IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2017i6p172-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gross Margin and Buyer Power in Bulgarian Food Retailing

Author

Listed:
  • Violeta Dimitrova

Abstract

Increasing concentration in retail trade due to the expansion of physical outlets, the proliferation of online stores and the construction of retail chains results in changes in the bargaining power of retailers. Such changes are further facilitated by the accelerated process of merger, purchase and introduction of own-brands. This work aims to offer a comparative analysis of the structure of food products manufacturing, wholesaling and retailing in Bulgaria and it studies the level of gross margin in retail trade to research the power of retailers as buyers in the sector. This study makes an overview of the theory of the retail buyers’ power in the consumer goods supply chain. The paper further explores changes in the concentration of production, wholesale and retail in Bulgaria between 2001 and 2015 by analyzing the market share of the four companies with the largest sales volume and bargaining power of retailers measured by the level of gross margin.

Suggested Citation

  • Violeta Dimitrova, 2017. "Gross Margin and Buyer Power in Bulgarian Food Retailing," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 172-188.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2017:i:6:p:172-188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=645679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Camillo Lento & Naqi Sayed, 2015. "Do changes in gross margin percentage provide complementary information to revenue and earnings surprises?," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(3), pages 239-261, August.
    2. George J. Stigler, 1947. "Trends in Employment," NBER Chapters, in: Trends in Output and Employment, pages 32-41, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Margaret Hall & John Knapp, 1955. "Gross Margins And Efficiency Measurement In Retail Trade," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 0(3), pages 312-326.
    4. J. D. Hughes & S. Pollard, 1957. "Gross Margins In Retail Distribution," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 75-87.
    5. Chen, Zhiqi, 2003. "Dominant Retailers and the Countervailing-Power Hypothesis," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(4), pages 612-625, Winter.
    6. Inderst, Roman & Jakubovic, Zlata & Jovanovic, Dragan, 2015. "Buyer Power and Functional Competition for Innovation," MPRA Paper 61214, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Can Erutku, 2005. "Buying power and strategic interactions," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(4), pages 1160-1172, November.
    8. George J. Stigler, 1947. "Trends in Output and Employment," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number stig47-1.
    9. George J. Stigler, 1947. "Trends in Output," NBER Chapters, in: Trends in Output and Employment, pages 6-31, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Dobson, Paul W & Waterson, Michael, 1997. "Countervailing Power and Consumer Prices," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(441), pages 418-430, March.
    11. Can Erutku, 2005. "Buying power and strategic interactions," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1160-1172, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Desislava Racheva, 2020. "Analyzing Different Approaches to the Relations with the Insurance Intermediaries on the Non-Life Insurance Market in Bulgaria," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 9(3), pages 117-126, December.
    2. Desislava Racheva, 2019. "Analysis of Changes in the Regulatory Requirements for Participants in the Non-life Insurance Market in Bulgaria," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 8(2), pages 120-129, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiqi Chen & Hong Ding & Zhiyang Liu, 2016. "Downstream Competition and the Effects of Buyer Power," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 49(1), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Jeon, Doh-Shin & Menicucci, Domenico, 2014. "Buyer Group and Buyer Power When Sellers Compete," TSE Working Papers 14-543, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Nov 2017.
    3. Sara Fisher Ellison & Christopher M. Snyder, 2010. "Countervailing Power In Wholesale Pharmaceuticals," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 32-53, March.
    4. Jeon, Doh-Shin & Menicucci, Domenico, 2019. "On the unprofitability of buyer groups when sellers compete," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 265-288.
    5. Noriaki Matsushima & Shohei Yoshida, 2016. "The countervailing power hypothesis when dominant retailers function as sales promoters," ISER Discussion Paper 0981, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    6. Hao Wang, 2010. "Buyer Power, Transport Cost and Welfare," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 41-53, March.
    7. Qiu Zhao, 2019. "The Influence of Buyer Power on Supply Chain Pricing with Downstream Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Noriaki Matsushima & Shohei Yoshida, 2022. "The countervailing power hypothesis and contingent contracts," ISER Discussion Paper 1191, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    9. Athanasoglou, Panayiotis P. & Georgiou, Evangelia A. & Staikouras, Christos C., 2009. "Assessing output and productivity growth in the banking industry," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 1317-1340, November.
    10. J. Stan Metcalfe & John Foster, 2010. "Evolutionary Growth Theory," Chapters, in: Mark Setterfield (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. G Cameron, 1996. "Innovation and Economic Growth," CEP Discussion Papers dp0277, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    12. Charles R. Hulten, 2000. "Total Factor Productivity: A Short Biography," NBER Working Papers 7471, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Seok Yang & Myeonghwan Cho, 2024. "Pricing Third-Party Access to Essential Facilities under Asymmetric Information," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 40, pages 315-348.
    14. Jeremy Greenwood & Boyan Jovanovic, 2001. "Accounting for Growth," NBER Chapters, in: New Developments in Productivity Analysis, pages 179-224, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Zvi Griliches, 1996. "The Discovery of the Residual: A Historical Note," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1324-1330, September.
    16. Elsadig Musa Ahmed, 2007. "The Impact of Biochemical Oxygen Demand Emissions on Malaysia's Manufacturing Productivity Growth," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 305-319.
    17. Elsadig Musa Ahmed, 2009. "Factors Shaping Malaysia'S Manufacturing Productivity Growth," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 54(02), pages 249-262.
    18. Ahmed, Elsadig Musa, 2012. "Are the FDI inflow spillover effects on Malaysia's economic growth input driven?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1498-1504.
    19. Wu Harry X., 2019. "In Quest of Institutional Interpretation of TFP Change—The Case of China," Man and the Economy, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-22, December.
    20. Claudia Goldin & Lawrence F. Katz, 2024. "The Incubator of Human Capital: The NBER and the Rise of the Human Capital Paradigm," NBER Chapters, in: The Economic History of American Inequality: New Evidence and Perspectives, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2017:i:6:p:172-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.