IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apb/jabsss/2018p9-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of Shariah supervisory board on supervision and counselling in Shariah rural bank Mitra Cahaya Indonesia Yogyakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Selamat Muliadi

    (Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Nur Feriyanto

    (Islamic University of Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

Islamic banks underlie fundamental principles of the Shariah encompassing all business activities, financial contracts and transactions. The Shariah Supervisory Board (SSB) plays an important role in the Islamic banking system and it has an important impact on their performance and stability. The obedience of Shariah is an obligation which must be implemented each bank based on Shariah. The goal of the research is to determine the effectiveness of supervision and counselling in the implementation of Shariah principles by the SSB in Shariah Rural Bank Mitra Cahaya Indonesia Yogyakarta. As an independent agent of National Shariah Board-Indonesian Ulema Council works overseeing and has big responsibility. In overseeing new product, there are several steps being taken by the SSB, i.e., first, the SSB asked for an explanation from the board of directors of the new products that will be issued. Second, check if the new product is in accordance with the Islamic principles. Third, give an opinion on the Shariah's new product. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive data. Data were obtained through interviews, observation and literature review.The study concluded that the SSB is a significant department in Shariah Rural Bank Mitra Cahaya Indonesia Yogyakarta like the other departments. The interference of it in decision-making and management could adversely affect the Shariah Rural Bank Mitra Cahaya Indonesia Yogyakarta. In general, the supervision by the SSB in Shariah Rural Bank Mitra Cahaya Indonesia Yogyakarta has been effective because the SSB not only does the good supervision but also makes improvements and developments. The SSB monitor with his best ability and gives priority to the Shariah Rural Bank Mitra Cahaya Indonesia Yogyakarta.

Suggested Citation

  • Selamat Muliadi & Nur Feriyanto, 2018. "The effectiveness of Shariah supervisory board on supervision and counselling in Shariah rural bank Mitra Cahaya Indonesia Yogyakarta," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 4(1), pages 9-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2018:p:9-17
    DOI: 10.20474/jabs-4.1.2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/platform/Articles/full-jabs4.1.2.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://tafpublications.com/gip_content/paper/Jabs-4.1.2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20474/jabs-4.1.2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julia Merkel & Paul Jackson & Doreén Pick, 2006. "New Challenges in Retail Human Resource Management," Springer Books, in: Manfred Krafft & Murali K. Mantrala (ed.), Retailing in the 21st Century, pages 211-224, Springer.
    2. Renée B. Adams & Daniel Ferreira, 2007. "A Theory of Friendly Boards," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 217-250, February.
    3. Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2003. "Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: a survey of the economic literature," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 9(Apr), pages 7-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sahibzada Muhammad Wasim Jan, 2020. "Shari’ah Governance of Islamic Banking Institutions in Pakistan: An Analytical Overview," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 6(6), pages 286-299.
    2. Lia Dahlia Iryani* & Winwin Yadiati & Eddy Mulyadi Supardi & Iwan Triyuwono, 2019. "The Moderating Effect of Shariah Governance on Financial and Maqasid Shariah Performance: Evidence from Islamic Banks in Indonesia," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(2), pages 264-274, 02-2019.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benkraiem, Ramzi & Boubaker, Sabri & Brinette, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2021. "Board feminization and innovation through corporate venture capital investments: The moderating effects of independence and management skills," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Hoontaek Seo & Sangho Yi & William McCumber, 2024. "Friendly Boards and the Cost of Debt," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Clara Graziano & Annalisa Luporini, 2010. "Optimal Delegation when the Large Shareholder has Multiple Tasks," CESifo Working Paper Series 3028, CESifo.
    4. Lauren Cohen & Andrea Frazzini & Christopher J. Malloy, 2012. "Hiring Cheerleaders: Board Appointments of "Independent" Directors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1039-1058, June.
    5. Schwartz-Ziv, Miriam & Weisbach, Michael S., 2013. "What do boards really do? Evidence from minutes of board meetings☆☆Miriam Schwartz-Ziv is from Harvard University and Northeastern University, e-mail: miriam.schwartz@mail.huji.ac.il. Michael S. Weisb," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 349-366.
    6. Zhou, Yifan & Kara, Alper & Molyneux, Philip, 2019. "Chair-CEO generation gap and bank risk-taking," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 352-372.
    7. Sandvik, Jason, 2020. "Board monitoring, director connections, and credit quality☆," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Adams, Renée B. & Mehran, Hamid, 2012. "Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 243-267.
    9. To, Thomas & Wu, Eliza & Zhao, Diya, 2024. "Global board reforms and corporate acquisition performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. John R. Graham & Sonali Hazarika & Krishnamoorthy Narasimhan, 2011. "Corporate Governance, Debt, and Investment Policy During the Great Depression," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(12), pages 2083-2100, December.
    11. Vagliasindi, Maria, 2008. "The effectiveness of boards of directors of state owned enterprises in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4579, The World Bank.
    12. Renee B. Adams & Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2010. "The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 58-107, March.
    13. Phillip C. James, 2020. "Understanding the Impact of Board Structure on Firm Performance: AComprehensive Literature Review," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
    14. Volonté, Christophe, 2015. "Boards: Independent and committed directors?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 25-37.
    15. Pathan, Shams, 2009. "Strong boards, CEO power and bank risk-taking," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 1340-1350, July.
    16. Ron Bird & Peng Huang & Yue Lu, 2018. "Board independence and the variability of firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 3-26, February.
    17. Duchin, Ran & Matsusaka, John G. & Ozbas, Oguzhan, 2010. "When are outside directors effective?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 195-214, May.
    18. Kenneth M. Lehn & Sukesh Patro & Mengxin Zhao, 2009. "Determinants of the Size and Composition of US Corporate Boards: 1935‐2000," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 38(4), pages 747-780, December.
    19. Francesca Arnaboldi & Barbara Casu, 2012. "Corporate Governance in European Banking," Chapters, in: James R. Barth & Chen Lin & Clas Wihlborg (ed.), Research Handbook on International Banking and Governance, chapter 31, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Ivan Brick & N. Chidambaran, 2008. "Board monitoring, firm risk, and external regulation," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 87-116, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apb:jabsss:2018:p:9-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Dr. Usman Raja (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://tafpublications.com/platform/published_papers/9 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.