IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/341004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

¿Qué tipos de métodos de extensión prefieren y usan los extensionistas rurales? Comparación internacional y construcción de una tipología de acuerdo a sus métodos

Author

Listed:
  • Landini, Fernando Pablo
  • Gallardo-López, Felipe

Abstract

In contrast to the wide corpus of literature aimed at discussing different extension approaches or philosophies, there is scarce interest in the analysis of methods of rural extension. This quantitative study analyzes the types of rural extension methods that rural extension agents from nine countries prefer and use, and explores the relationship between the types of methods and extension agents’ sociodemographic characteristics. Group methods are the most preferred and used, followed by individual ones. Interinstitutional coordination and mass media methods occupy third and fourth place respectively, in terms of preference and use. An important divergence between preferred and most used methods was identified. Results show the existence of three types of extension agents in terms of their extension methods, one focusing on individual and group work with farmers, and the other two which prioritize or relegate individual or group methods (depending on the case) and complement them with inter-institutional coordination ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Landini, Fernando Pablo & Gallardo-López, Felipe, 2022. "¿Qué tipos de métodos de extensión prefieren y usan los extensionistas rurales? Comparación internacional y construcción de una tipología de acuerdo a sus métodos," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 60(3), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341004
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.341004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/341004/files/Fernando%20Pablo%20Landini.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.341004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, Kristin E., ed. & Babu, Suresh Chandra, ed. & Ragasa, Catherine, ed., 2020. "Agricultural extension: Global status and performance in selected countries," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 9780896293755.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Ragasa & Cristina Alvarez-Mingote & Paul McNamara, 2024. "Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption: Multi-level Analysis from Malawi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1093-1146, October.
    2. Ramírez, Claudia Marcela Castaño & Rodríguez-Espinosa, Holmes & Pérez, Rosa Elsa, 2024. "Extensionist competencies index: a tool for the development of extensionist capacities?," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 62(1), January.
    3. CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM), 2021. "Technological innovation and sustainable intensification: Highlights, lessons learned, and priorities for One CGIAR," PIM flagship insights 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Lecoutere, Els & Spielman, David J. & Van Campenhout, Bjorn, 2023. "Empowering women through targeting information or role models: Evidence from an experiment in agricultural extension in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Fuglie, Keith O. & Morgan, Stephen & Jelliffe, Jeremy, 2024. "World Agricultural Production, Resource Use, and Productivity, 1961–2020," Economic Information Bulletin 341638, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Kassem, Hazem S. & Alotaibi, Bader Alhafi & Muddassir, Muhammad & Herab, Ahmed, 2021. "Factors influencing farmers’ satisfaction with the quality of agricultural extension services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Yitayew, Asresu & Abdulai, Awudu & Yigezu, Yigezu A., 2023. "The effects of advisory services and technology channeling on farm yields and technical efficiency of wheat farmers in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Hari Sankar Nayak & Andrew J. McDonald & Virender Kumar & Peter Craufurd & Shantanu Kumar Dubey & Amaresh Kumar Nayak & Chiter Mal Parihar & Panneerselvam Peramaiyan & Shishpal Poonia & Kindie Tesfaye, 2024. "Context-dependent agricultural intensification pathways to increase rice production in India," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Witinok-Huber, Rebecca & Radil, Steven M., 2021. "Introducing the Local Agricultural Potential Index: An approach to understand local agricultural extension impact for farmer adaptive capacity and gender equity," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:341004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.