IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jasfmr/342893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grower Production and Economic Efficiency in the Semi-Arid Southern Great Plains

Author

Listed:
  • Lambert, Lixia H.
  • Shear, Hannah E.
  • Warren, Jason

Abstract

Agricultural production competitions that focus on a single crop, relatively similar field conditions, and similar growing conditions can provide valuable information to extension educators, researchers, and growers on input and resource management. Using data collected from a grower competition in the Oklahoma panhandle, a semi-arid region, we estimated the relative production and economic efficiency scores for competing grower teams. Efficiency was measured using data envelopment analysis (DEA) procedures. Results show that comparatively lower fertilizer application rates and higher rates of irrigation generated the highest efficiency scores. Limited application of fertilizer and irrigation may achieve technical and cost efficiencies, but it is not an optimal decision if the producer’s objective is to maximize profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Lambert, Lixia H. & Shear, Hannah E. & Warren, Jason, 2023. "Grower Production and Economic Efficiency in the Semi-Arid Southern Great Plains," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2023, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jasfmr:342893
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342893/files/Grower%20Production%20and%20Economic%20Efficiency%20in%20the%20Semi-Arid%20Southern%20Great%20Plains.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, September.
    2. Roman M. Sheremeta, 2013. "Overbidding And Heterogeneous Behavior In Contest Experiments," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 491-514, July.
    3. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Aliber, Michael, 1993. "An Analysis Of Economic Efficiency In Agriculture: A Nonparametric Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(01), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean‐Paul Chavas & Doris Läpple & Bradford Barham & Emma Dillon, 2022. "An economic analysis of production efficiency: Evidence from Irish farms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(2), pages 153-173, June.
    2. Joanna Domagała, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Aspects of Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Nicola GALLUZZO, 2016. "An analysis of the efficiency in a sample of small Italian farms part of the FADN dataset," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(2), pages 62-70.
    4. Langemeier, Michael, 2011. "PR - Measuring Scope Efficiency For Crop And Beef Farms (p245-253)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345576, International Farm Management Association.
    5. Weiying Liu & Sriram Shankar & Lihua Li, 2021. "Is specialization a strategy to improve farm efficiency in northwest China?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 1695-1710, August.
    6. Lundgren, Tommy & Marklund, Per-Olov & Zhang, Shanshan, 2016. "Industrial energy demand and energy efficiency – Evidence from Sweden," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 130-152.
    7. Kyung Hwan Baik & Subhasish M. Chowdhury & Abhijit Ramalingam, 2021. "Group size and matching protocol in contests," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 1716-1736, November.
    8. Helmi Hammami & Thanh Ngo & David Tripe & Dinh-Tri Vo, 2022. "Ranking with a Euclidean common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: with application to the Eurozone banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 675-694, April.
    9. Kox, Henk L.M. & Leeuwen, George van & Wiel, Henry van der, 2010. "Competitive, but too small - productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services," MPRA Paper 24389, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Emmanuel Dechenaux & Dan Kovenock & Roman Sheremeta, 2015. "A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(4), pages 609-669, December.
    11. Silvia Saravia-Matus & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Sreejith Aravindakshan & Stefan Sieber & Jimmy A. Saravia & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2021. "Can Enhancing Efficiency Promote the Economic Viability of Smallholder Farmers? A Case of Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Norman Gemmell & Patrick Nolan & Grant Scobie, 2017. "Public sector productivity: Quality adjusting sector-level data on New Zealand schools," Working Papers 2017/02, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    13. Hoffmann, Magnus & Kolmar, Martin, 2017. "Distributional preferences in probabilistic and share contests," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 120-139.
    14. Kangile, Rajabu Joseph, 2015. "Efficiency In Production By Smallholder Rice Farmers Under Cooperative Irrigation Schemes In Pwani And Morogoro Regions, Tanzania," Research Theses 265681, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    15. Veronika Fenyves & Tibor Tarnóczi & Zoltán Bács & Dóra Kerezsi & Péter Bajnai & Mihály Szoboszlai, 2022. "Financial efficiency analysis of Hungarian agriculture, fisheries and forestry sector," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(11), pages 413-426.
    16. Simona Alfiero & Laura Broccardo & Massimo Cane & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "High Performance Through Innovation Process Management in SMEs. Evidence from the Italian wine sector," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 87-110.
    17. Krisada Prachumrasee & Panpun Ronghanam & Kasipat Thonmanee & Pakpoom Phonsungnoen & Pathompohn Mangma & Prasongchai Setthasuravich & Grichawat Lowatcharin, 2024. "From Traditional to Digital: Transforming Local Administrative Organization Workflows in Thailand Through Social Listening Tools," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Helis Luik-Lindsaar & Ants-Hannes Viira & Haldja Viinalass & Tanel Kaart & Rando Värnik, 2018. "How do herd's genetic level and milk quality affect performance of dairy farms?," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(10), pages 379-388.
    19. Fethi, Meryem Duygun & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2010. "Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 189-198, July.
    20. William Griffiths & Xiaohui Zhang & Xueyan Zhao, 2010. "A Stochastic Frontier Model for Discrete Ordinal Outcomes: A Health Production Function," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1092, The University of Melbourne.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jasfmr:342893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asfmrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.