IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v22y2023i4p789-813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Impact of Social Tax Deductions for Personal Income Tax on the Welfare and Inequality of Citizens in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey A. Pugachev

Abstract

The increase in the demand for social tax deductions for personal income tax and the increase in their limits, along with the need to overcome poverty and inequality in Russia, are enshrined in the 2023 Presidential Address, which determines the relevance of research on the impact of social tax deductions on welfare and income inequality. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of social tax deductions for personal income tax on the welfare and inequality of citizens in Russia. The hypothesis of the study is that the impact of social tax deductions for personal income tax on the welfare of citizens is insignificant; their impact potential is not realized. As part of the study, correlation and regression analysis was applied (the "Data Analysis" package in Excel): the influence of the share of social tax deductions in the amount of income from personal income tax (factor indicator) on indicators of well-being and inequality (resulting indicators) was estimated. The study uses statistical data from the Federal Tax Service, Rosstat and the database of the study of the transformation of inequality of citizens in Russia, conducted in 2022. As a result of the study, a close relationship was established between the share of social tax deductions in the total amount of personal income tax and indicators of inequality: the Gini coefficient and the quintile coefficient of funds, as well as the lack of connection with indicators of well-being. Social tax deductions smooth out the inequality of citizens to a certain extent, but they have no impact on the level of well-being. Strengthening the importance of social tax deductions for personal income tax is possible due to an increase in their limits. The directions of improving the provision of social tax deductions are differentiation of categories of recipients, indexation of deduction limits and simplification of the procedure for obtaining them. The theoretical significance of the study is to develop an assessment of the impact of social tax deductions on the welfare and inequality of citizens, as well as to enhance it, in comparison with the traditional approach, by analyzing the results of a sociological survey on the demand for deductions by taxpayers. The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of taking into account proposals for improving social tax deductions to smooth out inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey A. Pugachev, 2023. "Assessment of the Impact of Social Tax Deductions for Personal Income Tax on the Welfare and Inequality of Citizens in Russia," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 22(4), pages 789-813.
    • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:22:y:2023:i:4:p:789-813
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.4.032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2023/02_Pugachev.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.4.032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nezih Guner & Martin Lopez-Daneri & Gustavo Ventura, 2023. "The Looming Fiscal Reckoning: Tax Distortions, Top Earners, and Revenues," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 50, pages 146-170, October.
    2. Narciz Balasoiu & Iulian Chifu & Marian Oancea, 2023. "Impact of Direct Taxation on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence Based on Panel Data Regression Analysis at the Level of Eu Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-32, April.
    3. Philipp Doerrenberg & Andreas Peichl & Sebastian Siegloch, 2017. "The Elasticity of Taxable Income in the Presence of Deduction Possibilities," NBER Chapters, in: Personal Income Taxation and Household Behavior (TAPES), National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. François Bourguignon & Amedeo Spadaro, 2012. "Tax–benefit revealed social preferences," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 10(1), pages 75-108, March.
    5. Bruno Martorano, 2018. "Taxation and Inequality in Developing Countries: Lessons from the Recent Experience of Latin America," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 256-273, March.
    6. Koehne, Sebastian & Sachs, Dominik, 2022. "Pareto-improving reforms of tax deductions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Kessing, Sebastian G. & Lipatov, Vilen & Zoubek, J. Malte, 2020. "Optimal taxation under regional inequality," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman, 2018. "Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(2), pages 553-609.
    9. Wilkinson, Brett R. & Hageman, Amy M., 2023. "The role of political elites in income tax system design and tax fairness," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    10. Andre Gbato, 2017. "Impact of Taxation on Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: New Evidence Based on a New Data Set," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 173-193, November.
    11. Milyausha R. Pinskaya, 2015. "Approaches to understanding the tax equity," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 1(1), pages 90-99.
    12. William Gbohoui & Mr. Waikei R Lam & Victor Duarte Lledo, 2019. "The Great Divide: Regional Inequality and Fiscal Policy," IMF Working Papers 2019/088, International Monetary Fund.
    13. Flaviu Mihaescu & Liviu Voinea, 2009. "The Impact of the Flat Tax Reform on Inequality: The Case of Romania," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 81, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    14. Gbato, Andre, 2017. "Impact of taxation on growth in Subsaharan Africa: new evidence based on a new data set," MPRA Paper 80903, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Serocki, James S. & Murphy, Kevin J., 2009. "An analysis of the medical expense deduction under the U.S. income tax system," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 343-356, May.
    16. Igor A. Mayburov, 2015. "Marking the centenary of income tax in Russia: theoretical analysis of key stages of the reform," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 1(2-3), pages 161-176.
    17. Taro Ohno & Junpei Sakamaki & Author-Name:Daizo Kojima, 2021. "Effects of Deductions on the Tax Burden Reduction and the Redistribution of the Income and Resident Taxes," Discussion papers ron338, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
    18. Simona ILIE, 2020. "Income Inequalities in Romania in the Aftermath of the 2008 Economic Crisis," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 115-130, July.
    19. Stoyan Tanchev, 2021. "How the proportional income taxation increases inequality in Bulgaria," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 7(3), pages 244-254.
    20. Georgy A. Borshchevskiy & Nodar Z. Mossaki, 2021. "Development of the tax administration in Russia: Results and prospects," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 7(2), pages 114-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Støstad, Morten Nyborg & Cowell, Frank, 2024. "Inequality as an externality: consequences for tax design," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 123752, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Andrey A. Pugachev, 2022. "Taxation-Based Indicators as a Measure of Income Inequality in Russian Regions," Journal of Tax Reform, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 8(1), pages 40-53.
    3. Andrey A. Pugachev, 2023. "Impact of the Level and Structure of the Tax Burden on Citizens Inequality," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 3, pages 59-77, June.
    4. Michaël Sicsic, 2022. "Does labour income react more to income tax or means‐tested benefits reforms?," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 291-319, September.
    5. Chiad, Faycal, 2022. "أثر الضرائب على الاستثمار والنمو الاقتصادي في الدول العربية: دراسة تحليلية قياسية [The impact of taxes on investment and economic growth in the Arab countries: Analytical and Econometric Study]," MPRA Paper 114425, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Ole Agersnap & Owen Zidar, 2021. "The Tax Elasticity of Capital Gains and Revenue-Maximizing Rates," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(4), pages 399-416, December.
    7. Felix J. Bierbrauer & Pierre C. Boyer & Emanuel Hansen, 2023. "Pareto‐Improving Tax Reforms and the Earned Income Tax Credit," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(3), pages 1077-1103, May.
    8. Ferey, Antoine & Haufler, Andreas & Perroni, Carlo, 2023. "Incentives, globalization, and redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. J. Malte Zoubek, 2018. "Spatial Productivity Differences and the Optimal Tax Treatment of Commuting Expenses," Volkswirtschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 187-18, Universität Siegen, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht.
    10. Støstad, Morten Nyborg & Cowell, Frank, 2024. "Inequality as an externality: Consequences for tax design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Johannes Hermle & Andreas Peichl, 2018. "Jointly Optimal Taxes for Different Types of Income," CESifo Working Paper Series 7248, CESifo.
    12. Andre Gbato & Falapalaki Lemou & Jean-François Brun, 2021. "Effectiveness of SARA reform in sub-Saharan Africa [Efficacité de la réforme des SARA en Afrique subsaharienne]," Working Papers hal-03119001, HAL.
    13. Yaru, Mohammed Aminu & Adisa-Ohiaka, Ubaydah, 2022. "Indirect Taxation and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Empirical Evidence from Panel Data Analysis," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(5), December.
    14. Wheadon, Daniel & Castex, Gonzalo & Kudrna, George & Woodland, Alan, 2024. "Non-linear means-tested pensions: Welfare and distributional analyses," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Larrimore, Jeff & Splinter, David, 2019. "How much does health insurance cost? Comparison of premiums in administrative and survey data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 132-135.
    16. Thomas Blanchet & Lucas Chancel & Amory Gethin, 2019. "How Unequal is Europe? Evidence from Distributional National Accounts, 1980-2017," World Inequality Lab Working Papers hal-02877000, HAL.
    17. Diego Winkelried & Bruno Escobar, 2022. "Declining inequality in Latin America? Robustness checks for Peru," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(1), pages 223-243, March.
    18. Landry, Joel R., 2021. "The political allocation of green pork and its implications for federal climate policy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    19. Moritz Drechsel-Grau & Fabian Greimel, 2018. "Falling Behind: Has Rising Inequality Fueled the American Debt Boom?," 2018 Meeting Papers 1032, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. Mark Huggett & Wenlan Luo, 2023. "Optimal Income Taxation: An Urban Economics Perspective," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 847-866, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    inequality of citizens; welfare of citizens; personal income tax; tax benefits; social tax deductions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:22:y:2023:i:4:p:789-813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.