IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/43217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rice versus Shrimp Production in Thailand: Is There Really a Conflict?

Author

Listed:
  • Mekhora, Thamrong
  • McCann, Laura M.J.

Abstract

Shrimp farming in Thailand has had disastrous effects on the environment in the past, which has prompted a government ban on shrimp production in inland areas. However, a new low-salinity shrimp farming system has developed that seems to have fewer disease and environmental problems than previous systems but competes with rice production for land and water resources. The present study found that shrimp farming exhibits increasing returns to scale and is much more profitable than rice farming, which offers opportunities for rice farmers to improve their incomes through diversification. No evidence was found for external environmental effects of shrimp production on rice production or vice versa. A total ban on shrimp production in rice farming areas does not seem justified, although further analysis on the environmental effects of this farming system is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Mekhora, Thamrong & McCann, Laura M.J., 2003. "Rice versus Shrimp Production in Thailand: Is There Really a Conflict?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:43217
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.43217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/43217/files/Mekhora%20JAAE%20April%202003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.43217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Flaherty, Mark & Vandergeest, Peter & Miller, Paul, 1999. "Rice Paddy or Shrimp Pond: Tough Decisions in Rural Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(12), pages 2045-2060, December.
    2. Otto A. Davis & Andrew Whinston, 1962. "Externalities, Welfare, and the Theory of Games," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70(3), pages 241-241.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, Craig & Forsyth, Timothy, 2002. "In the Eyes of the State: Negotiating a "Rights-Based Approach" to Forest Conservation in Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1591-1605, September.
    2. Vagneron, Isabelle, 2007. "Economic appraisal of profitability and sustainability of peri-urban agriculture in Bangkok," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 516-529, March.
    3. Forsyth, Tim, 2007. "Are Environmental Social Movements Socially Exclusive? An Historical Study from Thailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 2110-2130, December.
    4. John Jackson, 2014. "Location, location, location: the Davis-Hinich model of electoral competition," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 197-218, April.
    5. Chinmay Maheshwari & Kshitij Kulkarni & Manxi Wu & Shankar Sastry, 2022. "Inducing Social Optimality in Games via Adaptive Incentive Design," Papers 2204.05507, arXiv.org.
    6. Weaver, Robert D., 1978. "Discontinuous Policy and Distorted Choices: the Case of Acreage Control," Staff Paper Series 291354, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    7. J. Moreh, 1985. "Utilitarianism and the Conflict of Interests," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 29(1), pages 137-159, March.
    8. Robert D. Tollison & Thomas D. Willett, 1978. "Fiscal Federalism: a Voting System Where Spillovers Taper Off Spatially," Public Finance Review, , vol. 6(3), pages 327-342, July.
    9. Paul L. Joskow & Roger G. Noll, 1981. "Regulation in Theory and Practice: An Overview," NBER Chapters, in: Studies in Public Regulation, pages 1-78, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Green, Jerry & Sheshinski, Eytan, 1976. "Direct versus Indirect Remedies for Externalities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(4), pages 797-808, August.
    11. Mulubrhan Amare & Priyanka Parvathi & Trung Thanh Nguyen, 2023. "Micro insights on the pathways to agricultural transformation: Comparative evidence from Southeast Asia and Sub‐Saharan Africa," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 71(1), pages 69-87, March.
    12. Adam Gifford Jr. & Courtenay C. Stone, 1973. "Externalities, Liability And The Coase Theorem:A Mathematical Analysis," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 11(3), pages 260-269, September.
    13. Morakinyo O. Adetutu & Thomas G. Weyman-Jones, 2019. "Fuel Subsidies Versus Market Power: Is There a Countervailing Second-Best Optimum?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(4), pages 1619-1646, December.
    14. Yanjiang Zhang & Hongyi Fan & Qingling Liu & Xiaofen Yu & Shangming Yang, 2023. "How a Short-Lived Rumor of Residential Redevelopment Disturbs a Local Housing Market: Evidence from Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Langham, Max R., 1971. "A Theoretical Framework For Viewing Pollution Problems," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.
    17. Molle, F., 2003. "Reform of the Thai irrigation sector: is there scope for increasing water productivity," IWMI Books, Reports H032647, International Water Management Institute.
    18. John A. Sorrentino, Jr. & Andrew B. Whinston, 1975. "Private Resolution of Production Externalities," Eastern Economic Journal, Eastern Economic Association, vol. 2(2), pages 131-142, April.
    19. Poulomi Bhattacharya & K. N. Ninan, 2011. "Social cost‐benefit analysis of intensive versus traditional shrimp farming: A case study from India," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(4), pages 321-333, November.
    20. Gowing, J. W. & Tuong, T. P. & Hoanh, Chu Thai & Khiem, Nguyen Tri, 2006. "Social and environmental impact of rapid change in the coastal zone of Vietnam: an assessment of sustainability issues," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:43217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.