IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/139414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Quality of Pacific Northwest Pears

Author

Listed:
  • Gallardo, Rosa Karina
  • Kupferman, Eugene M.
  • Beaudry, Randolph M.
  • Blankenship, Sylvia M.
  • Mitcham, Elizabeth J.
  • Watkins, Christopher B.

Abstract

This study uses data collected from retail grocery chains during marketing season 2003-2004 to examine the external quality and price variations of Pacific Northwest pears. Quality refers to overall fruit appearance and presence of external disorders. Results from a bivariate probit model show that fruit weight and firmness had a positive effect on overall appearance. Results from a hedonic price model show that the recurrence of external disorders is not necessarily negatively correlated with price variations. Overall, this study shows the need to investigate methods of storage, packing, and transportation to achieve the ideal fruit characteristics that appeal to consumers, wholesalers, and retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Gallardo, Rosa Karina & Kupferman, Eugene M. & Beaudry, Randolph M. & Blankenship, Sylvia M. & Mitcham, Elizabeth J. & Watkins, Christopher B., 2011. "Market Quality of Pacific Northwest Pears," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 42(2), pages 1-11, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139414
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.139414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/139414/files/Gallardo_42_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.139414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Durham, Catherine A. & McFetridge, Marc V. & Johnson, Aaron J., 2005. "The Development of a Quality Scale to Measure the Impact of Quality on Supermarket Fruit Demand," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 36(1), pages 1-6, March.
    2. Zhang, Huifang & Gallardo, Rosa Karina & McCluskey, Jill J. & Kupferman, Eugene M., 2010. "Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Treatment-Induced Quality Attributes in Anjou Pears," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 1-13.
    3. Rosen, Sherwin, 1974. "Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(1), pages 34-55, Jan.-Feb..
    4. Combris, Pierre & Pinto, Alexandra Seabra & Fragata, Antonio & Giraud-Heraud, Eric, 2007. "Does taste beat food safety? Evidence from the "Pera Rocha" case in Portugal," 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy 7879, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valenciano, Jaime de Pablo & Manso, José Ramos Pires & Battistuzzi, Miguel Ángel Giacinti, 2017. "Drivers of the International Pear Market: A Panel data Approach," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 1), January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Watson, Jonathan Adam & Wysocki, Allen F. & Gunderson, Michael A. & Brecht, Jeffrey K. & Sims, Charles A., 2012. "Fresh Hammock-Packed Bartlett Pears: Implications For Marketing Based On Consumers’ Willingness To Pay For Sensory Attributes And Return On Invesment Potential," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 125068, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Carrillo-Rodriguez, Lilian & Gallardo, R. Karina & Yue, Chengyan & McCracken, Vicki A. & Luby, James & McFerson, James R., 2013. "Consumer preferences for apple quality traits," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150503, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Gallardo, Rosa Karina, 2011. "Choice Experiments’ Findings: A Tool for Fruit Agribusiness Managers’ Decision Making," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Ritter, Matthias & Hüttel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Seifert, Stefan, 2020. "Revisiting the relationship between land price and parcel size in agriculture," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    5. Fernando Carriazo & Julian Peñaranda, 2015. "The Effect of Commuting Costs to Employment Centers on Urban Property Values: A Spatial Analysis in Bogotá, Colombia," Documentos CEDE 13133, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    6. Lucija Muehlenbachs & Elisheba Spiller & Christopher Timmins, 2015. "The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(12), pages 3633-3659, December.
    7. Daniel Hassan & Sylvette Monier-Dilhan, 2003. "Transmission des prix dans la filière fruits: une approche hédonique," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 275(1), pages 19-29.
    8. Maristella Botticini & Aloysius Siow, 2003. "Why Dowries?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1385-1398, September.
    9. Guilfoos, Todd & Walsh, Jason, 2023. "A hedonic study of New England dam removals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Alexander Kihm & Colin Vance, 2016. "The determinants of equity transmission between the new and used car markets: a hedonic analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(10), pages 1250-1258, October.
    11. Huang, Chung L. & Lin, Biing-Hwan, 2006. "A Hedonic Analysis on the Implicit Values of Fresh Tomatoes," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25404, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Muhammad Rafiq & Mir Kalan Shah, 2010. "The Value of Reduced Risk of Injury and Deaths in Pakistan—Using Actual and Perceived Risk Estimates," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 823-837.
    13. Annie Tubadji & Peter Nijkamp, 2015. "Cultural impact on regional development: application of a PLS-PM model to Greece," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 54(3), pages 687-720, May.
    14. Kim, Dongsoo & Liu, Feng & Yezer, Anthony, 2009. "Do inter-city differences in intra-city wage differentials have any interesting implications?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 203-209, November.
    15. Gautier, Pieter & van Vuuren, Aico & Siegmann, Arjen, 2007. "The Effect of the Theo van Gogh Murder on House Prices in Amsterdam," CEPR Discussion Papers 6175, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Senik, Claudia, 2014. "The French unhappiness puzzle: The cultural dimension of happiness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 379-401.
    17. Anwar Hussain & Ian A. Munn & Jerry Brashier & W. Daryl Jones & James E. Henderson, 2013. "Capitalization of Hunting Lease Income into Northern Mississippi Forestland Values," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 89(1), pages 137-153.
    18. Bond, Craig A. & Thilmany, Dawn D. & Bond, Jennifer Keeling, 2008. "What to Choose? The Value of Label Claims to Fresh Produce Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 1-26.
    19. Greene, David & Hossain, Anushah & Hofmann, Julia & Helfand, Gloria & Beach, Robert, 2018. "Consumer willingness to pay for vehicle attributes: What do we Know?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 258-279.
    20. Paramita Dhar & Stephen L. Ross, 2009. "School Quality and Property Values: Re-examining the Boundary Approach," Working papers 2009-37, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised May 2010.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:139414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.