IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intare/v24y2021i1p18-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional (dis)integration beyond governments: A comparison in social and civil society participation between Mercosur and SADC

Author

Listed:
  • Haroldo Ramanzini Junior

    (Federal University of Uberlandia, Brazil)

  • Bruno Theodoro Luciano

    (UNESP, Brazil)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse the involvement of civil society in regional integration organizations through a comparative analysis of social/civil society channels in the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC). We seek to analyse the level of openness and the trajectory of both blocs in relation to civil society participation. The instruments and strategies employed by civil society actors in both regions are contrasted, aiming to understand how prominent and successful they have been in terms of influencing the decision-making processes of Mercosur and the SADC, which have been traditionally marked by their intergovernmental and interpresidential characters. We argue that civil society involvement in regionalism is shaped by regional institutional design, member states’ support for societal participation and civil society resources. Thus, this article seeks to contribute to the comparative regionalism literature, setting out an analytical comparative framework for assessing the role of civil society in regional organizations from the Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Haroldo Ramanzini Junior & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2021. "Regional (dis)integration beyond governments: A comparison in social and civil society participation between Mercosur and SADC," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 18-34, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:18-34
    DOI: 10.1177/22338659211005587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22338659211005587
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22338659211005587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haas, Ernst B., 1961. "International Integration: The European and the Universal Process," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 366-392, July.
    2. Haroldo Ramanzini Júnior & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2020. "Regionalism in the Global South: Mercosur and ECOWAS in trade and democracy protection," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(9), pages 1498-1517, September.
    3. Jens-Uwe Wunderlich, 2012. "The EU an Actor Sui Generis? A Comparison of EU and ASEAN Actorness," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 653-669, July.
    4. Hulse, Merran & Gürth, Lisa & Kavsek, Helena & Stauber, Verena & Wegner, Daniel & Weinreich, Jan, 2018. "Civil society engagement in regional governance: a network analysis in Southern Africa," IDOS Discussion Papers 30/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Anna Van Der Vleuten & Andrea Ribeiro Hoffmann, 2010. "Explaining the Enforcement of Democracy by Regional Organizations: Comparing EU, Mercosur and SADC," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 737-758, June.
    6. Lorenzo Fioramonti & Frank Mattheis, 2016. "Is Africa Really Following Europe? An Integrated Framework for Comparative Regionalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 674-690, May.
    7. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:737-758 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    2. Jürgen Rüland, 2018. "Coping with crisis: Southeast Asian regionalism and the ideational constraints of reform," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 155-168, June.
    3. repec:ocp:rpagri:pp_14-21 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Manuel Enverga, 2018. "Comparing ASEAN and the EU’s implementation of cultural projects: a historical institutionalist analysis," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 65-80, March.
    5. Thomas Gehring & Sebastian Oberthür & Marc Mühleck, 2013. "European Union Actorness in International Institutions: Why the EU is Recognized as an Actor in Some International Institutions, but Not in Others," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 849-865, September.
    6. S C A El Maaly, 2022. "What the Analysis of 136 Studies from 1960 to 2020 Tells Us About Comparative Regionalism Studies," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 27(2), pages 31-85, September.
    7. Tracy Ledger, 2019. "Charity begins at home: The political economy of non-tariff barriers to trade in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-61, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. Mayer, Sebastian, 2006. "TACIS and EU's security of energy supply: the Commission as a strategic actor in external relations," TranState Working Papers 46, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    9. Ummu Salma Bava, 2017. "India and the Global Order," International Studies, , vol. 54(1-4), pages 22-41, January.
    10. Sıla Turaç Baykara, 2021. "From Esdp To Today’S New Initiatives: Does Neofunctionalism Work?," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 6(1), pages 201-215.
    11. Jacklyne Achieng' Aput & Anita Ndoti Kiamba & Peter Kagwanja, 2023. "Public Diplomacy in Regional Integration: Strategizing Policy Goals," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(10), pages 368-384, October.
    12. Steffen Murau & Kilian Spandler, 2016. "EU, US and ASEAN Actorness in G20 Financial Policy‐Making: Bridging the EU Studies–New Regionalism Divide," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 928-943, July.
    13. Emilie M. Hafner-Burton & Alexander H. Montgomery, 2008. "Power or Plenty," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 52(2), pages 213-242, April.
    14. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:993-1013 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Henrik Larsen, 2020. "Normative Power Europe or Capability–expectations Gap? The Performativity of Concepts in the Study of European Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 962-977, July.
    16. Azusa Uji & Sijeong Lim & Jaehyun Song, 2024. "From plastic to peace: Overcoming public antipathy through environmental cooperation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(2), pages 279-293, March.
    17. Charles Boehmer & Timothy Nordstrom, 2008. "Intergovernmental Organization Memberships: Examining Political Community and the Attributes of International Organizations," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 282-309, November.
    18. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    19. Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, 2024. "Expanding the study of the EU-centred actorness: ASEAN in the emerging Indo-Pacific construct," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 103-119, March.
    20. Sara Kahn-Nisser, 2013. "Conditionality, Communication and Compliance: The Effect of Monitoring on Collective Labour Rights in Candidate Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(6), pages 1040-1056, November.
    21. Daniel Innerarity, 2014. "Does Europe Need a Demos to Be Truly Democratic?," Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series of the London School of Economics (LEQs) 7, London School of Economics / European Institute.
    22. Diana Panke, 2020. "Regional cooperation through the lenses of states: Why do states nurture regional integration?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 475-504, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intare:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:18-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hufs.ac.kr/user/hufsenglish/re_1.jsp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.