IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apa/ijtess/2016p5-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tesla Powerwall in the United States and Portugal–A Comparative Analysis on the Use of Storage with Small Scale Photovoltaic Systems

Author

Listed:
  • SANDY RODRIGUES

    (University of Madeira and Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute Funchal, Portugal)

  • FÁBIO FARIA

    (University of Madeira and Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute Funchal, Portugal)

  • ASHKAN IVAKI

    (University of Madeira and Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute Funchal, Portugal)

  • NUNO CAFÔFO

    (University of Madeira and Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute Funchal, Portugal)

  • XIAOJU CHEN 5

    (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, US)

  • F. MORGADO-DIAS

    (University of Madeira and Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute Funchal, Portugal)

Abstract

Recently Tesla announced their Powerwall solution to store energy in the residential sector, focusing on low cost storage, the use of photovoltaic systems and reduction of the electricity bills. The work presented in this paper analysis the use of this storage solution by comparing different scenarios in which Powerwall can be used. These scenarios compare different states of the United States of America and Portugal, considering the electricity prices and billing system in each of the regions. The potential savings provided by using the Powerwall result mainly from different hourly tariffs and in California it can be of 0.21€/kWh in the summer and 0.12€/kWh in the winter, in Hawaii it can be of 0.26€/kWh plus approximately 800€/year on fixed bill savings, in Alabama it can be of 0.10€/kWh and finally in Portugal it can be up to 0.19€/kWh, since all the cites or states practice different electricity prices as well as grid injection schemes. The scenarios considered for this work involve a 100% self-consumption regime in which grid injection is not considered even though it is allowed in some cities or states. To evaluate the economic impact of Power wall, different economic methods are used, such as the Profitability Index, the Internal Return Rate, and the Discounted Payback Period of the Investment. Other base economical parameters such as interest rate, maintenance and operations rate, inverter replacement rate, Powerwall Battery replacement, VAT tax rate, electricity evolution rate, electricity price, prices for a PV system connected to a Powerwall system, and PV degradation rate are also considered. The settings used for the evaluation are those of a residential location using a 2kW PV system connected to a 7kWh Powerwall Battery and they are considered for three scenarios as follows: Scenario 1 considers an on-grid PV system connected to a Powerwall battery both in the USA and in Portugal. In this scenario, Alabama state is used since only the selfconsumption scheme is practiced and there is no net-metering nor feed-in tariff schemes. The city of Aljustrel in Portugal is used in this scenario since a 100% self-consumption regime can be practiced there that is comparable with Alabama and this city has the highest solar radiation in the country. Scenario 2 contemplates an off-grid PV system connected to a Powerwall battery both in USA and in Portugal. In this scenario the state of Hawaii, which practices the highest electricity tariffs, is compared with the city of Aljustrel. Lastly, scenario 3 considers charging the Powerwall battery directly from the grid (without resorting to a PV system) in the super off-peak hours and using the Powerwall battery to feed the household grid in the on-peak hours both in USA and in Portugal. The state of California was chosen for USA since it practices the highest tri-hourly tariffs while Aljustrel city in Portugal practices the highest bi-hourly tariffs. The overall results show that Portugal is not attractive in any scenario while in several scenarios for the United States, considering the different states, the investment can be doubled or tripled, include with the use of the Powerwall without a PV system.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandy Rodrigues & Fábio Faria & Ashkan Ivaki & Nuno Cafôfo & Xiaoju Chen 5 & F. Morgado-Dias, 2016. "Tesla Powerwall in the United States and Portugal–A Comparative Analysis on the Use of Storage with Small Scale Photovoltaic Systems," International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor, vol. 2(1), pages 5-12.
  • Handle: RePEc:apa:ijtess:2016:p:5-12
    DOI: 10.20469/ijtes.2.40002-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/technology-engineering-studies-volume-2-issue1/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ijtes.2.40002-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20469/ijtes.2.40002-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Audenaert, Amaryllis & De Boeck, Liesje & De Cleyn, Sven & Lizin, Sebastien & Adam, Jean-François, 2010. "An economic evaluation of photovoltaic grid connected systems (PVGCS) in Flanders for companies: A generic model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2674-2682.
    2. Mani, Monto & Pillai, Rohit, 2010. "Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3124-3131, December.
    3. Audenaert, Amaryllis & De Boeck, Liesje & De Cleyn, Sven & Lizin, Sebastien & Adam, Jean-Franois, 2010. "An economic evaluation of photovoltaic grid connected systems (PVGCS) in Flanders for companies: a generic model," Working Papers 2010/16, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    4. Peng, Jinqing & Lu, Lin & Yang, Hongxing, 2013. "Review on life cycle assessment of energy payback and greenhouse gas emission of solar photovoltaic systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 255-274.
    5. Zweibel, Ken, 2010. "Should solar photovoltaics be deployed sooner because of long operating life at low, predictable cost?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 7519-7530, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodrigues, Sandy & Chen, Xiaoju & Morgado-Dias, F., 2017. "Economic analysis of photovoltaic systems for the residential market under China's new regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 467-472.
    2. Hee-Kwan Shin & Jae-Min Cho & Eul-Bum Lee, 2019. "Electrical Power Characteristics and Economic Analysis of Distributed Generation System Using Renewable Energy: Applied to Iron and Steel Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Yu-Cheol Jeong & Eul-Bum Lee & Douglas Alleman, 2019. "Reducing Voltage Volatility with Step Voltage Regulators: A Life-Cycle Cost Analysis of Korean Solar Photovoltaic Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Gopal, C. & Mohanraj, M. & Chandramohan, P. & Chandrasekar, P., 2013. "Renewable energy source water pumping systems—A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 351-370.
    5. Song, Zhe & Liu, Jia & Yang, Hongxing, 2021. "Air pollution and soiling implications for solar photovoltaic power generation: A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    6. Wang, Yue & Das, Ridoy & Putrus, Ghanim & Kotter, Richard, 2020. "Economic evaluation of photovoltaic and energy storage technologies for future domestic energy systems – A case study of the UK," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    7. Marcin Bukowski & Janusz Majewski & Agnieszka Sobolewska, 2020. "Macroeconomic Electric Energy Production Efficiency of Photovoltaic Panels in Single-Family Homes in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Olivier De Groote & Frank Verboven, 2019. "Subsidies and Time Discounting in New Technology Adoption: Evidence from Solar Photovoltaic Systems," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(6), pages 2137-2172, June.
    9. Olivier De Groote & Frank Verboven, 2016. "Subsidies and myopia in technology adoption: evidence from solar photovoltaic systems," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 547933, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    10. Lu, Hao & Lu, Lin & Wang, Yuanhao, 2016. "Numerical investigation of dust pollution on a solar photovoltaic (PV) system mounted on an isolated building," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 27-36.
    11. Attia, Ahmed M. & Al Hanbali, Ahmad & Saleh, Haitham H. & Alsawafy, Omar G. & Ghaithan, Ahmed M. & Mohammed, Awsan, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization model for sizing decisions of a grid-connected photovoltaic system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. Beliën, Jeroen & De Boeck, Liesje & Colpaert, Jan & Cooman, Gert, 2013. "The best time to invest in photovoltaic panels in Flanders," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 348-358.
    13. Twaha, Ssennoga & Idris, Mohd Hafizi & Anwari, Makbul & Khairuddin, Azhar, 2012. "Applying grid-connected photovoltaic system as alternative source of electricity to supplement hydro power instead of using diesel in Uganda," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 185-194.
    14. José de Castro Vieira, Samuel & Tapia Carpio, Lucio Guido, 2020. "The economic impact on residential fees associated with the expansion of grid-connected solar photovoltaic generators in Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1084-1098.
    15. Allan, Grant & Eromenko, Igor & Gilmartin, Michelle & Kockar, Ivana & McGregor, Peter, 2015. "The economics of distributed energy generation: A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 543-556.
    16. Lizin, Sebastien & Leroy, Julie & Delvenne, Catherine & Dijk, Marc & De Schepper, Ellen & Van Passel, Steven, 2013. "A patent landscape analysis for organic photovoltaic solar cells: Identifying the technology's development phase," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 5-11.
    17. Peprah, Forson & Gyamfi, Samuel & Effah-Donyina, Eric & Amo-Boateng, Mark, 2023. "The pathway for electricity prosumption in Ghana," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    18. Zografidou, Eleni & Petridis, Konstantinos & Petridis, Nikolaos E. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos, 2017. "A financial approach to renewable energy production in Greece using goal programming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 37-51.
    19. Sommerfeldt, Nelson & Madani, Hatef, 2017. "Revisiting the techno-economic analysis process for building-mounted, grid-connected solar photovoltaic systems: Part one – Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1379-1393.
    20. Andreas Schröder & Friedrich Kunz & Jan Meiss & Roman Mendelevitch & Christian von Hirschhausen, 2013. "Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050," Data Documentation 68, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apa:ijtess:2016:p:5-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://kkgpublications.com/technology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.