IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v5y2021i08p472-487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Taxation on Economic Growth in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulmalik Omar

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Mulandi Victor Musyoki

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Musyoki Irene Muliwa

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Race Muthoni Wangechi

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Dennis Mbuthia

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Sammy Mbolu

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

  • Dr. Robert Ombati

    (School of Business and Economics, South Eastern Kenya University)

Abstract

The study was motivated by the increasing levels of taxation in Kenya as a result of the Increasing size of the Public Budget between over the years. The Study Period was between the years 2011 and 2020. The choice for the period was guided by the availability of Data and the increasing size of Kenya’s public budget which has made it necessary to increase the level of Taxation to counter the Budget deficit. The government of Kenya uses taxes as a means to generate revenue for its development objectives and provision of public goods like security and education. The main problem was that while the government uses taxes as a means to generate revenue they in turn generate both positive and negative impacts to the economy. In addition, money collected as a result of charging taxes always fall short of government expenditure necessitating the need for the government to borrow money. Various reforms have been made on tax policies in Kenya such as the recent Finance act 2021that was gazetted on 1st July 2021 which has broadened the coverage VAT tax increasing the prices of commodities therefore raising the standard of living. The general objective of the study was to investigate the effect of taxation on economic growth in Kenya while the specific objectives were to investigate the effect of income tax on economic growth in Kenya, to investigate the effect of VAT on economic growth in Kenya, To establish the effect of import duty on economic growth in Kenya and to investigate the effect of Excise duty on Economic growth as they are the four main forms of taxes the government of Kenya charges. The research aimed at answering the following research questions: Does income tax affect Economic growth in kenya? What is the effect of VAT on economic growth in Kenya and what is the effect of import duty on economic growth in Kenya? The study adopted the benefit theory, diffusion theory of tax incidence and endogenous growth theory and various previous researches like Nguluu (2017), Maingi (2010) and Murithii (2013) to show how economic growth in Kenya is impacted when Income tax, VAT, import duty and Excise duty are levied. Quantitative research design was applied with secondary data collected from C.B.K, K.N.B.S and K.R.A from the period 2011-2020 u. A Time series ARIMA regression model was then used to identify the relationship between the dependent and the independent variable and how the variables relate among themselves using STATA and SPSS. The estimated results showed that a 1% increase in Income tax leads to an increase in GDP by 0.678% holding all the other variables constant. A 1% increase in VAT leads to an increase in GDP by 1.480% holding all the other variables constant. A 1% increase in import duty leads to a decrease in GDP by 0.663% holding all the other variables constant and a 1% increase in Excise Duty leads to an increase in GDP by 2.783% holding all the other variables constant.The study concluded that that total Tax has a statisticaly significant relationship with economic growth with a P-value of 0.00. The study recommended that policy makers in the country should induce optimal and enabling tax policies that promote Economic growth and at the same time reduce leakages that happen in the tax system through evasions and avoidance by enacting tough laws against evaders and embracing an Online tax system for all tax payers.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulmalik Omar & Mulandi Victor Musyoki & Musyoki Irene Muliwa & Race Muthoni Wangechi & Dennis Mbuthia & Sammy Mbolu & Dr. Robert Ombati, 2021. "Effect of Taxation on Economic Growth in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(08), pages 472-487, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:08:p:472-487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-5-issue-8/472-487.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/effect-of-taxation-on-economic-growth-in-kenya/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco L. Rivera-Batiz & Luis A. Rivera-Batiz, 2018. "Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Francisco L Rivera-Batiz & Luis A Rivera-Batiz (ed.), International Trade, Capital Flows and Economic Development, chapter 1, pages 3-32, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Ouma, Duncan O., 2019. "Revenue Effects of Tax Reforms, Economic Growth and Political Environment in Kenya," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 7(1), January.
    3. Desislava Stoilova, 2017. "Tax structure and economic growth: Evidence from the European Union," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 62(3), pages 1041-1057, Julio-Sep.
    4. Bergstrom, Theodore & Blume, Lawrence & Varian, Hal, 1986. "On the private provision of public goods," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 25-49, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giorgio Fagiolo & Javier Reyes & Stefano Schiavo, 2010. "The evolution of the world trade web: a weighted-network analysis," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 479-514, August.
    2. Das, Gopal & van Esch, Patrick & Jain, Shailendra Pratap & Cui, Yuanyuan (Gina), 2023. "Donor happiness comes from afar: The role of donation beneficiary social distance and benevolence," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 865-880.
    3. Karl Aiginger & Michael Landesmann, 2002. "Competitive Economic Performance: The European View," WIFO Working Papers 179, WIFO.
    4. Ines Lindner & Holger Strulik, 2020. "Innovation And Inequality In A Small World," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(2), pages 683-719, May.
    5. Drivas, Kyriakos & Economidou, Claire & Karkalakos, Sotiris & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2016. "Mobility of knowledge and local innovation activity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 39-61.
    6. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Furukawa, Yuichi, 2016. "Unions, innovation and cross-country wage inequality," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 104-118.
    7. Hugh-Jones, David & Reinstein, David, 2012. "Anonymous rituals," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 478-489.
    8. Chin Lim, 2003. "Public Good Contributions Between Communities," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 5(3), pages 541-548, July.
    9. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2000. "Market Provision of Public Goods: The Case of Broadcasting," NBER Working Papers 7513, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Stefano Magrini & Marco Di Cataldo & Margherita Gerolimetto, 2020. "Urban Growth and Convergence Dynamics after COVID-19," Working Papers 2020:18, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    11. Ingrid Ott & Susanne Soretz, 2006. "Governmental activity, integration, and agglomeration," Working Paper Series in Economics 57, University of Lüneburg, Institute of Economics.
    12. Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Iryna Topolyan, 2013. "The Attack-and-Defence Group Contests," University of East Anglia Applied and Financial Economics Working Paper Series 049, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    13. Stefan Ambec & Yann Kervinio, 2016. "Cooperative decision-making for the provision of a locally undesirable facility," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(1), pages 119-155, January.
    14. Chu, Angus C. & Pan, Shiyuan & Sun, Minjuan, 2012. "When does elastic labor supply cause an inverted-U effect of patents on innovation?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 211-213.
    15. Matthias Doepke & Michèle Tertilt, 2019. "Does female empowerment promote economic development?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 309-343, December.
    16. Nathalie Monnet & Ugo Panizza, 2017. "A Note on the Economics of Philanthropy," IHEID Working Papers 19-2017, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    17. A. Abigail Payne, 2009. "Does Government Funding Change Behavior? An Empirical Analysis of Crowd-Out," NBER Chapters, in: Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 23, pages 159-184, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Alexis Habiyaremye, 2008. "Economic Proximity and Technology Flows: South Africa's Influence and the Role of Technological Interaction in Botswana's Diversification Effort," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2008-92, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Vicary, Simon & Sandler, Todd, 2002. "Weakest-link public goods: Giving in-kind or transferring money," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1501-1520, September.
    20. Arthur C. Brooks, 2001. "Private Philanthropy and the Economics of Public Radio," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 41, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:5:y:2021:i:08:p:472-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.