IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2019i6p39-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SMART-Contracts via Blockchain as the Innovation Tool for SMEs Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yevheniia Polishchuk
  • Alla Ivashchenko
  • Oleksandr Dyba

Abstract

The main aim of the research is to develop recommendations for Cooperative model implementation in order to improve SMEs` performance by cost reduction through automating manual processes and attenuating legal risks regarding code-based SMART-contracts implementation via decentralized blockchain technology. The authors explored the main benefits for business entities of using SMART contracts as a digital tool for automating a large number of business processes in the DLT-system. Among with this, the potential risks for conducting the business activity of SMEs were considered, which could be exemplified as lack of legislation, high volatility of cryptocurrency, attenuation of monitoring level, etc. The usage of blockchain Smart contracts as the part of machine learning could lead to become SME Smarter, more dynamic, more flexible and more integrated with big data, which presupposes innovative component of business development. In the context of Smart specialization implementation in developing countries in EU, the Cooperative Model between different stakeholders based on SMART contracts in the frame of Smart specialization was designed and proposed by the authors. This Model allows to involve non-top developed regions into the innovative process. Besides SMEs' participation, the Model provides cooperation between other participants: research and innovative centers, universities, government structures, non-government organization, big corporations. It was studied how SMART contracts make review the business process and revolutionize it, improving difficult collaborations between business and science organizations. The fragment of possible Smart contract program code was regarded as an example.

Suggested Citation

  • Yevheniia Polishchuk & Alla Ivashchenko & Oleksandr Dyba, 2019. "SMART-Contracts via Blockchain as the Innovation Tool for SMEs Development," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 39-53.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2019:i:6:p:39-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=831391
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ers:journl:v:special_issue:y:2018:i:1:p:397-406 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Petros Kavassalis & Harald Stieber & Wolfgang Breymann & Keith Saxton & Francis Joseph Gross, 2018. "An innovative RegTech approach to financial risk monitoring and supervisory reporting," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 39-55, December.
    3. Tomáš Krabec & Percy Venegas, 2017. "Trust Design: Balancing Smart Contracts Utility and Decentralisation Risk," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 23(4), pages 433-435, November.
    4. Hughes, Alex & Park, Andrew & Kietzmann, Jan & Archer-Brown, Chris, 2019. "Beyond Bitcoin: What blockchain and distributed ledger technologies mean for firms," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 273-281.
    5. T.V. Shatkovskaya & A.B. Shumilina & G.G. Nebratenko & Ju.I. Isakova & E.Yu. Sapozhnikova, 2018. "Impact of Technological Blockchain Paradigm on the Movement of Intellectual Property in the Digital Space," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special1), pages 397-406.
    6. Igor Radanović & Robert Likić, 2018. "Opportunities for Use of Blockchain Technology in Medicine," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 583-590, October.
    7. Jianjun Sun & Jiaqi Yan & Kem Z. K. Zhang, 2016. "Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. A.V. Bogucharskov & I.E. Pokamestov & K.R. Adamova & Zh.N. Tropina, 2018. "Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Trade Finance Process," Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 7, pages 510-515.
    9. Willi Brammertz & Allan I. Mendelowitz, 2018. "From digital currencies to digital finance: the case for a smart financial contract standard," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 76-92, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Karaszewski & Paweł Modrzyński & Gözde Türkmen Müldür & Jacek Wójcik, 2021. "Blockchain Technology in Life Cycle Assessment—New Research Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dutta, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Somani, Surabhi & Butala, Richa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Jörg Weking & Michael Mandalenakis & Andreas Hein & Sebastian Hermes & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "The impact of blockchain technology on business models – a taxonomy and archetypal patterns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 285-305, June.
    3. Min Xu & Xingtong Chen & Gang Kou, 2019. "A systematic review of blockchain," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Severin Bonnet & Frank Teuteberg, 2023. "Impact of blockchain and distributed ledger technology for the management, protection, enforcement and monetization of intellectual property: a systematic literature review," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 229-275, June.
    5. Mirza, Nawazish & Umar, Muhammad & Afzal, Ayesha & Firdousi, Saba Fazal, 2023. "The role of fintech in promoting green finance, and profitability: Evidence from the banking sector in the euro zone," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 33-40.
    6. Chi-Ming Ho, 2023. "Research on interaction of innovation spillovers in the AI, Fin-Tech, and IoT industries: considering structural changes accelerated by COVID-19," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-29, December.
    7. Roberto Leonardo Rana & Pasquale Giungato & Angela Tarabella & Caterina Tricase, 2019. "Blockchain Applications and Sustainability Issues," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(S13), pages 861-861, November.
    8. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la techno," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    9. Kawther Saeedi & Monirah Dakilallah Almalki & Dania Aljeaid & Anna Visvizi & Muhammad Ahtisham Aslam, 2020. "Design Pattern Elicitation Framework for Proof of Integrity in Blockchain Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Kyungmoo Heo & Sangyoon Yi, 2023. "(De)centralization in the governance of blockchain systems: cryptocurrency cases," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(3), pages 59-82, September.
    11. Yunmei Liu & Shuai Zhang & Min Chen & Yenchun Wu & Zhengxian Chen, 2021. "The Sustainable Development of Financial Topic Detection and Trend Prediction by Data Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Manu Sharma & Anil Kumar & Sunil Luthra & Sudhanshu Joshi & Arvind Upadhyay, 2022. "The impact of environmental dynamism on low‐carbon practices and digital supply chain networks to enhance sustainable performance: An empirical analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1776-1788, May.
    13. Ivan D. Kotliarov, 2020. "Digital transformation of the financial industry: The substance and trends," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 72-81, July.
    14. Abirami Raja Santhi & Padmakumar Muthuswamy, 2022. "Influence of Blockchain Technology in Manufacturing Supply Chain and Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimić-Mišić & Monir Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić & Michael Hummel & Patrick Gane, 2023. "Regulatory Paradigm and Challenge for Blockchain Integration of Decentralized Systems: Example—Renewable Energy Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    16. Michael Becker & Kevin Merz & Rüdiger Buchkremer, 2020. "RegTech—the application of modern information technology in regulatory affairs: areas of interest in research and practice," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 161-167, October.
    17. Kumar, Sourabh & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2023. "Exploring the hyperledger blockchain technology disruption and barriers of blockchain adoption in petroleum supply chain," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    18. Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Mäntymäki, Matti & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Blockchain applications in management: A bibliometric analysis and literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    19. Marco Bellucci & Damiano Cesa Bianchi & Giacomo Manetti, 2021. "A literature review on blockchain in accounting research," Working Papers - Business wp2021_04.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    20. Lee, Jei Young, 2019. "A decentralized token economy: How blockchain and cryptocurrency can revolutionize business," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 773-784.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2019:i:6:p:39-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.