IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2019p852-857.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of Environmental Education Model for Primary School Pupils in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Norazilawati Abdullah*

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, UPSI, Malaysia)

  • Kung-Teck Wong

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, UPSI, Malaysia)

  • Rosnidar Mansor

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, UPSI, Malaysia)

  • Lilia Halim

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM, Malaysia)

  • Haryanti Mohd Affandi

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM, Malaysia)

Abstract

The research was conducted to develop an Environmental Education Model and to identify the level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and skill of primary school pupils in Malaysia towards the environment using the model. The research was conducted through a survey using a questionnaire. The sample was randomly selected, involving 1000 pupils of Year 5 from Peninsular Malaysia divided into four zones, north zone (Kedah), east zone (Kelantan), west zone (Kuala Lumpur) and south zone (Melaka). The findings showed that the level of awareness, knowledge, attitude and skill of pupil were at a high level. The model had been developed by looking at direct impact testing through Evaluation Assessment Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) which suggested that awareness and skill factors were factors that significantly influenced pupils’ attitudes toward environmental education. Both relationships were positive. However, the relationship between knowledge and attitude was not significant. The findings also revealed that the awareness factor was the factor that most strongly influenced pupil’s attitudes. It can be concluded that the awareness variable was the main predictor of this structure model in predicting pupils’ appreciation toward environmental education.

Suggested Citation

  • Norazilawati Abdullah* & Kung-Teck Wong & Rosnidar Mansor & Lilia Halim & Haryanti Mohd Affandi, 2019. "Development of Environmental Education Model for Primary School Pupils in Malaysia," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(4), pages 852-857, 04-2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:852-857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/jssr5(4)852-857.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/7/archive/04-2019/4/5
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Britta Oerke & Franz X. Bogner, 2010. "Gender, age and subject matter: impact on teachers’ ecological values," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 111-122, June.
    2. Manuku Mukoni, 2013. "Environmental Education in Zimbabwean Secondary Schools: Greening or Transformative Social Change?," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(4), pages 971-991, April.
    3. Manuku Mukoni, 2013. "Environmental Education in Zimbabwean Secondary Schools: Greening or Transformative Social Change?," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(4), pages 971-991.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:1187-1192 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Neil Taylor & Frances Quinn & Kathy Jenkins & Helen Miller-Brown & Nadya Rizk & Theodosia Prodromou & Penelope Serow & Subhashni Taylor, 2019. "Education for Sustainability in the Secondary Sector—A Review," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 102-122, March.
    3. Matthias Winfried Kleespies & Paul Wilhelm Dierkes, 2020. "Impact of biological education and gender on students’ connection to nature and relational values," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Halkos, George & Gkargkavouzi, Anastasia & Matsiori, Steriani, 2018. "Teachers’ environmental knowledge and pro-environmental behavior: An application of CNS and EID scales," MPRA Paper 84505, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Michaela Maurer & Franz Xaver Bogner, 2020. "First steps towards sustainability? University freshmen perceptions on nature versus environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    6. Javier Cifuentes-Faura & Ursula Faura-Martínez & Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainable Development in Secondary School Economics Students According to Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Ayisha Siddiqua & Maisa El Gamal & Waheed Kareem Abdul & Lama Mahmoud & Fares M Howari, 2022. "E-Device Purchase and Disposal Behaviours in the UAE: An Exploratory Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Patricia Raab & Christoph Randler & Franz X. Bogner, 2018. "How Young “Early Birds” Prefer Preservation, Appreciation and Utilization of Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Christine Thorn & Franz X. Bogner, 2018. "How Environmental Values Predict Acquisition of Different Cognitive Knowledge Types with Regard to Forest Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-11, June.
    10. Franz X. Bogner, 2018. "Environmental Values (2-MEV) and Appreciation of Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10, January.
    11. Josephat Paul Nkaizirwa & Catherine Musalagani Aurah & Florien Nsanganwimana, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes as the Correlates of Environmental Identity among Pre-Service Biology Teachers in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Chona Vince Cruz & Fe Espedido & Ryanorlie Abeledo, 2015. "Shaping minds to action: an evaluation of the environmental influences of primary school students in an urbanizing community," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 641-652, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:852-857. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=7&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.