IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inijae/345180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of PMKISAN Scheme on Production and Efficiency of Ragi (Eleusine Coracana) Crop of Tumkur District of Karnataka

Author

Listed:
  • Kavitha, H.N.
  • Kumar, Pramod
  • Anbukkani, P.
  • Burman, R.R.

Abstract

The PMKISAN scheme has been implemented from 1st December 2018 with income support of Rs. 6000/- per farm family in three installments of Rs 2000/- each in the beginning of crop season. The beneficiaries of PMKISAN in Karnataka are using higher inputsfor ragi cultivation. The resultant effect is increase in yield and income. The B:C ratio of ragi enterprise is higher among the beneficiary farmers as compared to non-beneficiary farmers. The presence of money has enabled the farmers to be technically more efficient as compared to non-beneficiary farmers. The beneficiary farmers have realised 9.07 per cent higher gross return as compared to non-beneficiary farmers. The beneficairies have moved up the technical efficiency ladder with greater proportion of farmers being observed with medium and above efficiency as compared to non-beneficiaries. It is therefore suggested that the scheme must be continued in future to boost the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Kavitha, H.N. & Kumar, Pramod & Anbukkani, P. & Burman, R.R., 2021. "Impact of PMKISAN Scheme on Production and Efficiency of Ragi (Eleusine Coracana) Crop of Tumkur District of Karnataka," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:345180
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345180/files/Impact%20of%20PMKISAN%20Scheme%20on%20Production.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Standing Guy, 2008. "How Cash Transfers Promote the Case for Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Bisaliah, S., 1977. "Decomposition Analysis of Output Change Under New Production Technology in Wheat Farming: Some Implications to Returns on Research Investment," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32(3), July.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerstin Pull & Birgit Pferdmenges & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2017. "Do Research Training Groups Operate at Optimal Size?," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 18(2), pages 129-145, May.
    2. Ghiyasi, Mojtaba & Cook, Wade D., 2021. "Modelling the semi-additive production technology in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Arzum Buyukkeklik & Harun Dumlu & Samet Evci, 2016. "Measuring the Efficiency of Turkish SMEs: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(6), pages 190-190, June.
    4. Mohammad Reza TAVAKOLI BAGHDADABAD & Afsaneh NOORI HOUSHYAR, 2014. "Productivity and Efficiency Evaluation of US Mutual Funds," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 64(2), pages 120-143, March.
    5. Paolo Mazzocchi & Claudio Quintano & Antonella Rocca, 2024. "Efficiency analysis using SBM and PLS-SEM: insights from the Italian judicial system," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5621-5654, December.
    6. Ajayi, Victor & Anaya, Karim & Pollitt, Michael, 2022. "Incentive regulation, productivity growth and environmental effects: the case of electricity networks in Great Britain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. François Seck FALL & Harouna WASSONGMA & Waly Clément FAYE, 2019. "Total Factor Productivity Change of Senegalese Microfinance Institutions: A Malmquist Productivity Index Approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(3), pages 1786-1797.
    8. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Kaffash, Sepideh & Zhu, Joe, 2022. "U.S. airline mergers’ performance and productivity change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Nurhan Davutyan & Canan Yildirim, 2013. "Competitiveness in Turkish Banking: 2002-2011," Working Papers 774, Economic Research Forum, revised Sep 2013.
    10. Khanjarpanah, Hossein & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2019. "Sustainable wind plant location optimization using fuzzy cross-efficiency data envelopment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1004-1018.
    11. Premachandra, I.M. & Bhabra, Gurmeet Singh & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "DEA as a tool for bankruptcy assessment: A comparative study with logistic regression technique," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 412-424, March.
    12. repec:zbw:rwirep:0060 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Seufert, Juergen Heinz & Arjomandi, Amir & Dakpo, K. Hervé, 2017. "Evaluating airline operational performance: A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 52-68.
    14. Chun-Chu Liu, 2008. "Evaluating the operational efficiency of major ports in the Asia-Pacific region using data envelopment analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(13), pages 1737-1743.
    15. Agrell, Per J. & Teusch, Jonas, 2020. "Predictability and strategic behavior under frontier regulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Christian Growitsch & Tooraj Jamasb & Christine Müller & Matthias Wissner, 2016. "Social Cost Efficient Service Quality: Integrating Customer Valuation in Incentive Regulation—Evidence from the Case of Norway," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 71-91, Springer.
    17. Xianhua Wu & Yufeng Chen & Ji Guo & Ge Gao, 2018. "Inputs optimization to reduce the undesirable outputs by environmental hazards: a DEA model with data of PM2.5 in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499, January.
    19. Tengfei Wang & Jong Woo Kang & Vincent F. Valentine, 2020. "A holistic analysis of national e-commerce and logistics development," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 500-513, September.
    20. Färe, Rolf & Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2020. "Profit efficiency: Generalization, business accounting and the role of convexity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    21. Alperovych, Yan & Hübner, Georges & Lobet, Fabrice, 2015. "How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 508-525.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:345180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.