IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/uersaw/302616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lower Conventional Corn Prices and Strong Demand for Organic Livestock Feed Spurred Increased U.S. Organic Corn Production in 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Greene, Catherine
  • Vilorio, Dennis

Abstract

Converting from conventional to organic production systems requires the use of approved practices in every phase of crop production. In addition, farmers cannot be certified organic until 3 years after they have adopted organic practices. These organic requirements may decrease crop yields and increase labor requirements. However, organic price premiums help offset the cost of organic production.

Suggested Citation

  • Greene, Catherine & Vilorio, Dennis, 2018. "Lower Conventional Corn Prices and Strong Demand for Organic Livestock Feed Spurred Increased U.S. Organic Corn Production in 2016," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 0(05), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersaw:302616
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302616/files/USDA%20ERS%20-%20Lower%20Conventional%20Corn%20Prices%20and%20Strong%20Demand%20for%20Organic%20Livestock%20Feed%20Spurred%20Increased%20U.S.%20Organic%20Corn%20Production%20in%202016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Langemeier, Michael, . "Conventional and Organic Enterprise Net Returns," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 13(159).
    2. Michael R. Langemeier & Xiaoyi Fang & Michael O’Donnell, 2020. "Comparison of Long-Run Net Returns of Conventional and Organic Crop Rotations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-7, September.
    3. Langemeier, Michael & Fang, Xiaoyi, . "Comparison of Conventional and Organic Crop Rotations," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 10(103).
    4. Langemeier, Michael & Fang, Xiaoyi, . "Comparison of a Conventional Crop Rotation with an Organic Forage-Based Crop Rotation," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 10(122).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersaw:302616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.