IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/journl/v2y2016i3p335-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precarious Employment Relations as a Factor of Social Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Fyodorova, Ð . E.
  • Katashinskikh, V. S.
  • Dvorakova, Z.

Abstract

The paper discusses the assessment of precarious employment relations as one of the systemic factors of social pollution. The social pollution phenomenon in employment relations is caused by employers who use a strategy for the reduction of labour costs and toxic practices of human resource management. This paper presents the intermediate outcomes of a longitudinal study based on the methods of survey, involving workers of Russian companies in different sectors of economy. In 2014, authors conducted a pilot study in order to test the methodological tools for assessing social pollution in employment relations, which included assessing the degree of precarization. This pilot study also allowed the authors to verify the hypotheses of their research and to improve the tools for further application in the survey which was conducted in 2015 among the staff members of enterprises in the Sverdlovsk region. Thus, the authors have managed to identify the precarization-related toxic elements of employment relations in these enterprises, which damaged the physical health and psychosocial well-being of the employees. This study has also brought to light a number of current trends in the employment relations in the region. Although the research results are somewhat limited due to the fact that such observations should be made repeatedly over a long period of time, intermediary conclusions might also be of interest and could be used to search for ways of dealing with problems caused by the growing precarization on the level of individual enterprises as well as on the level of the whole region.

Suggested Citation

  • Fyodorova, Ð . E. & Katashinskikh, V. S. & Dvorakova, Z., 2016. "Precarious Employment Relations as a Factor of Social Pollution," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 2(3), pages 335-343.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:335-343
    DOI: 10.15826/recon.2016.2.3.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10995/47043
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15826/recon.2016.2.3.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amrita Chhachhi & Guy Standing, 2014. "Understanding the Precariat through Labour and Work," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 963-980, September.
    2. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, 2010. "Building Sustainable Organizations: The Human Factor," Research Papers 2017r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alena Fedorova & Varvara Katashinskikh & Zuzana Dvorakova, 2016. "Precarious Labour Relations as a Factor of Social Pollution," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 802-814.
    2. Rodrigo Lozano & Maria Barreiro‐Gen, 2023. "Civil society organisations as agents for societal change: Football clubs' engagement with sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 820-828, March.
    3. Gabriele Giorgi & José M. León-Perez & Francesco Montani & Samuel Fernández-Salinero & Mar Ortiz-Gómez & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Giulio Arcangeli & Nicola Mucci, 2020. "Fear of Non-Employability and of Economic Crisis Increase Workplace Harassment through Lower Organizational Welfare Orientation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Musaddag Elrayah & Yahdih Semlali, 2023. "Sustainable Total Reward Strategies for Talented Employees’ Sustainable Performance, Satisfaction, and Motivation: Evidence from the Educational Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Ghulam Abid & Francoise Contreras & Saira Ahmed & Tehmina Qazi, 2019. "Contextual Factors and Organizational Commitment: Examining the Mediating Role of Thriving at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Mouzas, Stefanos, 2022. "What drives business transformation? Evidence from manufacturer-retailer networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 282-293.
    7. Jiang Min & Shuja Iqbal & Muhammad Aamir Shafique Khan & Shamim Akhtar & Farooq Anwar & Sikandar Ali Qalati, 2020. "Impact of supervisory behavior on sustainable employee performance: Mediation of conflict management strategies using PLS-SEM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Rothbart, Michah W. & Heflin, Colleen, 2023. "Inequality in literacy skills at kindergarten entry at the intersections of social programs and race," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Lena Bjørlo & Øystein Moen & Mark Pasquine, 2021. "The Role of Consumer Autonomy in Developing Sustainable AI: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Wan Rahim Wan Yunan & Aminah Ahmad & Zoharah Omar, 2017. "The Experience of Workplace Spirituality: Do Age and Educational Attainment Matter?," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(7), pages 61-69, July.
    11. Edyta Bombiak & Anna Marciniuk-Kluska, 2019. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management as a Concept of Fostering Sustainable Organization-Building: Experiences of Young Polish Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    12. Kristina A. Diekmann & Sheli D. Sillito Walker & Adam D. Galinsky & Ann E. Tenbrunsel, 2013. "Double Victimization in the Workplace: Why Observers Condemn Passive Victims of Sexual Harassment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 614-628, April.
    13. Riccardo Brozzi & David Forti & Erwin Rauch & Dominik T. Matt, 2020. "The Advantages of Industry 4.0 Applications for Sustainability: Results from a Sample of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    14. Bilal El TOUFAIL, 2018. "Consequences Of Organizational Stress On Workforce Productivity. Research On Strategies To Promote A Sustainable Workforce," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(2), pages 42-52, June.
    15. Fabien Martinez, 2014. "Corporate strategy and the environment: towards a four-dimensional compatibility model for fostering green management decisions," Post-Print hal-02887618, HAL.
    16. Hyun-Jung Kwon & Heaeun Oh & Jung Won Kong, 2022. "The Institutional Factors Affecting the Growth of Korean Migrant Care Market and Sustainability in Long-Term Care Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Kai-Chong Thong & Wai-Peng Wong, 2018. "Pathways for Sustainable Supply Chain Performance—Evidence from a Developing Country, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-26, August.
    18. Julia Benkert, 2021. "Reframing Business Sustainability Decision-Making with Value-Focussed Thinking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 441-456, November.
    19. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Asta Savanevičienė, 2018. "Raising the Curtain in People Management by Exploring How Sustainable HRM Translates to Practice: The Case of Lithuanian Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-31, November.
    20. Arjan Kozica & Ina Ehnert, 2014. "Lernen von Nachhaltigkeit: Exploration und Exploitation als Lernmodi einer vollständig ambidextren Organisation," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(68), pages 147-167, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:journl:v:2:y:2016:i:3:p:335-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Irina Turgel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.