IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/348679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elektroniczny Obrót Dowodami Składowymi na Swiatowych Giełdach Rolnych. Wnioski Dla Polski

Author

Listed:
  • Wojtowicz, Jarosław

Abstract

Celem badań była ocena wykorzystania elektronicznego dowodu składowego (EWR), jako instrumentu wspierania obrotu surowcami rolnymi na światowych rynkach rolnych oraz analiza możliwości i potencjału wprowadzenia tego systemu w Polsce. Podjęto także próbę zainicjowania dyskusji na temat przywrócenia systemu licencjonowanego magazynowania i EWR. Za materiał źródłowy posłużyły dane statystyczne publikowane przez Futures Industry Association i dane uzyskane z giełd towarowych oraz dostępna literatura przedmiotu. Z analiz wynika, że prawidłowo wdrożony system EWR stanowi sprawdzone w praktyce rozwiązanie problemów występujących w gospodarce żywnościowej, tj.: finansowania bieżących kosztów operacyjnych prowadzenia gospodarstwa rolnego i płynności gospodarstw oraz finansowania obrotu pomiędzy uczestnikami łańcucha dostaw. Aby system EWR odniósł sukces, konieczne jest zrozumienie łańcucha wartości, rynku i środowiska biznesowego, a także konieczna jest ocena ryzyka, konkurencyjności, relacji i procesów oraz potrzeb finansowania łańcucha przez uczestników. Dzięki takiemu podejściu dowód składowy, podążając za towarem, może stanowić zabezpieczenie kredytu dla wszystkich uczestników łańcucha wartości. Dematerializacja dowodu składowego umożliwia przejęcie obrotu tym dokumentem przez licencjonowaną giełdę, a tym samym umożliwia nie tylko obrót instrumentem terminowym, jak np. na giełdach CBOT i MATIF, ale i instrumentem kasowym z dostawą rzeczywistą, jak to jest na giełdach TMEX i e-NAM. W Polsce zlikwidowano system obrotu dowodem składowym, natomiast problemy, które rozwiązywał pozostały. Dlatego, uwzględniając zalety systemu, należy go przywrócić, aby sektor rolny dostał skuteczne i sprawdzone w praktyce rozwiązania.

Suggested Citation

  • Wojtowicz, Jarosław, 2024. "Elektroniczny Obrót Dowodami Składowymi na Swiatowych Giełdach Rolnych. Wnioski Dla Polski," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2024(4).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:348679
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348679/files/15%20%281%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348679?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De,Rahul, 2024. "A History of Economic Policy in India," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009362672, November.
    2. ., 2024. "Context, and an historical trace," Chapters, in: Public Sector Technology Transfer, chapter 3, pages 42-60, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. De,Rahul, 2024. "A History of Economic Policy in India," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009362689, November.
    4. Yuqin Sun & Xu Chang, 2024. "A General History of China's Foreign Trade:Volume 1," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 12838, September.
    5. Oliver E. Williamson, 2000. "The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 595-613, September.
    6. ., 2024. "A brief history of supply chain management," Chapters, in: Concise Introduction to Global Supply Chain Management, chapter 2, pages 9-20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Ineke Maas & Marco H.D. van Leeuwen, 2024. "Intergenerational mobility from a historical perspective," Chapters, in: Elina Kilpi-Jakonen & Jo Blanden & Jani Erola & Lindsey Macmillan (ed.), Research Handbook on Intergenerational Inequality, chapter 16, pages 206-220, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. ., 2024. "The history of economic thought," Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and the Market Economy, chapter 11, pages 248-272, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. ., 2024. "Comparing legal histories," Chapters, in: Comparative Law, chapter 9, pages 183-205, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Citera, Emanuele & Sau, Lino, 2019. "Complexity, Conventions and Instability: the role of monetary policy," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201924, University of Turin.
    2. Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah & Kobus Muller & Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh, 2018. "‘Complex crisis’ and the rise of collaborative natural resource governance: institutional trajectory of a wildlife governance experience in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(5), pages 2205-2224, October.
    3. Eicher, Theo S. & Schreiber, Till, 2010. "Structural policies and growth: Time series evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 169-179, January.
    4. Engelhardt, Sebastian v. & Freytag, Andreas, 2013. "Institutions, culture, and open source," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 90-110.
    5. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.
    6. Elisa D?Adamo, 2018. "La Cost-Benefit Analysis delle grandi infrastrutture: un riesame del Large Hadron Collider (LHC) del CERN," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(1-2), pages 97-108.
    7. Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta, 2010. "Editors’ Introduction," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Osei-Tutu, Francis & Weill, Laurent, 2023. "Individualism reduces borrower discouragement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 370-385.
    9. Nastasi, Federico & Spagano, Salvatore, 2023. "Institutionalist Clues in Celso Furtado’s Economic Thought," MPRA Paper 120242, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Evans, Lewis & Meade, Richard, 2005. "The Role and Significance of Cooperatives in New Zealand Agriculture, A Comparative Institutional Analysis," Working Paper Series 3847, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    11. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2021. "On the optimality of outsourcing when vertical integration can mitigate information asymmetries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    12. Roberto Foa & Anna Nemirovskaya & Elena Mostovova, 2013. "Internal Empires I: Social Institutions of the Frontier," HSE Working papers WP BRP 09/SOC/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    14. Luigi Guiso & Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2016. "Long-Term Persistence," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 14(6), pages 1401-1436, December.
    15. Theo S. Eicher & Andreas Leukert, 2009. "Institutions and Economic Performance: Endogeneity and Parameter Heterogeneity," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(1), pages 197-219, February.
    16. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    17. Catherine Locatelli & Sylvain Rossiaud, 2011. "A neoinstitutionalist interpretation of the changes in the Russian oil model," Post-Print halshs-00631115, HAL.
    18. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2015. "Will the institution of coexistence be re-defined by TTIP?," GMCC-15: Seventh GMCC, November 17-20, 2015, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 211478, International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC).
    19. Abderraouf Ben Ahmed Mtiraoui, 2015. "Governance, Human Capital and Economic Growth in OECD countries: Applying the dynamic panel data (GMM)," Working Papers hal-02528386, HAL.
    20. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:348679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.