IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/avo/emipdu/v31y2022i2p639-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding The Complexity Of Assessing Cultural Heritage’S Economic Impact On The Economic Sustainability Of A Tourism Destination: The Case Of Split, Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Ingeborg Matecic

    (University of Zagreb, Croatia, Faculty of Economics & Business)

  • Oliver Kesar

    (University of Zagreb, Croatia, Faculty of Economics & Business)

  • Danijela Ferjanic Hodak

    (University of Zagreb, Croatia, Faculty of Economics & Business)

Abstract

The purpose of this conceptual study is to define the possibilities and constraints of assessing the economic impact of tangible cultural heritage on the economic sustainability of a tourism destination. To achieve this goal, the following were critically analysed: (1) strengths and limitations of previously used assessment approaches and techniques; and (2) sustainable development indicators for urban tourism destinations that contain world-class cultural heritage sites. The case study used in this research is an urban cultural heritage site listed on the UNESCO World Heritage List, namely the Historical Complex of Split with the Palace of Diocletian, Croatia, and the associated tourism destination setting. Observational and case study methods were used. Despite all previous efforts to prevent miscalculations and develop a technique that would best suit the tangible cultural heritage valuation process, findings suggest that each cultural heritage site has unique characteristics and requires its own approach to assessing its value and impact. Moreover, such findings have further implications for the UNESCO World Heritage List and the management of World Heritage sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingeborg Matecic & Oliver Kesar & Danijela Ferjanic Hodak, 2022. "Understanding The Complexity Of Assessing Cultural Heritage’S Economic Impact On The Economic Sustainability Of A Tourism Destination: The Case Of Split, Croatia," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 31(2), pages 639-662, december.
    • Handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:639-662
    DOI: 10.17818/EMIP/2022/2.14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php/clanak/416007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17818/EMIP/2022/2.14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angels Niñerola & Maria-Victòria Sánchez-Rebull & Ana-Beatriz Hernández-Lara, 2019. "Tourism Research on Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    2. P. Poor & Jamie Smith, 2004. "Travel Cost Analysis of a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of Historic St. Mary's City of Maryland," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 28(3), pages 217-229, August.
    3. Douglas S. Noonan, 2007. "Finding an Impact of Preservation Policies: Price Effects of Historic Landmarks on Attached Homes in Chicago, 1990-1999," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 21(1), pages 17-33, February.
    4. Hough, Douglas E. & Kratz, Charles G., 1983. "Can "good" architecture meet the market test?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 40-54, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lazrak, F. & Nijkamp, P. & Rietveld, P. & Rouwendal, J., 2009. "Cultural heritage and creative cities: an economic evaluation perspective," Serie Research Memoranda 0036, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    2. Gabriel M. Ahfeldt & Alexandra Mastro, 2011. "Valuing Iconic Design: Frank Lloyd Wright Architecture in Oak Park, Illinois," SERC Discussion Papers 0084, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Douglas S. Noonan, 2013. "Market effects of historic preservation," Chapters, in: Ilde Rizzo & Anna Mignosa (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, chapter 17, pages i-i, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Fátima Espinosa Casero & Luis César Herrero Prieto, 2024. "Valuing cultural heritage through non-monetary scales: A comparison," ACEI Working Paper Series AWP-02-2024, Association for Cultural Economics International.
    5. Ilir Nase & Jim Berry & Alastair Adair, 2016. "Impact of quality-led design on real estate value: a spatiotemporal analysis of city centre apartments," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 309-331, October.
    6. K. Willis & J. Snowball & C. Wymer & José Grisolía, 2012. "A count data travel cost model of theatre demand using aggregate theatre booking data," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(2), pages 91-112, May.
    7. Thomas Bausch & Tilman Schröder & Verena Tauber & Bernard Lane, 2021. "Sustainable Tourism: The Elephant in the Room," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Sevrin Waights, 2019. "The preservation of historic districts—is it worth it?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 433-464.
    9. Wende Wang & Mozhuang Fu & Qingwu Hu, 2020. "The Behavioral Pattern of Chinese Public Cultural Participation in Museums," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Been, Vicki & Ellen, Ingrid Gould & Gedal, Michael & Glaeser, Edward & McCabe, Brian J., 2016. "Preserving history or restricting development? The heterogeneous effects of historic districts on local housing markets in New York City," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 16-30.
    11. Yijing Su & Li Cong & Geoffrey Wall, 2023. "Tourism Knowledge Domains of Chinese and International Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    12. Riaz Tabassum & Selama Aslam Izah & Nor Normaziah Mohd & Hassan Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh, 2024. "Meaningful Review of Existing Trends, Expansion, and Future Directions of Green Bond Research: A Bibliometric Approach," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 1-36, March.
    13. Douglas S. Noonan & Ilde Rizzo, 2017. "Economics of cultural tourism: issues and perspectives," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 95-107, May.
    14. Bhavna Thawani & Tushar Panigrahi & Meena Bhatia, 2024. "Eleven years of integrated reporting: a bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 666-684, December.
    15. Atalel Wubalem & Teshale Woldeamanuel & Zerihun Nigussie, 2023. "Economic Valuation of Lake Tana: A Recreational Use Value Estimation through the Travel Cost Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Weisheng Chiu & Thomas Chun Man Fan & Sang-Back Nam & Ping-Hung Sun, 2021. "Knowledge Mapping and Sustainable Development of eSports Research: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Wadu Mesthrige Jayantha & Esther Hiu Kwan Yung, 2018. "Effect of Revitalisation of Historic Buildings on Retail Shop Values in Urban Renewal: An Empirical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Pahrudin Pahrudin & Li-Wei Liu & Shao-Yu Li, 2022. "What Is the Role of Tourism Management and Marketing toward Sustainable Tourism? A Bibliometric Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Mario A. Fernandez & Shane L. Martin, 2020. "What’s so special about character?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3236-3251, December.
    20. Franz Fuerst & Patrick McAllister & Claudia B Murray, 2011. "Designer Buildings: Estimating the Economic Value of ‘Signature’ Architecture," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(1), pages 166-184, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic value; cultural heritage; economic sustainability; tourism destination; Split;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z30 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - General
    • Z32 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Tourism and Development
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avo:emipdu:v:31:y:2022:i:2:p:639-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nebojsa Stojcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/oedubhr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.