IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/15404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Agribusiness Operation Realignment In The Texas Prison System

Author

Listed:
  • McCarl, Bruce A.
  • Rister, M. Edward
  • Ward, Ruby A.
  • Long, Charles R.
  • McCorkle, Dean A.
  • Ziari, Houshmand A.
  • Conner, J. Richard
  • Sturdivant, Allen W.
  • Thompson, Troy N.

Abstract

Mathematical programming-based systems analysis is used to examine the consequences of alternative operation configuration for the agricultural operations within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Continuation versus elimination of the total operation as well as individual operating departments are considered. Methodology includes a firm systems operation model combined with capital budgeting and an integer programming based investment model. Results indicate the resources realize a positive return as a whole, but some enterprises are not using resources profitably. The integer investment model is found to be superior for investigating whether to continue multiple interrelated enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • McCarl, Bruce A. & Rister, M. Edward & Ward, Ruby A. & Long, Charles R. & McCorkle, Dean A. & Ziari, Houshmand A. & Conner, J. Richard & Sturdivant, Allen W. & Thompson, Troy N., 2000. "Strategic Agribusiness Operation Realignment In The Texas Prison System," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15404
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15404/files/32010145.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Martin Weingartner, 1966. "Capital Budgeting of Interrelated Projects: Survey and Synthesis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(7), pages 485-516, March.
    2. Stephen W. Fuller & Paul Randolph & Darwin Klingman, 1976. "Optimizing Subindustry Marketing Organizations: A Network Analysis Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 58(3), pages 425-436.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobin, Roger L., 1999. "A fast interactive solution method for large capital expenditure selection problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Gupta, Renu & Bandopadhyaya, Lakshmisree & Puri, M. C., 1996. "Ranking in quadratic integer programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 231-236, November.
    3. Christian Meier & Dennis Kundisch & Jochen Willeke, 2017. "Is it Worth the Effort?," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(2), pages 81-95, April.
    4. Keniston, Maura & Pratt, James E. & Stephenson, Mark W. & Novakovic, Andrew M., 1992. "Disaster Planning in the Dairy Industry: Conceptual Issues and a Spatial Modelling Approach," Staff Papers 121540, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & Asadi, Mohsen, 2015. "Prioritizing road extension projects with interdependent benefits under time constraint," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 196-216.
    6. Mikhail Timonin, 2012. "Maximization of the Choquet integral over a convex set and its application to resource allocation problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 543-579, July.
    7. Enrique Garza-Escalante & Arturo de la Torre, 2015. "Nacional Monte de Piedad Uses a Novel Social-Value Measure for Allocating Grants Among Charities," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 514-528, December.
    8. Pérez, Fátima & Gómez, Trinidad & Caballero, Rafael & Liern, Vicente, 2018. "Project portfolio selection and planning with fuzzy constraints," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 117-129.
    9. Debarun Bhattacharjya & Jo Eidsvik & Tapan Mukerji, 2013. "The Value of Information in Portfolio Problems with Dependent Projects," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 341-351, December.
    10. Koo, Won W. & Marshall, Douglas D., 1985. "Optimal Grain Distribution System and Subterminal Capacity in North Dakota," Agricultural Economics Reports 23422, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    11. S. D. Deshmukh & S.D.Chikte, 1974. "On the R & D Process and Decisions," Discussion Papers 102, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    12. Ye Tian & Miao Sun & Zuoliang Ye & Wei Yang, 2016. "Expanded models of the project portfolio selection problem with loss in divisibility," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(8), pages 1097-1107, August.
    13. Wilbaut, Christophe & Salhi, Saïd & Hanafi, Saïd, 2009. "An iterative variable-based fixation heuristic for the 0-1 multidimensional knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 339-348, December.
    14. Fuller, Stephen W. & Shanmugham, Chiyyarath V., 1978. "Network Flow Models: Use In Rural Freight Transportation Analysis And A Comparison With Linear Programming," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-6, December.
    15. Sabah Bushaj & İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın, 2024. "A K-means Supported Reinforcement Learning Framework to Multi-dimensional Knapsack," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 89(3), pages 655-685, July.
    16. Crama, Yves, 1997. "Combinatorial optimization models for production scheduling in automated manufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 136-153, May.
    17. Patrizia Beraldi & Maria Bruni & Antonio Violi, 2012. "Capital rationing problems under uncertainty and risk," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1375-1396, April.
    18. Fernández Carazo, Ana & Gómez Núñez, Trinidad & Guerrero Casas, Flor M. & Caballero Fernández, Rafael, 2008. "Evaluación y clasificación de las técnicas utilizadas por las organizaciones, en las últimas décadas, para seleccionar proyectos = Evaluation and classification of the techniques used by organizations," Revista de Métodos Cuantitativos para la Economía y la Empresa = Journal of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Quantitative Methods for Economics and Business Administration, vol. 5(1), pages 67-115, June.
    19. Gerald G. Brown & Robert F. Dell & Alexandra M. Newman, 2004. "Optimizing Military Capital Planning," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 415-425, December.
    20. Christian Meier & Dennis Kundisch & Jochen Willeke, 2015. "Is it Worth the Effort? - A Decision Model to Evaluate Resource Interactions in IS Project Portfolios," Working Papers Dissertations 21, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.