IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersfr/266091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers Respond to Information About Pesticide Residues

Author

Listed:
  • Eom, Young Sook

Abstract

Food safety experts rank foodborne disease due to microorganisms as the greatest health risk from the food supply. Yet for consumers, pesticide residues on fresh produce are a major food safety concern. The Packer trade magazine re-- ported that some consumers altered their buying habits between 1989 and 1990 because of concerns about pesticide residues on fresh produce, although changes were not dramatic. On the other hand, more than half of consumers responding to a 1989 University of Georgia survey said they maintained their purchase patterns for fresh produce, even though they perceived high risks from pesticide residues and desired some assurance of the produce's safety. The apparent contrast between attitudes and behaviors concerning pesticide residues gives confusing signals to food marketers and regulatory policymakers. Researchers at North Carolina State University conducted a consumer survey to gain information on how consumers trade off health risks with price. The researchers found that many consumers were willing to shift to produce that had been tested for residues after they received information about pesticide residues. But their willingness to shift depended on the price difference between the tested and untested produce and their education level.

Suggested Citation

  • Eom, Young Sook, 1992. "Consumers Respond to Information About Pesticide Residues," Food Review/ National Food Review, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 15(3), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266091
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.266091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266091/files/FoodReview-092.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/266091/files/FoodReview-092.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.266091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isaac Maina Kariuki & Jensā€Peter Loy, 2016. "Contractual Farming Arrangements, Quality Control, Incentives, and Distribution Failure in Kenya's Smallholder Horticulture: A Multivariate Probit Analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 547-562, November.
    2. Estes, Edmund A. & Smith, V. Kerry, 1996. "Price, Quality, And Pesticide Related Health Risk Considerations In Fruit And Vegetable Purchases: An Hedonic Analysis Of Tucson, Arizona Supermarkets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(3), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Batie, Sandra S. & Swinton, Scott M. & Schulz, Mary A., 1999. "Fqpa Implementation To Reduce Pesticide Residue Risks: Part I: Agricultural Producer Concerns," Staff Paper Series 11813, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersfr:266091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.