IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/ajemod/v3y2015i2p33-45id836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Organizational Independence of Internal Auditors in Ghana: Empirical Evidence from Local Government

Author

Listed:
  • Abudu Dawuda
  • Gariba Oswald Aninanya
  • Samuel Erasmus Alnaa

Abstract

The effectiveness of the internal audit units in the public sector in promoting good corporate governance and risk management depends on several factors including the level of organizational independence they enjoy. This study therefore, sought to investigate the organizational independence of the internal auditors in the local government sector in Ghana. Descriptive research method was employed. The study deployed multistage sampling method to select internal auditors and purposive sampling for external auditors from Ghana Audit Service. In all, a total of 120 questionnaires were administered to them, out of which only 90 questionnaires were completed and returned. The main finding of the study include among others: inadequate budget allocation, internal audit units are given low status, management determine the scope of internal audit work due to absence of internal audit charter. The most serious threats to internal auditors’ independence include intimidation and familiarity threats. The study concludes that, the organizational independence of the internal auditors in the local government sector is in danger. It recommends that every assembly should establish an effective and quality Audit Review Implementation Committee (ARIC) that would give necessary support to both internal auditors and external auditors. Each assembly should have its own Internal Audit Charter. The internal audit units also need to be supported with necessary logistics.

Suggested Citation

  • Abudu Dawuda & Gariba Oswald Aninanya & Samuel Erasmus Alnaa, 2015. "The Organizational Independence of Internal Auditors in Ghana: Empirical Evidence from Local Government," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(2), pages 33-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:asi:ajemod:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:33-45:id:836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5009/article/view/836/1282
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evangelia Pappa & John Filos, 2019. "Benchmarking the Ethics of Internal Auditors: A Comparative Analysis of Private and Public Sector," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 69(1-2), pages 30-44, January-J.
    2. Yusheng Kong & Peter Yao Lartey & Fatoumata Binta Maci Bah & Nirmalya B. Biswas, 2018. "The Value of Public Sector Risk Management: An Empirical Assessment of Ghana," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:ajemod:v:3:y:2015:i:2:p:33-45:id:836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5009/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.