IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/apa/ijbaas/2016p62-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Business Process through Research

Author

Listed:
  • ALAKA ADEDAYO TAORID

    (Yaba College of Technology, Lagos State, Nigeria)

Abstract

Business process refers to series of activities including methods, tools, actors etc. that is involved in business operation with the goal of achieving the business objectives. It covers the daily operations of a business. These sequences of activities are meant to produce result meant to add values to customers as well as stakeholders. Effective business organization requires a continuous renewal of each step to ensure that the business meets the constant changes that is associated in the business world. Todays business arena, especially in the emerging economy, is in constant struggle with inadequate power supply and other resources needed for business development. More so, the influence of internet and social networking is presently changing the way people are doing business. Therefore, given the competitive nature in the business world, improving the efficiency of each step in the business process is essential for sustainability. Efficiency in business process could be enhanced using several measures. This study basically examined the extent to which business process can be enhanced through research. The study adopted a descriptive survey design and studied four multinational as well as four emerging business enterprises. The sample size of the study was forty (40) respondents selected across the top management staff of the chosen companies who possessed the required knowledge regarding the variables studied in this research. Questionnaire was used for data collection and data analysis was carried out using frequency count, percentages and chi-square. Findings from this study indicated that research is one area that is often neglected by most emerging business organizations. While multinational companies rely greatly on the outcome of research to make their business decisions; most emerging businesses, even though believe that research is essential, still considered research as a waste of resources given that they barely have enough fund to meet their business routine demand. The findings from this study also revealed that outcomes or results from research have the potential of enhancing operational efficiency in business. It also enhances the flexibility of business processes, as well as ensures innovation in business process. The study also revealed that research provides the tools needed in business to tackle societal challenges that affect business processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaka Adedayo Taorid, 2016. "Enhancing Business Process through Research," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 2(3), pages 62-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:apa:ijbaas:2016:p:62-69
    DOI: 10.20469/ijbas.2.10002-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/business-volume-2-issue-3-article2/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://kkgpublications.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/IJABS-2.10002-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20469/ijbas.2.10002-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrienn CZARL & Maria BELOVECZ, 2007. "Role of Research and Development in the 21st Century," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 0(4), pages 25-28.
    2. Julie M. Hite & William S. Hesterly, 2001. "The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 275-286, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    2. M. Kamil Kozan & Levent Akdeniz, 2014. "Role of Strong versus Weak Networks in Small Business Growth in an Emerging Economy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Jean–Luc Arregle & Bat Batjargal & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb & Toyah Miller & Anne S. Tsui, 2015. "Family Ties in Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks and New Venture Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 313-344, March.
    4. Busch, Christian & Barkema, Harry, 2022. "Align or perish: social enterprise network orchestration in Sub-Saharan Africa," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115350, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Leung, Aegean & Zhang, Jing & Wong, Poh Kam & Foo, Maw Der, 2006. "The use of networks in human resource acquisition for entrepreneurial firms: Multiple "fit" considerations," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 664-686, September.
    6. Petra Andries & Koenraad Debackere, 2007. "Adaptation and Performance in New Businesses: Understanding the Moderating Effects of Independence and Industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 81-99, June.
    7. Dean Patton & Susan Marlow, 2011. "University Technology Business Incubators: Helping New Entrepreneurial Firms to Learn to Grow," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(5), pages 911-926, October.
    8. Zhiang (John) Lin & James A. Kitts & Haibin Yang & J. Richard Harrison, 2008. "Elucidating strategic network dynamics through computational modeling," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 175-208, September.
    9. Susanna Slotte–Kock & Nicole Coviello, 2010. "Entrepreneurship Research on Network Processes: A Review and Ways Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 31-57, January.
    10. Miozzo, Marcela & DiVito, Lori, 2016. "Growing fast or slow?: Understanding the variety of paths and the speed of early growth of entrepreneurial science-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 964-986.
    11. Müge Özman, 2007. "Network Formation and Strategic Firm Behaviour to Explore and Exploit," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7.
    12. Johannes Kleinhempel & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Mariko J. Klasing, 2022. "The Changing Role of Social Capital During the Venture Creation Process: A Multilevel Study," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(2), pages 297-330, March.
    13. Lavlu Mozumdar & Geoffrey Hagelaar & Valentina C. Materia & S. W. F. Omta & Mohammad Amirul Islam & Gerben Velde, 2019. "Embeddedness or Over-Embeddedness? Women Entrepreneurs’ Networks and Their Influence on Business Performance," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(5), pages 1449-1469, December.
    14. Taheri, Mozhdeh & van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2019. "Knowledge relationships of university spin-off firms: Contrasting dynamics in global reach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 193-204.
    15. Maria Ripollés & Andreu Blesa, 2020. "And yet, non-equity cooperative entries do improve international performance: uncovering the role of networks’ social capital," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 761-776, October.
    16. Erik Lundmark & Anna Krzeminska & Dean A. Shepherd, 2019. "Images of Entrepreneurship: Exploring Root Metaphors and Expanding Upon Them," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 43(1), pages 138-170, January.
    17. Zhong Qin & Xin Deng, 2016. "Government and family Guanxi in Chinese private firms: perceptions and preference," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 35-60, January.
    18. Jan Abrahamsson & Håkan Boter & Vladimir Vanyushyn, 2015. "Continuing corporate growth and inter-organizational collaboration of international new ventures in Sweden," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Urban Gråsjö & Sofia Wixe (ed.), Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Global Economy, chapter 4, pages 89-116, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Lionel Nesta & Vincent Mangematin, 2002. "Industry Life Cycle, Knowledge Generation and Technological Networks," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03398092, HAL.
    20. John Sibley Butler & Rajiv Garg & Bryan Stephens, 2020. "Social Networks, Funding, and Regional Advantages in Technology Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 198-216, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:apa:ijbaas:2016:p:62-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://kkgpublications.com/business/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.