IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i10p1788-1799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unravelling Complexity in Malaysian Life Insurance Policy Documents: The Questions of Readability and Lexical Density

Author

Listed:
  • Kamisah Ariffin

    (Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, Jengka Campus, 26400 Bandar Tun Abdul Razak, Pahang, Malaysia)

  • Khalid Mat Pardi

    (Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, Raub Campus, 27600 Raub, Pahang, Malaysia)

  • Noli Maishara Nordin

    (Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, Raub Campus, 27600 Raub, Pahang, Malaysia)

  • Faiza Rostam Affendi

    (Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Pahang, Raub Campus, 27600 Raub, Pahang, Malaysia)

Abstract

Studies on knowledge of insurance literacy have shown that people have poor understanding of terms related to disclosures due to the complication of the language of the fine prints. To avoid insurance disputes, certain jurisdictions in the US have incorporated the use of readability formulae, to help assess the reading-level of the policy for the benefits of the policyholders. In Malaysia, it is not known whether such a readability formula is incorporated in the drafting of the insurance policy. Thus, this study aimed to fill the gap by analysing the insurance policy provided by insurance companies in Malaysia in terms of its readability and lexical density. The data were procured from the policy documents obtained from two insurance companies in Malaysia. The policies were analysed using five validated readability formulae of Flesch Reading Ease Index, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Index, Gunning Fog Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Coleman-Liau Index, and Halliday’s lexical density formula. The readability consensus grades the policy documents as ‘difficult to read’. The analysis also reveals ‘average’ and ‘above average’ level of lexical density in both policies. The findings suggest that policyholders with a low level of English language proficiency may find it challenging to understand the legal documentation that elaborate their powers and liabilities to the contract signed. The findings of this study call for the attention of relevant authorities to mandate the incorporation of readability formulae in any policy drafted and the development of readability formula for English as a second or foreign language.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamisah Ariffin & Khalid Mat Pardi & Noli Maishara Nordin & Faiza Rostam Affendi, 2024. "Unravelling Complexity in Malaysian Life Insurance Policy Documents: The Questions of Readability and Lexical Density," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(10), pages 1788-1799, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:10:p:1788-1799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-10/1788-1799.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/unravelling-complexity-in-malaysian-life-insurance-policy-documents-the-questions-of-readability-and-lexical-density/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aishah Sheikh Abu Bakar & Rashid Ameer, 2011. "Readability of Corporate Social Responsibility communication in Malaysia," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 50-60, January.
    2. Berger, Lawrence A., 1988. "Word-of-mouth reputations in auto insurance markets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 225-234, September.
    3. Abdalla Elkheir Elgobshawi & Mohammed Aldawsari, 2022. "Lexical Density as Improvement Indicator in the Written Performance of EFL Majors," International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(4), pages 181-190.
    4. Katarzyna Barczuk, 2015. "The Usefulness Of Readability Formulas In The Insurance Industry," OLSZTYN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 10(4), pages 339-351, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seog S. Hun, 2006. "Limited Competition, Information Asymmetry, and Organizational Forms," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Jannik Gerwanski & Othar Kordsachia & Patrick Velte, 2019. "Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 750-770, July.
    3. Yuan-Shuh Lii & May-Ching Ding & Chih-Huang Lin, 2018. "Fair or Unfair: The Moderating Effect of Sustainable CSR Practices on Anticipatory Justice Following Service Failure Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Valentina Minutiello & Arcangelo Marrone & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Readability of integrated reports: Evidence from worldwide adopters," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 524-534, May.
    5. Saeidi, Sayedeh Parastoo & Sofian, Saudah & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Saeidi, Sayyedeh Parisa & Saaeidi, Seyyed Alireza, 2015. "How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 341-350.
    6. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    7. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    8. Shuolei Xu & Fangjun Wang & Charles P. Cullinan & Nanyan Dong, 2022. "Corporate Tax Avoidance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Readability: Evidence from China," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 267-289, June.
    9. Ralf Barkemeyer & Breeda Comyns & Frank Figge & Giulio Napolitano, 2014. "CEO statements in sustainability reports: Substantive information or background noise?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 241-257, December.
    10. Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & Oscar Suárez‐Fernández & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2019. "Obfuscation versus enhancement as corporate social responsibility disclosure strategies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 468-480, March.
    11. Nazamul Hoque & Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman & Rafiqul Islam Molla & Abu Hanifa Md. Noman & Mohammad Zahid Hossain Bhuiyan, 2018. "Is corporate social responsibility pursuing pristine business goals for sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1130-1142, November.
    12. Seong Ho Lee, 2021. "Effects of Retailers’ Corporate Social Responsibility on Retailer Equity and Consumer Usage Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-9, March.
    13. García-Sánchez, Isabel-María & Suárez-Fernández, Oscar & Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer, 2019. "Female directors and impression management in sustainability reporting," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 359-374.
    14. Waris Ali & Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Zubair Ahmad & Zeeshan Mahmood & Javed Iqbal, 2018. "The Relationship between Social Visibility and CSR Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, March.
    15. Mousa, Gehan A. & Elamir, Elsayed A.H. & Hussainey, Khaled, 2022. "The effect of annual report narratives on the cost of capital in the Middle East and North Africa: A machine learning approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Lim, Boon C. & Chung, Cindy M.Y., 2011. "The impact of word-of-mouth communication on attribute evaluation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 18-23, January.
    17. Moreno, Alonso, 2024. "Impression management in bilingual corporate reporting: An analysis of textual characteristics in Spanish and English," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    18. Hafiz Yasir Ali & Muhammad Asrar‐ul‐Haq & Shaheera Amin & Sadaf Noor & Muhammad Haris‐ul‐Mahasbi & Muhammad Kashif Aslam, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: The mediating role of employee engagement in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2908-2919, November.
    19. Joseph Mbawuni & Simon Gyasi Nimako, 2015. "Getting Loan Clients to Recommend Financial Service Providers: The Role of Satisfaction, Trust and Information Quality," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-78, February.
    20. Walid Ben‐Amar & Ines Belgacem, 2018. "Do socially responsible firms provide more readable disclosures in annual reports?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5), pages 1009-1018, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:10:p:1788-1799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.