IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahs/journl/v6y2021i1p201-215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Esdp To Today’S New Initiatives: Does Neofunctionalism Work?

Author

Listed:
  • Sıla Turaç Baykara

Abstract

The ESDP is always one of the most significant policies of the EU for shaping both foreign relations and the integration process. After security and defense issues have become more important due to political developments since the beginning of 2000s, the ESDP has started to move towards the CSDP. From ESDP to CSDP and today's new initiatives, the EU has taken good steps for further integration. Although new tools brought by the Lisbon Treaty like mutual defense and solidarity clauses and new initiatives which aim to move the CSDP one step further such as EUGS, PESCO, and EDF could lead to long-term results in bolstering the EU's defense capabilities, EU Member States ask for cooperation efficiently in research and acquiring new military capabilities. Analyzing the period from the ESDP to the CSDP by applying neofunctionalist integration theory with a particular focus on new tools and initiatives launched after the Lisbon Treaty came into force, this paper aims to demonstrate that even the pauses in further integration efforts in the defense security and defense issues take place, the EU is continuing to follow a possessed path going to a common security and defense policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sıla Turaç Baykara, 2021. "From Esdp To Today’S New Initiatives: Does Neofunctionalism Work?," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 6(1), pages 201-215.
    • Handle: RePEc:ahs:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:201-215
    DOI: 10.30784/epfad.852018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1482909
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30784/epfad.852018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haas, Ernst B., 1961. "International Integration: The European and the Universal Process," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 366-392, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haroldo Ramanzini Junior & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2021. "Regional (dis)integration beyond governments: A comparison in social and civil society participation between Mercosur and SADC," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 18-34, March.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:993-1013 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Fligstein, Neil & Polyakova, Alina & Sandholtz, Wayne, 2011. "European Integration, Nationalism, and European Identity," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt1h47s4ck, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    4. Ferdj Younes, 2024. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on regional economic integration in the Maghreb region – an Algerian perspective," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 290-313.
    5. Azusa Uji & Sijeong Lim & Jaehyun Song, 2024. "From plastic to peace: Overcoming public antipathy through environmental cooperation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(2), pages 279-293, March.
    6. Lisbet Hooghe & Gary Marks, 2005. "The Neofunctionalists Were (almost) Right: Politicization and European Integration," The Constitutionalism Web-Papers p0024, University of Hamburg, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Social Sciences, Institute of Political Science.
    7. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:945-965 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Charles Boehmer & Timothy Nordstrom, 2008. "Intergovernmental Organization Memberships: Examining Political Community and the Attributes of International Organizations," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 282-309, November.
    9. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    10. Brian Efird & Gaspare M. Genna, 2002. "Structural Conditions and the Propensity for Regional Integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 267-295, September.
    11. Jana Bernhardt & Marina Steininger, 2021. "Gaia-X – Wegbereiter einer digitalen und wettbewerbsfähigen Zukunft der EU?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(05), pages 66-71, May.
    12. Bálint L. TÓTH, 2019. "The Visegrád Group and the railway development interest articulation in Central Eastern Europe," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10, pages 175-195, December.
    13. Madalin Blidaru, 2022. "The EU's Eastern void: mapping non-cooperation between the European Union and the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 31(1), pages 700-713, May.
    14. Godehardt, Nadine & Lembcke, Oliver W., 2010. "Regionale Ordnungen in politischen Räumen. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie regionaler Ordnungen [Regional Orders in Political Spaces. A Contribution to the Theory of Regional Orders]," GIGA Working Papers 124, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    15. Daniel Innerarity, 2014. "Does Europe Need a Demos to Be Truly Democratic?," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 7, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    16. Manuel Enverga, 2018. "Comparing ASEAN and the EU’s implementation of cultural projects: a historical institutionalist analysis," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 65-80, March.
    17. Colin W. Lawson & John Hudson, 2015. "Who Is Anti-American in the European Union?," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, May.
    18. Jordi Mas, 2021. "The Power of Cohesiveness: Internal Factors that Influence the External Performance of Regions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 963-980, July.
    19. Prof. Thomas Kaydor, Jr., 2024. "Reconceptualizing Africa’s Regional Integration for Peace and Sustainable Development: A Summary Analysisof PhD Dissertation," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 1756-1776, July.
    20. Taku Yukawa, 2018. "European integration through the eyes of ASEAN: Rethinking Eurocentrism in comparative regionalism," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 323-339, December.
    21. Joseph Kwabena Manboah-Rockson, Ph.D., 2021. "Launch of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) within Agenda 2063: an assessment of the ‘Actorness’ of the African Union (AU) in International Relations (IR)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(1), pages 278-286, January.
    22. Miroslava Scholten & Daniel Scholten, 2017. "From Regulation to Enforcement in the EU Policy Cycle: A New Type of Functional Spillover?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 925-942, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ESDP; CSDP; Neofunctionalism; Lisbon Treaty;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F59 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - Other
    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahs:journl:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:201-215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ersan Ersoy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://epfjournal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.