IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ijells/v10y2021i3p224-235id528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compatibility of Semantics of Suffixes with Gender Assignment in Old English

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Soloviova
  • Ihor Bloshchynskyi
  • Larysa Tsviak
  • Olena Voitiuk
  • Olha Mysechko

Abstract

The article reveals the research results of a correlation between principles of gender assignment and meaning of coined words. In Old English, derivatives belonging to three genders (masculine, feminine and neuter), inherited from Proto-Indo-European legacy, were numerous and their suffixes were determined to some extent on the basis of semantic criteria. Our research aimed at investigating the possibility of a connection between genders of suffixes and the semantic peculiarities of their derivatives. To carry the analysis and identify the meaning of suffixes, we set 21 semantic groups which were characteristic of Old English derivatives. The findings suggest that there are certain semantic regularities that are part of the gender assignment system in Old English. The majority of masculine and feminine suffixes are responsible for nouns belonging to 3 – 5 semantic groups while the neuter suffixes have from 2 to 4 semantic groups. Thus, it is possible to divide suffixes according to their primary semantic content. The paper provided evidence that derivatives of each gender have the following semantic segments: notions of people, administration and social stratification for masculine suffixes; abstractions, feelings and emotions, traits of character and activities for feminine ones, and structures, locations and lifeless objects for neuter suffixes. It was also evident that semantic peculiarities of Old English suffixes build a ground for the competition between them and are vital for their further development in an English language course.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Soloviova & Ihor Bloshchynskyi & Larysa Tsviak & Olena Voitiuk & Olha Mysechko, 2021. "Compatibility of Semantics of Suffixes with Gender Assignment in Old English," International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(3), pages 224-235.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:224-235:id:528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/article/view/528/969
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuliia Hrybinyk & Tetiana Halai & Nadia Yesypenko & Ihor Bloshchynskyi, 2022. "Approaching Metaphorical Terms in Subject-specific Terminologies (Geologic and Geodetic): Semantic and Structural Aspects," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(6), pages 470-470, September.
    2. Natalia Tsyntar & Volodymyr Kushneryk & Tetiana Tonenchuk & Olena Mudra & Ihor Bloshchynskyi, 2022. "Syntactic Means of Expressing Emotivity (On the Basis of the English Literary Works)," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(6), pages 505-505, September.
    3. Alla Kyrda-Omelian & Lesia Viktorova & Mykola Kutsenko & Yuliia Bobyr & Kostiantyn Mamchur & Olena Shcherbyna & Oleksandr Lahodynskyi & Ihor Bloshchynskyi, 2022. "ESP for Interpreters and Translators: Foreign Language Provision or Integrated Education?," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(2), pages 405-405, December.
    4. Ihor Bloshchynskyi & Iryna Mishchynska & Nataliia Pasichnyk & Anna Kosenko & Olga Plavutska & Nataliia Zakordonets & Nataliia Hotsa, 2022. "Peculiarities of Linguistic Analysis of the Text as a Language Learning Strategy," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(5), pages 1-49, June.
    5. Alla Kyrda-Omelian & Oleksandr Pashkov & Andrei Pashkov & Oleh Furs & Olena Shcherbyna & Lesia Viktorova & Oleksandr Lahodynskyi & Ihor Bloshchynskyi, 2022. "Foreign Language for Future Diplomats: What Integrated Education Approach Is Better?," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(1), pages 177-177, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ijells:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:224-235:id:528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5019/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.