IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahc/journl/y2022id1611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the social capital of the organization: problems of the practical application of the new paradigm of management and the ways of their solution

Author

Listed:
  • B. A. B. Balchat
  • A. Z. Gusov

Abstract

The publication examines the theoretical aspects and practical problems of social capital management at the corporate level. The concept of social capital, its differences from other aspects of the management of intangible capital of modern organizations is presented. The reasons for insufficient attention to social capital management in the practice of corporate management have been clarified. Based on the results of the analysis of social reporting of 18 largest companies–leaders in key sectors of the economy, it is shown that key corporate entities acting as drivers of the socio–economic development of the Russian Federation are not involved in the practice of social capital management. The directions of social capital management are substantiated, the place in the ESG system is determined, and the directions for assessing social capital are proposed. It is concluded that, despite insufficient practical development, social capital management is intended to become a promising and significant area of corporate management in the ESG direction.

Suggested Citation

  • B. A. B. Balchat & A. Z. Gusov, 2022. "Managing the social capital of the organization: problems of the practical application of the new paradigm of management and the ways of their solution," Entrepreneur’s Guide, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 15(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2022:id:1611
    DOI: 10.24182/2073-9885-2022-15-1-107-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pp-mag.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1611/1578
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24182/2073-9885-2022-15-1-107-113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baruch Lev & Christine Petrovits & Suresh Radhakrishnan, 2010. "Is doing good good for you? how corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 182-200, February.
    2. Incheol Kim & Hong Wan & Bin Wang & Tina Yang, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence from Toxics Release Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4901-4926, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui-Cheng Yu & Lopin Kuo, 2021. "Corporate Philanthropy Strategy and Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Johnny Jermias, 2022. "The influence of governance structure on the relationship between pay ratio and environmental and social performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2992-3013, November.
    3. Nara Jeong, 2020. "The impact of two types of CEO overcompensation on corporate social responsibility," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(3), pages 749-767, September.
    4. Jaroslava Hyršlová & Pavel Tomšík & Lucie Vnoučková, 2017. "Relation between Sustainability-Related Communication and Competitiveness in the Chemical Industry," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(1), pages 283-292.
    5. Frederique Bardinet Evraert & Serge Evraert, 2019. "Do the ESG scores help to select the most successful companies?," Post-Print hal-03227627, HAL.
    6. Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Yongtae Kim, 2017. "Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(3), pages 360-385, April.
    7. Raffaele Morandi Stagni & Andrea Fosfuri & Juan Santaló, 2021. "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush: Technology search strategies and competition due to import penetration," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(8), pages 1516-1544, August.
    8. Eichholtz, Piet & Kok, Nils & Yonder, Erkan, 2012. "Portfolio greenness and the financial performance of REITs," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(7), pages 1911-1929.
    9. Lu Zhang & Yuan George Shan & Millicent Chang, 2021. "Can CSR Disclosure Protect Firm Reputation During Financial Restatements?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 157-184, September.
    10. Kiyoung Chang & Hoje Jo & Ying Li, 2018. "Is there Informational Value in Corporate Giving?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 473-496, August.
    11. Karel Hrazdil & Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Jamal A. Nazari, 2021. "Executive personality and sustainability: Do extraverted chief executive officers improve corporate social responsibility?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1564-1578, November.
    12. Lai Van Vo & Huong Thi Thu Le & Youngbin Kim, 2023. "Board interlocks, career prospects and corporate social responsibility," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4565-4595, December.
    13. Liu, Shaohui & Liu, Chuanjiang & Yang, Mian, 2021. "The effects of national environmental information disclosure program on the upgradation of regional industrial structure: Evidence from 286 prefecture-level cities in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 552-561.
    14. Tao Zeng, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Tax Aggressiveness, and Firm Market Value," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 7-30, March.
    15. Hao Liang & Luc Renneboog, 2017. "Corporate donations and shareholder value," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 278-316.
    16. Manseek Choi & Soonwook Hong, 2022. "Another Form of Greenwashing: The Effects of Chaebol Firms’ Corporate Governance Performance on the Donations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    17. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    18. Zuo, Junqing & Zhang, Wei & Ruan, Chenghao & Xiong, Xiong, 2024. "A blessing or a curse? Non-local mutual fund holdings and firm investment efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Christopher Groening & Vamsi K. Kanuri, 2018. "Investor Reactions to Concurrent Positive and Negative Stakeholder News," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(4), pages 833-856, June.
    20. Ellen Pei‐yi Yu & Alessandra Tanda & Bac Van Luu & Dominic H. Chai, 2021. "Environmental transparency and investors' risk perception: Cross‐country evidence on multinational corporations' sustainability practices and cost of equity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 3975-4000, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahc:journl:y:2022:id:1611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.