IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/journl/v15y2022i1p135-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of the Phenomenon and Formation Mechanism of Cultural Differences between the United States and China

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Sun

    (School of Management, Jinan University (JNU), Guangzhou, China.)

Abstract

America and China have different cultures. For example, Chinese culture emphasizes the group, while American culture emphasizes the individual. Chinese culture emphasizes integration, while American culture emphasizes analysis. In addition, there are differences in customs, religious beliefs, and nonverbal communication between the United States and China. This article examines the cultural differences between China and the United States in historical geography, traditional thought, cognitive systems, and language. In the following, I will explain and discuss the reasons for the cultural differences between China and America. The author hopes this article will be helpful for readers interested in cultural differences between China and the United States and global trade exchanges.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Sun, 2022. "A Review of the Phenomenon and Formation Mechanism of Cultural Differences between the United States and China," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 15(1), pages 135-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:135-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsab.com/volume-15-issue-1/5326
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne S. Tsui & Peter McKiernan, 2022. "Understanding Scientific Freedom and Scientific Responsibility in Business and Management Research," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1604-1627, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lina Long, 2024. "Exploring the Role of Self-Efficacy and Employability in Predicting Turnover Intention among Post-90s Employees," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 38(1), pages 165-187.
    2. Wei Zhang, 2024. "Driving Competitive Advantage: A Study of Dynamic Capability and Digital Maturity in the Electronic Manufacturing Industry," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 39(1), pages 1-21.
    3. Peng Sun, 2022. "A Review of the Business Culture Differences between Canada and China," Journal of Scientific Reports, IJSAB International, vol. 4(1), pages 13-22.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herman Aguinis & Donald Bergh & José F. Molina-Azorin, 2023. "Methodological challenges and insights for future international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(2), pages 219-232, March.
    2. Herman Aguinis & Estelle E. Archibold & Darryl B. Rice, 2022. "Let’s Fix our Own Problem: Quelling the Irresponsible Research Perfect Storm," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1628-1642, September.
    3. Gideon D. Markman, 2022. "Will your Study Make the World A Better Place?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1597-1603, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:journl:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:135-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.