IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbl/journl/v26y2023i4p86-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gamification in management: Positive and negative aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Tomas Kacerauskas

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University)

  • Zivile Sedereviciute-Paciauskiene

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University)

  • Jolita Sliogeriene

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University)

Abstract

The phenomenon of gamification is analysed, identifying positive aspects of gamification, risks and problems. The paper adopts a method of systematic critical literature analysis in English, German, and Russian. We provide the most relevant gamification definitions classified into two main groups, fundamental and practical. The confusion of these groups or ignorance of one causes particular problems in understanding gamification. We face two levels of gamification in different areas of business management. It is the so-called meta- or macro-level and applied or micro-level. The paper aims to demonstrate the broader context of gamification in management by revealing the phenomenon’s positive and negative aspects. To reach the aim, five objectives were defined: i) to show the broader context of gamification in management; ii) to reveal the problems, risks, or even negative aspects of gamification in management; iii) to appeal to the practical issues how and in what areas to use gamification; iv) to show a broader cultural and philosophical context behind the manager interpretation of gamification; v) to introduce the discourse of gamification as an integrated theoretical approach that could reveal essential aspects of management. Gamification has both positive and negative aspects in all areas of management. On the one hand, gamification increases productivity and improves service, contributes to innovative participatory thinking and action, improves internal control, coordination, communication, collaboration, and creativity, increases motivation and pleasure at work, develops the soft skills of employees and reduces costs, as well as contributes to better acclimatisation. On the other hand, gamification commercialises human relations, causes novelty effects, elicits desired behaviour and predicts job performance, transforms organisational culture in unpredictable and counterintuitive ways, results in stress and anxiety, lowers self-esteem, causes exhaustion, conflict, and incomplete knowledge, serves as a means of domination and mobbing, and finally increases free-riding and work intimidation.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomas Kacerauskas & Zivile Sedereviciute-Paciauskiene & Jolita Sliogeriene, 2023. "Gamification in management: Positive and negative aspects," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 86-98, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:86-98
    DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2023-4-006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2023-4-006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15240/tul/001/2023-4-006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oswald Devisch & Alenka Poplin & Simona Sofronie, 2016. "The Gamification of Civic Participation: Two Experiments in Improving the Skills of Citizens to Reflect Collectively on Spatial Issues," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 81-102, April.
    2. Araújo, José & Pestana, Gabriel, 2017. "A framework for social well-being and skills management at the workplace," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 718-725.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koivisto, Jonna & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 191-210.
    2. Xin Zhang & Yaoyu Xu & Liang Ma, 2022. "Research on Successful Factors and Influencing Mechanism of the Digital Transformation in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Toda, Armando M. & do Carmo, Ricardo M.C. & da Silva, Alan P. & Bittencourt, Ig I. & Isotani, Seiji, 2019. "An approach for planning and deploying gamification concepts with social networks within educational contexts," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 294-303.
    4. Calzada, Igor, 2019. "Deciphering Smart City Citizenship: The Techno-Politics of Data and Urban Co-operative Platforms," SocArXiv ucbja, Center for Open Science.
    5. Cristina Ampatzidou & Katharina Gugerell & Teodora Constantinescu & Oswald Devisch & Martina Jauschneg & Martin Berger, 2018. "All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-46.
    6. Moro, Sérgio & Ramos, Pedro & Esmerado, Joaquim & Jalali, Seyed Mohammad Jafar, 2019. "Can we trace back hotel online reviews’ characteristics using gamification features?," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 88-95.
    7. Hassan, Lobna & Dias, Antonio & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "How motivational feedback increases user’s benefits and continued use: A study on gamification, quantified-self and social networking," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 151-162.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gamification; management; business; organisation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General
    • J53 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Labor-Management Relations; Industrial Jurisprudence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:86-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vendula Pospisilova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hflibcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.