IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220175422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralization Of Inter-Budget Relations: Theory, Practice, And International Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Liudmyla Pidchosa

    (Kyiv City State Administration, Ukraine)

  • Igor Lyutyy

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr Pidchosa

    (Institute of International Relations of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to justify the methods of budget policy for the redistribution of cash flows in terms of differentiating powers at different levels of government and to analyse intergovernmental regulation improvement. The subject of the study is the methods of budget policy and intergovernmental regulation improvement. Research methodology. The research is based on analysis, comparison, and generalization of statistical data concerning territorial development, distribution of production capacities, migration of population and its determinants, statistical data on the state of macro-financial turbulence. The hypothesis is based on the above data. Practical implication. The budget policy is directed to reaching a certain socio-economic effect at a certain stage of social development, is implemented by the authorities with appropriate powers in a certain territory. In the administrative and budgetary reform, intergovernmental relations are multidimensional and their research needs to be conducted from the point of their categorization in terms of scale and long-term achievement of the set goals and objectives, as well as depending on priorities in the budget process management. Achievement of the effective system of intergovernmental relations is possible only if there is the unity of all subjects of the budget system. In this context, the most pressing issues of intergovernmental interactions and regulation of cash flows are highlighted. Value/originality. The proposed model of principles, tools, and mechanism of distribution and regulation of intergovernmental fiscal flows will provide an opportunity to ensure the unity of all levels of the budget system and their interaction, which, in turn, will ensure macro-financial stability of the state, efficient allocation of budget expenditure, development of society's democratization and uniform socio-economic development of some regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liudmyla Pidchosa & Igor Lyutyy & Oleksandr Pidchosa, 2019. "Decentralization Of Inter-Budget Relations: Theory, Practice, And International Experience," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2017:5:4:22
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-182-196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/721/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/721
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-182-196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Marlow, 1988. "Fiscal decentralization and government size," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 259-269, March.
    2. Caroline Patsias & Anne Latendresse & Laurence Bherer, 2013. "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2214-2230, November.
    3. Douglas Holtz-Eakin & Harvey S . Rosen, 1988. "Tax Deductibility and Municipal Budget Structure," NBER Chapters, in: Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies, pages 107-136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. de Mello, Luiz Jr, 2000. "Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: A Cross-Country Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 365-380, February.
    5. Fisman, Raymond & Gatti, Roberta, 2002. "Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence from U.S. Federal Transfer Programs," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 113(1-2), pages 25-35, October.
    6. Jonathan Rodden, 2000. "Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints," World Bank Publications - Reports 11426, The World Bank Group.
    7. Sara Brorström & Daniela Argento & Giuseppe Grossi & Anna Thomasson & Roland Almqvist, 2018. "Translating sustainable and smart city strategies into performance measurement systems," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 193-202, April.
    8. Richard Eccleston & Richard Krever, 2017. "The future of the Australian federation: intergovernmental financial relations amid growing fiscal pressures," Chapters, in: Richard Eccleston & Richard Krever (ed.), The Future of Federalism, chapter 4, pages 95-123, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Ms. Era Dabla-Norris & Mr. Paul R Wade, 2002. "The Challenge of Fiscal Decentralization in Transition Countries," IMF Working Papers 2002/103, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Harvey S. Rosen, 1988. "Fiscal Federalism: Quantitative Studies," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number rose88-1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thushyanthan Baskaran, 2010. "On the link between fiscal decentralization and public debt in OECD countries," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 351-378, December.
    2. George Crowley & Russell Sobel, 2011. "Does fiscal decentralization constrain Leviathan? New evidence from local property tax competition," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 5-30, October.
    3. Violeta Vulovic, 2010. "The effect of sub-national borrowing control on fiscal sustainability: How to regulate?," Working Papers 2010/36, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    4. repec:ces:ifodic:v:2:y:2004:i:1:p:14567690 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Gilbert E. Metcalf, 1993. "Tax exporting, federal deductibility, and state tax structure," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(1), pages 109-126.
    6. Luiz De Mello, 2001. "Fiscal federalism and government size in transition economies: the case of Moldova," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(2), pages 255-268.
    7. Leonardo Letelier S., 2005. "Explaining Fiscal Decentralization," Public Finance Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 155-183, March.
    8. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Agnese Sacchi, 2017. "The Impact Of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1095-1129, September.
    9. Slemrod, Joel, 1992. "Do Taxes Matter? Lessons from the 1980's," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(2), pages 250-256, May.
    10. Reingewertz, Yaniv, 2014. "Fiscal Decentralization - a Survey of the Empirical Literature," MPRA Paper 59889, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Baskaran, Thushyanthan, 2011. "Fiscal decentralization, ideology, and the size of the public sector," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 485-506, September.
    12. Howard Chernick, 1992. "A Model of the Distributional Incidence of State and Local Taxes," Public Finance Review, , vol. 20(4), pages 572-585, October.
    13. Qiao, Mo & Ding, Siying & Liu, Yongzheng, 2019. "Fiscal decentralization and government size: The role of democracy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 316-330.
    14. Anwar Shah & Theresa Thompson & Heng-fu Zou, 2004. "Decentralising the public sector: The Impact of Decentralisation on Service Delivery, Corruption, Fiscal Management and Growth in Developing and Emerging Market Economies: A Synthesis of Empirical Evi," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(1), pages 10-14, October.
    15. Paolo Liberati & Agnese Sacchi, 2013. "Tax decentralization and local government size," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 183-205, October.
    16. Faguet, Jean-Paul & Sánchez, Fabio, 2008. "Decentralization's Effects on Educational Outcomes in Bolivia and Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1294-1316, July.
    17. Metcalf, G.E., 1991. "The Role Of Federal Taxation In The Supply Of Municipal Bonds: Evidence From Municipal Governments," Papers 72, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - John M. Olin Program.
    18. Anwar Shah & Theresa Thompson & Heng-fu Zou, 2004. "Decentralising the public sector: The Impact of Decentralisation on Service Delivery, Corruption, Fiscal Management and Growth in Developing and Emerging Market Economies: A Synthesis of Empirical Evi," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(01), pages 10-14, October.
    19. Inaki Aldasoro & Mr. Mike Seiferling, 2014. "Vertical Fiscal Imbalances and the Accumulation of Government Debt," IMF Working Papers 2014/209, International Monetary Fund.
    20. Andros Kourtellos & Alex Lenkoski & Kyriakos Petrou, 2020. "Measuring the strength of the theories of government size," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 2185-2222, November.
    21. Violeta Vulovic, 2010. "The effect of sub-national borrowing control on fiscal sustainability: How to regulate?," Working Papers 2010/36, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    budget; intergovernmental fiscal regulation; fiscal decentralization; local authorities; territorial justice; editing coefficient; negative transfers; governmental grants; subsidies; local communities; local budgets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H61 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Budget; Budget Systems
    • H68 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2017:5:4:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.