IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v7y2023i9p1366-1384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Innovation on the Entrepreneurial Performance of Family Businesses with Special Reference to Nyaradzo Group, Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Tholakele Nkomo

    (Department of Business Management, National University of Science & Technology)

  • Mlisa Jasper Ndlovu

    (Department of Business Management, National University of Science & Technology)

Abstract

Family businesses are fast growing in earning consideration as key drivers of socio-economic development and entrepreneurial performance due to their multifaceted contributions to the economy. Despite the crucial role they play in the economy, family businesses face various challenges that stifle their potential and contribution to socio-economic development. In order to effectively contribute to economic development, family businesses need to establish and maintain their competitiveness. Innovation is widely acknowledged as one of the key factors in family businesses’ entrepreneurial performance. This study therefore sought to establish the effects of innovation on firm’s entrepreneurial performance focusing on family businesses. The main objective of the study is to investigate the effect of innovation on entrepreneurial performance of family businesses. The study is anchored on Schumpeter’s theory of entrepreneurship and innovation; the theory of the innovative firm; and the resource-based theory. To realise the research objectives, a descriptive – explanatory research design with a survey strategy was employed. The target population for the study was the entire 850 members of the Nyaradzo Group including the organisation’s management. A stratified probability sampling technique was used, and a sample size of 250 was adopted, this constituted at least 30% of the population. The main instrument for data collection was a semi-structured questionnaire administered to the target respondents. The SPSS tool was used to analyse quantitative data, whilst thematic approach was used to analyse qualitative data. The findings reveal that firm size had significant moderating effect on the innovation and entrepreneurial performance of family businesses. The study recommends that family businesses’ practitioners should consider implementing innovations to enhance their competitiveness, especially innovations with higher novelty that are new to the market, industry, country or the world. To achieve this, family businesses need to form linkages and cooperate in innovation with knowledge generating institutions that provide new knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Tholakele Nkomo & Mlisa Jasper Ndlovu, 2023. "The Effects of Innovation on the Entrepreneurial Performance of Family Businesses with Special Reference to Nyaradzo Group, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(9), pages 1366-1384, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:9:p:1366-1384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-7-issue-9/1366-1384.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-effects-of-innovation-on-the-entrepreneurial-performance-of-family-businesses-with-special-reference-to-nyaradzo-group-zimbabwe/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanessa Diaz-Moriana & Eric Clinton & Nadine Kammerlander & G. T. Lumpkin & Justin B. Craig, 2020. "Innovation Motives in Family Firms: A Transgenerational View," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(2), pages 256-287, March.
    2. Zoltán J. Acs & David B. Audretsch & Erik E. Lehmann & Georg Licht, 2017. "National systems of innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 997-1008, October.
    3. Koc, T. & Bozdag, E., 2017. "Measuring the degree of novelty of innovation based on Porter's value chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 559-567.
    4. Cucculelli, Marco & Peruzzi, Valentina, 2020. "Innovation over the industry life-cycle. Does ownership matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Maria Cesaroni & Gail Denisse Chamochumbi Diaz & Annalisa Sentuti, 2021. "Family Firms and Innovation from Founder to Successor," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Gita Surie, 2022. "Scaling the Innovation Ecosystem for Renewable Energy: The Case of India," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 89-103, June.
    3. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    4. Chulok Alexander, 2021. "Applying blended foresight methods for revealing incentives and future strategies of key national innovation system players," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 160-173, December.
    5. James A. Cunningham & Matthias Menter & Katharine Wirsching, 2019. "Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: a principal investigator-centered governance framework," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 545-562, February.
    6. Lyudmila A. Ramenskaya, 2020. "The concept of ecosystem in economic and management studies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 16-28, September.
    7. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Public Health Innovation through Cloud Adoption: A Comparative Analysis of Drivers and Barriers in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Linbin Zhu & Stavros Sindakis & Gazal Showkat, 2024. "Examining the Influence of Mayoral Overconfidence on Government Innovation Investment and City Innovation Power: an Environmental Boundary Model Approach," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14420-14451, September.
    9. Alfonso Unceta & Xabier Barandiaran & Natalia Restrepo, 2019. "The Role of Public Innovation Labs in Collaborative Governance—The Case of the Gipuzkoa Lab in the Basque Country, Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-16, November.
    10. Huy-Cuong Vo-Thai & Trinh-Hoang Hong-Hue & My-Linh Tran, 2021. "Technological- and Non-Technological Innovation During the Growth Phase of Industry Life Cycle: An Evidence From Vietnamese Manufacturing Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    11. Massimo G. Colombo & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Erik E. Lehmann & MariPaz Salmador, 2019. "The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 419-428, February.
    12. Carlos Moreno Miranda & Ra?l Moreno & Pablo Moreno, 2020. "Protected-Denomination-of-Origin Cocoa Bean: Chain governance and Sustainability Performance," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 22(1), pages 1-24.
    13. Daniel L. Bennett & Boris Nikolaev, 2021. "Individualism, pro-market institutions, and national innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 2085-2106, December.
    14. Lyudmila Nikolaevna Perepechko & Galina Yakovlevna Belyakova, 2018. "The Interconnection among Science, Industry, State, and Society in Russia," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 34(4), pages 425-443, December.
    15. Marta Urbaníková & Michaela Štubňová & Viera Papcunová & Jarmila Hudáková, 2020. "Analysis of Innovation Activities of Slovak Small and Medium-Sized Family Businesses," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Anne H. Gausdal & Karen V. Czachorowski & Marina Z. Solesvik, 2018. "Applying Blockchain Technology: Evidence from Norwegian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Zoltan J. Acs & Saul Estrin & Tomasz Mickiewicz & László Szerb, 2018. "Entrepreneurship, institutional economics, and economic growth: an ecosystem perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 501-514, August.
    18. Jung, Eunjun & Lee, Changjun & Hwang, Junseok, 2022. "Effective strategies to attract crowdfunding investment based on the novelty of business ideas," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Zhang, Dan & Pan, Xiaofei & Ma, Shiguang, 2023. "The effects of institutional investors and their contestability on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).
    20. Charis Vlados & Dimos Chatzinikolaou, 2019. "Business ecosystems policy in Stra.Tech.Man terms: The case of the Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(3), pages 163-197.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:9:p:1366-1384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.