IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i11p4574-d1403737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is China’s Rural Revitalization Good Enough? Evidence from Spatial Agglomeration and Cluster Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Qu

    (Faculty of Finance, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macao, China)

  • Yuxi Zhang

    (Faculty of Finance, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macao, China)

  • Zhenming Li

    (Faculty of Finance, City University of Macau, Taipa, Macao, China)

Abstract

Rural revitalization is an indispensable part of sustainable economic development in China. This paper proposes a new index to capture and assess rural revitalization (RR) in terms of five dimensions, namely, thriving businesses, pleasant living environments, social etiquette and civility, effective governance, and prosperity. Using spatial and cluster analyses on annual data of 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities of China from 2010 to 2020, we find that: (1) China’s RR is growing year by year during the sample period, yet the overall level of RR is still low, with a national average of merely 0.47 in 2020, and that of the top province Jiangsu only 0.64; (2) The spatial distribution of RR in eastern provinces show high and high (HH) agglomeration, while that in northeastern and western provinces exhibit low and low (LL) agglomeration; and (3) The development level of RR is highly heterogeneous, suggesting that development disparities exist, and deserve the government’s attention. The study suggests some strategies for improving RR in China. In particular, the study sheds light on how to promote RR effectively for local governments to achieve sustainable economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Qu & Yuxi Zhang & Zhenming Li, 2024. "Is China’s Rural Revitalization Good Enough? Evidence from Spatial Agglomeration and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-31, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4574-:d:1403737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4574/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/11/4574/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin Zhu & Xuehui Mei & Zhengqing Xiao, 2023. "The Digital Economy Promotes Rural Revitalization: An Empirical Analysis of Xinjiang in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Stefan KIRCHWEGER & Jochen KANTELHARDT & Friedrich LEISCH, 2015. "Impacts of the government-supported investments on the economic farm performance in Austria," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(8), pages 343-355.
    3. Brian C. Briggeman & Allan W. Gray & Mitchell J. Morehart & Timothy G. Baker & Christine A. Wilson, 2007. "A New U.S. Farm Household Typology: Implications for Agricultural Policy," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 765-782.
    4. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Tao Cen & Shuping Lin & Qiaoyun Wu, 2022. "How Does Digital Economy Affect Rural Revitalization? The Mediating Effect of Industrial Upgrading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Zijie Zhou & Xin Zheng, 2022. "A Cultural Route Perspective on Rural Revitalization of Traditional Villages: A Case Study from Chishui, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. I. Abreu & J. M. Nunes & F. J. Mesias, 2019. "Can Rural Development Be Measured? Design and Application of a Synthetic Index to Portuguese Municipalities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 1107-1123, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Jinyu Fan & Bohong Zheng & Boyang Zhang & Zongsheng Huang & Junyou Liu, 2023. "Research on the Revitalization Path of Ethnic Villages Based on the Inheritance of Spatial Cultural Genes—Taking Tujia Village of Feng Xiang Xi in Guizhou Province as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Ying Wang & Daoliang Ye, 2024. "Enhancing Rural Revitalization in China through Digital Economic Transformation and Green Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Jinqian Deng & Huiling Chi & Tiantian Zhang, 2024. "Effects of Entrepreneurial Activities on Rural Revitalization: Based on Dissipative Structure Theory," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Eleni Oikonomopoulou & Ekaterini T. Delegou & John Sayas & Anastasia Vythoulka & Antonia Moropoulou, 2023. "Preservation of Cultural Landscape as a Tool for the Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: The Case of Mani Peninsula in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-39, August.
    6. Jiajun He & Xin Fan & Lin Chen & Zirui Huang & Yiming Zhao & Chenzhi Zhang, 2023. "Improving the Livelihood Resilience of Poverty-Stricken Population under Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Chongqing M Reservoir Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Viccaro, Mauro & Romano, Severino & Prete, Carmelina & Cozzi, Mario, 2021. "Rural planning? An integrated dynamic model for assessing quality of life at a local scale," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Whelan, Adele & McGuinness, Seamus & Barrett, Alan, 2021. "Review of International Approaches to Evaluating Rural and Community Development Investment and Supports," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS124.
    9. Canjiang Zhu & Weiyi Luo, 2024. "An Empirical Study on the Coupling Coordination and Driving Factors of Rural Revitalization and Rural E-Commerce in the Context of the Digital Economy: The Case of Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Joseph G. Walters & Stuart Marsh & Lucelia Rodrigues, 2022. "Planning Perspectives on Rural Connected, Autonomous and Electric Vehicle Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Heping Ge & Lianzhen Tang & Xiaojun Zhou & Decai Tang & Valentina Boamah, 2022. "Research on the Effect of Rural Inclusive Financial Ecological Environment on Rural Household Income in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Saige Wang & Chenchen Zhai & Yunxiao Zhang, 2024. "Evaluating the Impact of Urban Digital Infrastructure on Land Use Efficiency Based on 279 Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Philip Kostov & Sophia Davidova, 2023. "Smallholders Are Not the Same: Under the Hood of Kosovo Agriculture," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. James, Harvey S., Jr. & Hendrickson, Mary K., 2009. "Are Farmers of the Middle Distinctively “Good Stewards?” Evidence from the Missouri Farm Poll, 2006," Working Papers 92623, University of Missouri Columbia, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    15. Hong, Huikun & Cai, Zhicong & Liao, Heping & Liu, Ting, 2024. "Rural housing-jobs synergy at the county level in mountainous and hilly areas of China: Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Huber, Robert & Bartkowski, Bartosz & Brown, Calum & El Benni, Nadja & Feil, Jan-Henning & Grohmann, Pascal & Joormann, Ineke & Leonhardt, Heidi & Mitter, Hermine & Müller, Birgit, 2024. "Farm typologies for understanding farm systems and improving agricultural policy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    18. Beytollah Mahmoudi & Eric Zenner & Davood Mafi-Gholami & Fatemeh Eshaghi, 2023. "Livelihood Analysis and a New Inferential Model for Development of Forest-Dependent Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    19. Hennebry Barraí & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Classification of Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Application of a Rural Development Index for Austria and Portugal," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 5-14, June.
    20. Joohun Han & Chanjin Chung, 2021. "Impact of Aging and Underemployment on Income Disparity between Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:11:p:4574-:d:1403737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.