IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/naprej/343318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Land Administration on allocative efficiency of Rice Farmers Under Public and Private Authorities in Dadinkowa Irrigation Area in North-Eastern Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Ayoola, J. B .
  • Mohamadou, S.
  • Abu, G. A.
  • Umeh, J. C .
  • Asogwa, B. C .
  • Ayoola, G. B.
  • Sani, R. M.

Abstract

The study analyzed the effects of land administration on allocative efficiency of rice farmers in Dadinkowa Irrigation Scheme (DKIS) area of Gombe and Borno States, Nigeria. Multi-stage sampling technique was used to select 400 rice farmers under irrigation farming. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze data. Specifically, descriptive statistics was used to identify the types of land administration processes and land exchange approaches, and evaluate the performance of land administration in the study area. Stochastic frontier model was used to estimate the allocative efficiency of rice farmers. Tobit regression analysis was used to assess the effects of land administration, land exchange and other factors on allocative efficiency of rice farmers in the study area. The result showed that, despite the fact that all lands belong to the government, land transactions were carried out informally under customary laws with poor or lack of documentation. The result also revealed that land administration was efficient (67%) in the study area and especially in DKIS (0.74).The study also found that farmers were allocatively efficient given the current level of technology, and efficiency could be increased if the available resources are efficiently used. From the result, farmers under the administration of Integrated Savanna Vegetables and Fruits Canning Factory (VEGFRU) and local authority are more allocatively efficient than those under the administration of DKIS and National Institute of Horticultural Research and Training (NIHORT) and College of Horticulture (CoH) (NIHORT/CoH). Improvement in land administration service deters farmers from efficiently allocating resources for production. Similarly, an increase in hired labour decreases the allocative efficiency of farmers. It was recommended that land administration system should clearly state rights related to the use of government lands and allow land transactions such as the sale of rights of occupancy, the transfer of leasehold rights or rent among farmers so as to strengthen the land markets and improve the efficient use of land. Government should also facilitate the process of obtaining property rights on local lands so as to eliminate the anxiety and uncertainty of expropriation that discourage farmers to make long term investment decision on land and or to use land as collateral for credit.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayoola, J. B . & Mohamadou, S. & Abu, G. A. & Umeh, J. C . & Asogwa, B. C . & Ayoola, G. B. & Sani, R. M., 2022. "Effect of Land Administration on allocative efficiency of Rice Farmers Under Public and Private Authorities in Dadinkowa Irrigation Area in North-Eastern Nigeria," Nigerian Agricultural Policy Research Journal (NAPReJ), Agricultural Policy Research Network (APRNet), vol. 9(1), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:naprej:343318
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343318/files/Ayoola%20et%20al.%2C%20Effect%20of%20Land%20Administration%20on%20allocative%20efficiency%20of%20Rice%20Farmers%20Under%20Public%20and%20Private.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343318?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feder, Gershon & Noronha, Raymond, 1987. "Land Rights Systems and Agricultural Development in Sub-Saharan Afric a," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 2(2), pages 143-169, July.
    2. Monica Lengoiboni & Christine Richter & Paul van Asperen & Jaap Zevenbergen, 2021. "Initial Insights on Land Adjudication in a Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mackinnon, John & Reinikka, Ritva, 2000. "Lessons from Uganda on strategies to fight poverty," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2440, The World Bank.
    2. Cuffaro, Nadia, 1997. "Population growth and agriculture in poor countries: A review of theoretical issues and empirical evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 1151-1163, July.
    3. Jean-Philippe Colin & Mourad Ayouz, 2006. "The Development of a Land Market? Insights from Côte d’Ivoire," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 82(3), pages 404-423.
    4. Barbier,Edward B., 2007. "Natural Resources and Economic Development," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521706513.
    5. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    6. Emran, M. Shahe & Shilpi, Forhad, 2015. "Do Land Market Restrictions Hinder Structural Change in a Rural Economy? Evidence from Sri Lanka," MPRA Paper 66017, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Gwendoline Promsopha, 2016. "Temporary transfers of land and risk-coping mechanisms in Thailand," Working Papers hal-01409110, HAL.
    8. Richens, Peter, 2009. "The economic legacies of the ‘thin white line’: indirect rule and the comparative development of sub-Saharan Africa," Economic History Working Papers 27879, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    9. Schulze, Eberhard & Tillack, Peter & Dolud, Olena & Bukin, Sergej, 1999. "Eigentumsverhältnisse Landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe Und Unternehmen In Russland Und In Der Ukraine - Befragungsergebnisse Aus Den Regionen Nowosibirsk Und Shitomir," IAMO Discussion Papers 14927, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. Quisumbing, Agnes R. & Payongayong, Ellen & Aidoo, J. B. & Otsuka, Keijiro, 1999. "Women's land rights in the transition to individualized ownership," FCND discussion papers 58, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Ghebru, Hosaena, 2015. "Is There a Merit to the Continuum Tenure Approach? A Case of Demand for Land Rights Formulation in Rural Mozambique," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211683, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Lambrecht, Isabel, 2016. "“As a husband I will love, lead, and provide:†Gendered access to land in Ghana:," IFPRI discussion papers 1514, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Fenske, James, 2014. "Imachi Nkwu: Trade and the Commons," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 39-68, March.
    14. Otsuka, Keijiro & Suyanto, S. & Sonobe, Tetsushi & Tomich, Thomas P., 2001. "Evolution of land tenure institutions and development of agroforestry: evidence from customary land areas of Sumatra," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 85-101, June.
    15. Carter, Michael R., 1991. "Risk, Reciprocity and Conditional Self-Insurance in the Sahel: Measurement and Implications for the Trajectory of Agricultural Development in West Africa," Staff Papers 200542, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    16. Lambert, Sylvie & Ravallion, Martin & van de Walle, Dominique, 2014. "Intergenerational mobility and interpersonal inequality in an African economy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 327-344.
    17. François-Régis Mahieu, 1989. "Principes économiques et sociétés africaines," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 30(120), pages 725-753.
    18. repec:ilo:ilowps:283665 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Mintewab Bezabih & Stein Holden & Andrea Mannberg, 2016. "The Role of Land Certification in Reducing Gaps in Productivity between Male- and Female-Owned Farms in Rural Ethiopia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 360-376, March.
    20. Marc F. Bellemare, 2013. "The Productivity Impacts of Formal and Informal Land Rights: Evidence from Madagascar," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 89(2), pages 272-290.
    21. Akaateba, Millicent Awialie, 2019. "The politics of customary land rights transformation in peri-urban Ghana: Powers of exclusion in the era of land commodification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:naprej:343318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aprneea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.