IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/remaae/12424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Research Management and the Ex Ante Evaluation of Research Proposals : A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Greig, I.D.

Abstract

A review of the ex ante evaluation of research proposals is structured in the wider context of research management. Five functions of research management are identified; initiation, evaluation, selection, implementation and control, and dissemination. After considering the relative weights given to these functions In the. literature, it is concluded that the past emphasis on selection should, for agricultural research, give way to more on evaluation. A review of the literature indicates that ex ante evaluation of research is feasible, whether using simple expected value or more costly and complex probabilistic models. The cost of evaluation should be balanced against investment in both the other research functions and the proposals themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Greig, I.D., 1981. "Agricultural Research Management and the Ex Ante Evaluation of Research Proposals : A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(02), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12424
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.12424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/12424/files/49020073.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.12424?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Duncan & C. Tisdell, 1971. "Research and Technical Progress: The Returns to Producers," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 47(1), pages 124-129, March.
    2. John R. Moore, Jr. & Norman R. Baker, 1969. "Computational Analysis of Scoring Models for R and D Project Selection," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 212-232, December.
    3. repec:bla:ecorec:v:47:y:1971:i:117:p:124-29 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Conner, J. Richardson & McKee, Vernon C., 1974. "Florida'S System For Resource Allocation In Agricultural Research," 1974 Annual Meeting, August 18-21, College Station, Texas 284533, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. C. R. Shumway & R. J. McCracken, 1975. "Use of Scoring Models in Evaluating Research Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(4), pages 714-718.
    6. Anderson, Jock R., 1972. "An Overview of Modelling in Agricultural Management," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(03), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Willis L. Peterson, 1967. "Discussion: The PPB Approach to Research Evaluation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 49(5), pages 1434-1436.
    8. William E. Souder, 1972. "A Scoring Methodology for Assessing the Suitability of Management Science Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(10), pages 526-543, June.
    9. de Veer, Jan, 1970. "The Economic Evaluation of Research in the Agricultural Sciences and of Extension Work," 1970 Conference, August 23-September 2, 1970, Minsk, U.S.S.R. 209829, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. William J. Abernathy & Richard S. Rosenbloom, 1969. "Parallel Strategies in Development Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(10), pages 486-505, June.
    11. Anderson, Jock R., 1974. "Simulation: Methodology and Application in Agricultural Economics," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(01), pages 1-53, March.
    12. Samuel H. Logan, 1964. "Evaluating Financial Support of Research Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 188-199.
    13. A. G. Lockett & A. E. Gear, 1973. "Representation and Analysis of Multi-Stage Problems in R & D," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(8), pages 947-960, April.
    14. C. Richard Shumway, 1973. "Allocation of Scarce Resources to Agricultural Research: Review of Methodology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(4_Part_1), pages 557-566.
    15. Robert L. Winkler, 1968. "The Consensus of Subjective Probability Distributions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 61-75, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryan, James G., 1984. "Efficiency And Equity Considerations In The Design Of Agricultural Technology In Developing Countries," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 28(2-3), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Collins, D. & Poulter, David, 1990. "Estimation of Welfare Gains from the Parasite Control Program 'Wormkill'," 1990 Conference (34th), February 13-15, 1990, Brisbane, Australia 144925, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scobie, Grant M., 1984. "Investment in Agricultural Research: Some Economic Principles," Economics Working Papers 232447, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    2. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Easter, K. William & Norton, George W., 1976. "Estimates Of Potential Returns From Added Research Budget For The Land Grant Universities," Staff Papers 13464, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Malcolm, Bill, 1990. "Fifty Years of Farm Management in Australia: Survey and Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(01), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Sellen, Daniel & Goddard, Ellen W., 1997. "Research And Advertising Decisions In An Open Economy: The Case Of Colombian Milds Coffee," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Jock R. Anderson, 1982. "Agricultural Economics, Interdependence And Uncertainty," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(2), pages 89-97, August.
    7. B. De Reyck & Y. Grushka-Cockayne & R. Leus, 2007. "A New Challenge in Project Scheduling. The Incorporation of Activity Failures," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 410-435.
    8. Tisdell, Clem, 2014. "Information Technology's Impacts on Productivity, Welfare and Social Change: Second Version," Economic Theory, Applications and Issues Working Papers 195701, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    9. Alston, Julian M. & Freebairn, John W. & James, Jennifer S., 2004. "Levy-funded research choices by producers and society," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-32.
    10. Edwards, Geoff W. & Freebairn, John W., 1982. "The Social Benefits from an Increase in Productivity in a Part of an Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-18, August.
    11. Hall, Nigel H. & Menz, Kenneth M., 1985. "Product Supply Elasticities for the Australian Broadacre Industries, Estimated with a Programming Model," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(01), pages 1-8, April.
    12. Salayo, Nerissa D., 2000. "Investment Opportunities for the Shrimp Processing Industry in the Philippines: Results from a Hedonic Analysis," Discussion Papers DP 2000-12, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    13. Held, Larry J. & Helmers, Glenn A., 1981. "Growth And Survival In Wheat Farming: The Impact Of Land Expansion And Borrowing Restraints," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10, December.
    14. Jarrett, Frank G. & Lindner, Robert K., 1977. "Research Benefits Revisited," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Borrell, Brent & Jiang, Tingsong & Pearce, David & Gould, Ian, 2014. "Payoffs from research and development along the Australian food value chain: a general equilibrium analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(3), July.
    16. Joseph Kadane & Javier Girón & Daniel Peña & Peter Fishburn & Simon French & D. Lindley & Giovanni Parmigiani & Robert Winkler, 1993. "Several Bayesians: A review," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 2(1), pages 1-32, December.
    17. Ming Ding & Jehoshua Eliashberg, 2002. "Structuring the New Product Development Pipeline," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 343-363, March.
    18. Johnson, A. K. L. & Cramb, R. A., 1996. "Integrated land evaluation to generate risk-efficient land-use options in a coastal catchment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 287-305.
    19. Lee, Hsing-fen & Miozzo, Marcela & Laredo, Philippe, 2010. "Career patterns and competences of PhDs in science and engineering in the knowledge economy: The case of graduates from a UK research-based university," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 869-881, September.
    20. Yang, Dazhi & van der Meer, Dennis, 2021. "Post-processing in solar forecasting: Ten overarching thinking tools," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:remaae:12424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.