IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/paaero/308243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Of Deep Fertilizer Placement In Maize In Terms Of Sustainable Development Criteria

Author

Listed:
  • KRÓL-BADZIAK, ALEKSANDRA
  • KOZYRA, JERZY
  • MATYKA, MARIUSZ

Abstract

Ensuring sustainable agricultural production technologies is becoming increasingly important in the face of the observed climate change and need to reduce the harmful environmental impact of agriculture. The aim of the study is a comparative assessment of the deep fertilizer placement method with surface broadcast application of fertilizers as regards overall sustainability. To reach this goal, based on the results of field experiments and expert opinions, the values of sustainability indicators (economic, environmental and social aspects) were determined. The AHP (analytical hierarchy process) method was applied to comparative assessment. The conducted analysis showed that economic, environmental and overall sustainability assessment are conditioned by productivity achieved. In the first year of the experiment, when the yield increase was not achieved, in terms of sustainability criteria considered, the surface broadcast application of fertilizers was determined to be preferred as compared to the deep fertilizer placement method. On the other hand, in the second year of research with yield increase, the practice with the deep application of mineral fertilizers resulted in a better performance than surface broadcast fertilization, while showing a similar overall performance in the case of natural fertilizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Król-Badziak, Aleksandra & Kozyra, Jerzy & Matyka, Mariusz, 2020. "Efficiency Of Deep Fertilizer Placement In Maize In Terms Of Sustainable Development Criteria," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:308243
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308243/files/1497253.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1994. "How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 19-43, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haluk Gerçek & Birsen Karpak & Tülay Kılınçaslan, 2004. "A multiple criteria approach for the evaluation of the rail transit networks in Istanbul," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 203-228, May.
    2. Eunji Kim & Yoonhee Ha, 2021. "Vitalization Strategies for the Building Energy Management System (BEMS) Industry Ecosystem Based on AHP Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Han, Shengfei & Wang, Wei, 2014. "WTO accession, impediments to FDI, and the market opening of basic telecom services in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 68-81.
    4. Eliaza Mkuna & Lloyd Baiyegunhi & Wiktor Adamus, 2020. "Sustainable livelihood alternatives among Nile perch (Lates niloticus) fishers in Lake Victoria Tanzania: analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Jana Stofkova & Matej Krejnus & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Vladimira Binasova, 2022. "Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Ocampo, Lanndon & Alinsub, Jovir & Casul, Ruselle Anne & Enquig, Germellie & Luar, Mitzi & Panuncillon, Noche & Bongo, Miriam & Ocampo, Christine Omela, 2019. "Public service quality evaluation with SERVQUAL and AHP-TOPSIS: A case of Philippine government agencies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Shuren Wang & Qingyu Chai & Xu Sun & Qiwen Zhang & Hongxian Yu, 2021. "Construction and application of evaluation system for integrated development of agricultural industry in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7469-7479, May.
    8. Prin Boonkanit & Kridchai Suthiluck, 2023. "Developing a Decision-Making Support System for a Smart Construction and Demolition Waste Transition to a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-27, June.
    9. Kulisic, Biljana & Dimitriou, Ioannis & Mola-Yudego, Blas, 2021. "From preferences to concerted policy on mandated share for renewable energy in transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Lucille Alonso & Florent Renard, 2020. "A Comparative Study of the Physiological and Socio-Economic Vulnerabilities to Heat Waves of the Population of the Metropolis of Lyon (France) in a Climate Change Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Sahar Validi & Arijit Bhattacharya & P. J. Byrne, 2021. "An evaluation of three DoE-guided meta-heuristic-based solution methods for a three-echelon sustainable distribution network," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 421-469, January.
    12. Danish Farooq & Sarbast Moslem & Szabolcs Duleba, 2019. "Evaluation of Driver Behavior Criteria for Evolution of Sustainable Traffic Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Aditi Dwivedi & Namkyu Park, 2013. "An Integrated Optimization Model for Distribution Center Location With Considerations of Population and Income," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    14. Blanco, G. & Amarilla, R. & Martinez, A. & Llamosas, C. & Oxilia, V., 2017. "Energy transitions and emerging economies: A multi-criteria analysis of policy options for hydropower surplus utilization in Paraguay," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 312-321.
    15. Masako Numata & Masahiro Sugiyama & Gento Mogi, 2020. "Barrier Analysis for the Deployment of Renewable-Based Mini-Grids in Myanmar Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Alessio Ishizaka & Enrique Mu, 2023. "What is so special about the analytic hierarchy and network process?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 625-634, July.
    17. Sadeghi, Mehdi & Ameli, Ahmad, 2012. "An AHP decision making model for optimal allocation of energy subsidy among socio-economic subsectors in Iran," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 24-32.
    18. Naief A. Aldossary & Jamal K. Alghamdi & Abdulaziz A. Alzahrani & Ali Alqahtany & Saleh H. Alyami, 2023. "Evaluation of Planned Sustainable Urban Development Projects in Al-Baha Region Using Analytical Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Susana Martín-Fernández & Adrián Gómez-Serrano & Eugenio Martínez-Falero & Cristina Pascual, 2018. "Comparison of AHP and a Utility-Based Theory Method for Selected Vertical and Horizontal Forest Structure Indicators in the Sustainability Assessment of Forest Management in the Sierra de Guadarrama N," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    20. James G. Dolan & Emily Boohaker & Jeroan Allison & Thomas F. Imperiale, 2013. "Patients’ Preferences and Priorities Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 59-70, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:paaero:308243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seriaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.