IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/revi24/340845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ordenamiento territorial agropecuario en micro territorios. Caso del Río Limón, en el Alto Catatumbo (Colombia)

Author

Listed:
  • Jácome, Juan Carlos Santiago
  • Escobar, Carlos Humberto González
  • Torres, Juan Carlos Granobles

Abstract

Based on the concern about what territorial factors can be determinant in a process of Agricultural Territorial Planning (OTA) in the Limón River sub-basin, a micro-territory in Alto Catatumbo, in the northeast of Colombia, it was carried out, through the application of techniques of qualitative and quantitative evaluation, a review of the conditions of Rural Territorial Development (DTR), Territorial Governance (GT), performance of Agricultural Production Systems (SPA), Environmental conflicts and Territorial Tensions. The sub-basin is an area shared between three municipalities and two departments, it has a population of around five thousand inhabitants, mostly rural. Agricultural production is its main economic activity and the source of a strong conflict over land and water use. Composite indices of DTR, GT and SPA performance were prepared and applied, olso environmental reports and municipal planning documents were reviewed. The results indicate that the determining factors of the OTA in the sub-basin are related to low levels of social conditions and a weak Territorial Governance, confirm the high conflicts of land and water use and raise the need to objectively define the long-term vision of the territory.

Suggested Citation

  • Jácome, Juan Carlos Santiago & Escobar, Carlos Humberto González & Torres, Juan Carlos Granobles, 2024. "Ordenamiento territorial agropecuario en micro territorios. Caso del Río Limón, en el Alto Catatumbo (Colombia)," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 62(2), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:340845
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340845/files/Juan%20Carlos%20Santiago%20J%C3%A1come.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. Abreu & J. M. Nunes & F. J. Mesias, 2019. "Can Rural Development Be Measured? Design and Application of a Synthetic Index to Portuguese Municipalities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 1107-1123, October.
    2. Mauro Francini & Lucia Chieffallo & Annunziata Palermo & Maria Francesca Viapiana, 2020. "Estimation of the Smart Land Index: application to the rural context of the Crati Valley," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 749-770, April.
    3. James Robinson, 2016. "La miseria en Colombia," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, vol. 76, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weiwei Li & Ping Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Hua Chen & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "The Evolution Model of and Factors Influencing Digital Villages: Evidence from Guangxi, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Žana Jurjević & Bojan Matkovski & Danilo Đokić & Stanislav Zekić, 2024. "A Methodological Framework for Evaluation of Rural Settlements: Rural Index of Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Romero-Castro, N. & López-Cabarcos, M.A. & Piñeiro-Chousa, J., 2023. "Finance, technology, and values: A configurational approach to the analysis of rural entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    4. Leopoldo Fergusson & Pablo Querubin & Nelson A. Ruiz & Juan F. Vargas, 2021. "The Real Winner's Curse," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 52-68, January.
    5. Enxiang Cai & Shihong Long & Ling Li & Ying Luo & Liling Ge & Weiqiang Chen & Guoquan Li, 2024. "Optimization of Rural Residential Areas in Flood Detention Basins Based on Dual Minimum Accumulation Resistance Model: A Case Study of Xun County in Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Ristić, Dušan & Vukoičić, Danijela & Milinčić, Miroljub, 2019. "Tourism and sustainable development of rural settlements in protected areas - Example NP Кopaonik (Serbia)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Juan Manuel Aristizábal & Gustavo A. García, 2021. "Regional economic growth and convergence: The role of institutions and spillover effects in Colombia," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 1146-1161, August.
    8. Hongwei Zhang & Zhanqi Wang & Ji Chai, 2024. "Understanding government support for rural development in Hubei Province, China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Hong, Huikun & Cai, Zhicong & Liao, Heping & Liu, Ting, 2024. "Rural housing-jobs synergy at the county level in mountainous and hilly areas of China: Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    11. Bianca Mitrică & Paul Şerban & Irena Mocanu & Ines Grigorescu & Nicoleta Damian & Monica Dumitraşcu, 2020. "Social Development and Regional Disparities in the Rural Areas of Romania: Focus on the Social Disadvantaged Areas," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 67-89, November.
    12. Ping Zhang & Weiwei Li & Kaixu Zhao & Yi Zhao & Hua Chen & Sidong Zhao, 2023. "The Impact Factors and Management Policy of Digital Village Development: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, March.
    13. Jan Ženka & Marcela Chreneková & Lucie Kokešová & Veronika Svetlíková, 2021. "Industrial Structure and Economic Resilience of Non-Metropolitan Regions: An Empirical Base for the Smart Specialization Policies," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Perry Ferrell, 2019. "Titles for me but not for thee: transitional gains trap of property rights extension in Colombia," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 95-114, January.
    15. Viccaro, Mauro & Romano, Severino & Prete, Carmelina & Cozzi, Mario, 2021. "Rural planning? An integrated dynamic model for assessing quality of life at a local scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Jianwu Qi & Wei Li & Zongxiang Wang & Haozhou Fang, 2021. "Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    17. Whelan, Adele & McGuinness, Seamus & Barrett, Alan, 2021. "Review of International Approaches to Evaluating Rural and Community Development Investment and Supports," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS124.
    18. Iwona Bąk & Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechuła, 2024. "Urban Development and Sustainable Energy in EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.
    19. Lillemets, Jüri & Fertő, Imre & Viira, Ants-Hannes, 2022. "The socioeconomic impacts of the CAP: Systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Xiaodong Qu & Yuxi Zhang & Zhenming Li, 2024. "Is China’s Rural Revitalization Good Enough? Evidence from Spatial Agglomeration and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-31, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:revi24:340845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.