IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inijae/206368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Irrigation Difference and Productivity Variations in Paddy Cultivation: Field Evidences from Udalguri District of Assam

Author

Listed:
  • Goyari, Phanindra

Abstract

Using field survey data, the paper examines the seasonal variation of irrigation facilities for cultivation of paddy with special emphasis on summer paddy in Assam. Paddy is cultivated in three seasons - autumn, winter and summer. In terms of acreage and production, winter rice has traditionally been the most dominant. However, the acreage shares of winter and autumn rice in total rice area have been declining continuously over the years. On the contrary, the importance of summer rice has been increasing in terms of acreage share and yield mainly since the last few decades. This trend has opened up a debate whether the summer season, being a flood free season, can be made an important cropping season. Many farmers have adopted the risk aversion strategy of not using costly inputs like fertilisers, pesticides, improved seeds, etc. during kharif season for the fear that excess rainwater and floods would wash away. Field reports show that the availability/arrival of short duration new paddy varieties has enabled the farmers to adjust crop seasons and cultivate paddy in the three seasons of the year. While summer is a new emerging season for paddy cultivation, farmers face problems of scarcity of irrigation water due to scanty rainfall. Only those farmers were found cultivating summer paddy, whose plots had access to naturally flowing water ways and who can afford artificial means of irrigation through borewells and pumpsets. Therefore, the future plans on the development of irrigation potentials should give emphasis on the development of groundwater based on installation of shallow tubewells and borewells, construction of small dams on the naturally flowing water ways, harvesting of rainwater during rainy season and also on controlling of floods for water management.

Suggested Citation

  • Goyari, Phanindra, 2014. "Irrigation Difference and Productivity Variations in Paddy Cultivation: Field Evidences from Udalguri District of Assam," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 69(1), pages 1-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:206368
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.206368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/206368/files/Goyari69_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.206368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Karam, 2011. "Groundwater Depletion in Punjab: Measurement and Countering Strategies," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(4), pages 1-17.
    2. Coupal, Roger H. & Wilson, Paul N., 1990. "Adopting water-conserving irrigation technology: The case of surge irrigation in Arizona," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 15-28, May.
    3. McGuirk, Anya & Mundlak, Yair, 1991. "Incentives and constraints in the transformation of Punjab agriculture," Research reports 87, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaur, Rajbir & Arora, VK, 2019. "Deep tillage and residue mulch effects on productivity and water and nitrogen economy of spring maize in north-west India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 724-731.
    2. Jeff Alwang & Jaime Ortiz & George Norton, 1995. "Interacciones entre Políticas de Precios y Gastos en Investigación Agropecuaria," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 32(96), pages 199-216.
    3. Singh, Nirvikar, 2015. "Punjab’s Agricultural Innovation Challenge," Santa Cruz Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt4716p3vr, Department of Economics, UC Santa Cruz.
    4. Murgai, Rinku, 1999. "The green revolution and the productivity paradox : evidence from the Indian Punjab," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2234, The World Bank.
    5. Sylvain Dessy & Jacques Ewoudou & Isabelle Ouellet, 2006. "Understanding the Persistent Low Performance of African Agriculture," Cahiers de recherche 0622, CIRPEE.
    6. Joshi, K. & Joshi, P.K. & Khan, M.T. & Kishore, A., 2018. "Sticky Rice': Variety Inertia in a Technologically Progressive State of India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277529, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Julieta Caunedo & Elisa Keller, 2021. "Capital Obsolescence and Agricultural Productivity," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(1), pages 505-561.
    8. Kalamkar, S., 2018. "Adoption of Recommended Doses of Fertilisers on Soil Test Basis by Small and Marginal Farmers in Gujarat, India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277333, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Maurice Ogada & Germano Mwabu & Diana Muchai, 2014. "Farm technology adoption in Kenya: a simultaneous estimation of inorganic fertilizer and improved maize variety adoption decisions," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Singh, Karam, 2012. "Electricity Subsidy in Punjab Agriculture: Extent and Impact," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(4), pages 1-16.
    11. Pandey, Lalmani & Rao, P. Parthasarathy & Birthal, P.S. & Bantilan, Cynthia & Binswanger, Hans P., 2012. "Supply Response and Investment in Agriculture in Andhra Pradesh," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Xiaobo Zhang & Timothy Mount & Richard Boisvert, 2004. "Industrialization, urbanization and land use in China," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(3), pages 207-224.
    13. Kanber, Riza & Koksal, Harun & Onder, Sermet & Kapur, Selim & Sahan, Sebahattin, 2001. "Comparison of surge and continuous furrow methods for cotton in the Harran plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 119-135, March.
    14. Santos, Francisco L., 1996. "Evaluation and adoption of irrigation technologies. I. Management-design curves for furrow and level basin systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 52(2-3), pages 317-329.
    15. Goundan, Anatole & Sall, Moussa & Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2020. "Modeling interrelated inputs adoption in rainfed agriculture in Senegal," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2020-05, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    16. Mundlak, Yair, 2003. "Economic Growth: Lessons From Two Centuries Of American Agriculture," Discussion Papers 14986, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    17. Kaur, Rajbir & Arora, VK, 2018. "Assessing spring maize responses to irrigation and nitrogen regimes in north-west India using CERES-Maize model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 171-177.
    18. Goyari, P., 2008. "Scarcity in the midst of plenty: irrigation development for water abundant Assam," Conference Papers h042922, International Water Management Institute.
    19. Huang, Jikun & Rozelle, Scott, 1996. "Technological change: Rediscovering the engine of productivity growth in China's rural economy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 337-369, May.
    20. Kerr, John M., 1996. "Sustainable development of rainfed agriculture in India:," EPTD discussion papers 20, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inijae:206368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.