IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2014.301962_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supporting replication and scale-up of evidence-based home visiting programs: Assessing the implementation knowledge base

Author

Listed:
  • Paulsell, D.
  • Del Grosso, P.
  • Supplee, L.

Abstract

In recent years, researchers, policymakers, and practitioners have expressed a growing interest in the use of interventions with scientific evidence of effectiveness. Reproducing positive effects shown in research, however, requires more than simply adopting an evidence-based program. There is growing recognition across disciplines of the importance of implementation research to guide adoption, replication, and scale-up of evidence-based interventions. We evaluate the state of the knowledge base supporting replication and scale-up of evidence-based programs by reviewing information on implementation included in the research literature on 22 home visiting programs that have or are building an evidence base. We used the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation to assess programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulsell, D. & Del Grosso, P. & Supplee, L., 2014. "Supporting replication and scale-up of evidence-based home visiting programs: Assessing the implementation knowledge base," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(9), pages 1624-1632.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.301962_8
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301962
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dauber, Sarah & John, Tiffany & Hogue, Aaron & Nugent, Jessica & Hernandez, Gina, 2017. "Development and implementation of a screen-and-refer approach to addressing maternal depression, substance use, and intimate partner violence in home visiting clients," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 157-167.
    2. Robert Ammerman & Anne Duggan & John List & Lauren Supplee & Dana Suskind, 2021. "The role of open science practices in scaling evidence-based prevention programs," Natural Field Experiments 00741, The Field Experiments Website.
    3. Counts, Jacqueline M. & Gillam, Rebecca J. & Perico, Shabrie & Eggers, Keil L., 2017. "Lemonade for Life—A pilot study on a hope-infused, trauma-informed approach to help families understand their past and focus on the future," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 228-234.
    4. Goldberg, Jessica & Bumgarner, Erin & Jacobs, Francine, 2016. "Measuring program- and individual-level fidelity in a home visiting program for adolescent parents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 163-173.
    5. Wen, Xiaoli & Korfmacher, Jon & Hans, Sydney L., 2016. "Change over time in young mothers' engagement with a community-based doula home visiting program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 116-126.
    6. Eric Morris & Noelle Denny-Brown, "undated". "Expanding Integrated Employment: Early Lessons from Scaling Up Pathways to Careers," Mathematica Policy Research Reports fc12444e564e4ac2bd704c16a, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. Sarah A. Avellar & Jaime Thomas & Rebecca Kleinman & Emily Sama-Miller & Sara E. Woodruff & Rebecca Coughlin & T’Pring R. Westbrook, 2017. "External Validity: The Next Step for Systematic Reviews?," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(4), pages 283-325, August.
    8. Helen Lee & Sarah Shea Crowne & Melanie Estarziau & Keith Kranker & Charles Michalopoulos & Anne Warren & Tod Mijanovich & Jill H. Filene & Anne Duggan & Virginia Knox, "undated". "The Effects of Home Visiting on Prenatal Health, Birth Outcomes, and Health Care Use in the First Year of Life: Final Implementation and Impact Findings from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Progra," Mathematica Policy Research Reports a9626a8d90bf4f01811d0c9d7, Mathematica Policy Research.
    9. Diane Paulsell & Jaime Thomas & Shannon Monahan & Neil S. Seftor, 2017. "A Trusted Source of Information," Evaluation Review, , vol. 41(1), pages 50-77, February.
    10. Finders, Jennifer K. & Díaz, Guadalupe & Geldhof, G. John & Sektnan, Michaella & Rennekamp, Denise, 2016. "The impact of parenting education on parent and child behaviors: Moderators by income and ethnicity," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 199-209.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2014.301962_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.