IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2016.303578_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transgender population size in the United States: A meta-regression of population-based probability samples

Author

Listed:
  • Meerwijk, E.L.
  • Sevelius, J.M.

Abstract

Background. Transgender individuals have a gender identity that differs from the sex they were assigned at birth. The population size of transgender individuals in the United States is not well-known, in part because official records, including the US Census, do not include data on gender identity. Population surveys today more often collect trans-gender inclusive gender-identity data, and secular trends in culture and the media have created a somewhat more favorable environment for transgender people. Objectives. To estimate the current population size of transgender individuals in the United States and evaluate any trend over time. Search methods. In June and July 2016, we searched PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science for national surveys, as well as "gray" literature, through an Internet search. We limited the search to 2006 through 2016. Selection criteria. We selected population-based surveys that used probability sampling and included self-reported transgender-identity data. Data collection and analysis. We used random-effects meta-analysis to pool eligible surveys and used meta-regression to address our hypothesis that the transgender population size estimate would increase over time. We used subsample and leave-one-out analysis to assess for bias. Main results. Our meta-regression model, based on 12 surveys covering 2007 to 2015, explained 62.5% of model heterogeneity, with a significant effect for each unit increase in survey year (F = 17.122; df = 1,10; b = 0.026%; P = .002). Extrapolating these results to 2016 suggested a current US population size of 390 adults per 100 000, or almost 1 million adults nationally. This estimate may be more indicative for younger adults, who represented more than 50% of the respondents in our analysis. Authors' conclusions. Future national surveys are likely to observe higher numbers of transgender people. The large variety in questions used to ask about transgender identity may account for residual heterogeneity in our models. Public health implications. Under- or non-representation of transgender individuals in population surveys is a barrier to understanding social determinants and health disparities faced by this population. We recommend using standardized questions to identify respondents with transgender and nonbinary gender identities, which will allow a more accurate population size estimate.

Suggested Citation

  • Meerwijk, E.L. & Sevelius, J.M., 2017. "Transgender population size in the United States: A meta-regression of population-based probability samples," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(2), pages 1-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303578_2
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303578
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Travis Campbell & Yana van der Meulen Rodgers, 2022. "Health insurance coverage and health outcomes among transgender adults in the United States," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 973-992, June.
    2. Valérie Lederer & Karen Messing & Hélène Sultan-Taïeb, 2022. "How Can Quantitative Analysis Be Used to Improve Occupational Health without Reinforcing Social Inequalities? An Examination of Statistical Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Kolk, Martin & Tilley, J. Lucas & von Essen, Emma & Moberg, Ylva & Burn, Ian, 2023. "The Demography of Sweden’s Transgender Population – Patterns, Changes, and Sociodemographics," Working Paper Series 7/2023, Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research.
    4. María José Torres Herrera, 2020. "¿Interactuar o no interactuar? Un estudio experimental sobre expresiones de género," Documentos CEDE 18365, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    5. Shanna K. Kattari & Leonardo Kattari & Ian Johnson & Ashley Lacombe-Duncan & Brayden A. Misiolek, 2020. "Differential Experiences of Mental Health among Trans/Gender Diverse Adults in Michigan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Ajay Keshav Pandey & Kristie Seelman, 2022. "History of Sex Work Is Associated with Increased Risk of Adverse Mental Health and Substance Use Outcomes in Transgender Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    7. H. Robert Outten & Marcella E. Lawrence, 2020. "Intergroup Threat and Heterosexual Cisgender Women’s Support for Policies Regarding the Admittance of Trans Women at a Women’s College," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Kelly K. Dray & Vaughn R. E. Smith & Toni P. Kostecki & Isaac E. Sabat & Cassidy R. Thomson, 2020. "Moving beyond the gender binary: Examining workplace perceptions of nonbinary and transgender employees," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1181-1191, November.
    9. Erin N. Harrop & Hillary K. Hecht & Vern Harner & Jarrod Call & Brendon T. Holloway, 2023. "“How Do I Exist in This Body…That’s Outside of the Norm?” Trans and Nonbinary Experiences of Conformity, Coping, and Connection in Atypical Anorexia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-17, January.
    10. David Benkeser & Keith Horvath & Cathy J. Reback & Joshua Rusow & Michael Hudgens, 2020. "Design and Analysis Considerations for a Sequentially Randomized HIV Prevention Trial," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(3), pages 446-467, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303578_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.