberal Arts Department, Institute of Business Administration, Karachi, Pakistan)

  • Wan Nazihah Wan Mohamed

    (Akademi Pengajian Bahasa, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kelantan, Malaysia)

Abstract

Critical reading is a vital academic skill that involves carefully engaging with texts to explore the assumptions, arguments, and implications presented by authors. To fully grasp its importance, it is necessary to understand how critical thinking interacts with different dimensions of learning. Using Bloom’s Taxonomy as a framework, this approach evaluates students’ engagement with texts, ranging from basic recall to advanced cognitive skills, while considering the interplay between cognitive abilities, emotional involvement, and physical actions. Many students struggle with reading comprehension, particularly when reading academic texts in a second language. Consequently, this preliminary study is conducted to investigate how students engage with critical reading by examining their cognitive processes, emotional engagement, and psychomotor skills. A qualitative approach was applied to analyse the reading processes and behaviours of one fluent and one novice reader by using two reading passages with varied levels of complexity. Post-interview semi-structured interviews and observational notes recorded during the sessions were analysed to gain deeper insights into the participants’ experiences, strategies, and perceptions regarding the think-aloud process. The findings, analysed through the lens of Bloom’s Taxonomy across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, revealed that the fluent reader used more sophisticated strategies, such as analysing, synthesizing, and adapting complex information. In contrast, the novice relied on simpler methods, like repetition and contextual cues, to address comprehension difficulties. These results highlight the need for differentiated teaching strategies so that fluent readers benefit from tasks promoting higher-order thinking, while novice readers require structured support to enhance their analytical abilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shumaila Omar & Wan Nazihah Wan Mohamed, 2024. "Exploring Cognitive, Emotional and Psychomotor Processes of Critical Reading Skills: A Comparative Analysis of Fluent and Novice Readers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 6150-6164, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:6150-6164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-3s/6150-6164.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/exploring-cognitive-emotional-and-psychomotor-processes-of-critical-reading-skills-a-comparative-analysis-of-fluent-and-novice-readers/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raana Ramezani & Ebrahim Larsari & Mohammad Kiasi, 2016. "The Relationship between Critical Thinking and EFL Learners’ Speaking Ability," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 189-189, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen Huu Tai, 2022. "Students’ perceptions of applying critical thinking to learning and practicing English speaking skills," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 12(2), pages 135-146.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:6150-6164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.