IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/200240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of a range of options for the management of soiled water/dilute slurry on Irish dairy farms

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan, Willie
  • French, Padraig
  • Minogue, Dennis
  • Ruane, Eimear M.
  • Shalloo, Laurence

Abstract

Dairy soiled water (DSW) is water collected from concreted areas, hard stand areas and holding areas for livestock that has become contaminated by livestock faeces or urine, and parlour washings and must be managed in compliance to the Nitrates Directive S.I.610.2010. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the economic outcomes from a range of options for the management of DSW on Irish grass based dairy production systems. The management options evaluated were DSW stored separately for 10 days, DSW recycled using a woodchip and a sand filter, and DSW mixed together with slurry. The different options investigated centred around contrasting methods of DSW storage and application. The overall mean net costs for storage, treatment and application were €242, €1536 and €849 respectively . The mean savings were €15 per cow across management options, consisting of savings from fertiliser, water, increased herbage DM production. The management option of storing DSW with slurry had higher savings compared to MO1 and MO2, which were attained from extending the grazing season length, using low cost storage and application methods combined with strategic application during the growing season for optimum NFRV and DM response.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan, Willie & French, Padraig & Minogue, Dennis & Ruane, Eimear M. & Shalloo, Laurence, 2014. "Economic evaluation of a range of options for the management of soiled water/dilute slurry on Irish dairy farms," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:200240
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200240/files/107_Ryan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Lips & Peter Rieder, 2005. "Abolition of Raw Milk Quota in the European Union: A CGE Analysis at the Member Country Level," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James D. A. Millington & Hang Xiong & Steve Peterson & Jeremy Woods, 2017. "Integrating Modelling Approaches for Understanding Telecoupling: Global Food Trade and Local Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Matthews, Alan & Salvatici, Luca & Scoppola, Margherita, 2017. "Trade Impacts of Agricultural Support in the EU," Commissioned Papers 252767, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    3. Fabio A. Madau & Roberto Furesi & Pietro Pulina, 2017. "Technical efficiency and total factor productivity changes in European dairy farm sectors," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Lehtonen, Heikki, 2008. "Resolving the conflict between environmental damage and agricultural viability on less favoured areas," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44150, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Ang, Frederic & Oude Lansink, Alfons, 2014. "Dynamic profit inefficiency: a DEA application to Belgian dairy farms," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182649, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Bourne, M. & Philippidis, G. & Quiroga, S. & Fernandez-Haddad, Z., 2013. "Kyoto and Mañana: A CGE analysis of Spanish Greenhouse Gas targets to 2020," Conference papers 332344, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Giuseppe Todde & Lelia Murgia & Maria Caria & Antonio Pazzona, 2018. "A Comprehensive Energy Analysis and Related Carbon Footprint of Dairy Farms, Part 1: Direct Energy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Carvalho, Glauco Rodrigues & Bessler, David & Hemme, Torsten & Schröer-Merker, Eva, 2015. "Understanding International Milk Price Relationships," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196692, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Kelly, E & Shalloo, L & Geary, U & Kinsella, A. & Thorne, F & Wallace, M, 2013. "An analysis of the factors associated with technical and scale efficiency of Irish dairy farms," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 2(3), pages 1-11, April.
    10. Philippidis, George & Waschik, Robert, 2016. "Removal of EU Milk Quotas Using a CGE Model with Imperfect Competition and Heterogeneous Firms," Conference papers 332682, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. David Hennessy, 2007. "Region marginalization in agriculture, seasonality, dedicated capital, and product development with reference to North Europe dairy sector," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 41(2), pages 467-486, June.
    12. Fabienne Femenia & Alexandre Gohin, 2009. "On the European Responsibility in the Agricultural Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Modelling the Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(10), pages 1434-1460, October.
    13. Helming, John F.M. & van Berkum, Siemen, 2008. "Effects of abolition of the EU milk quota system for Dutch agriculture and environment," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43966, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. McDonald, Roberta & Pierce, Karina & Fealy, Reamonn & Horan, Brendan, 2013. "PR - Characteristics, Intentions And Expectations Of New Entrant Dairy Farmers Entering The Irish Dairy Industry Through The New Entrant Scheme," 19th Congress, Warsaw, Poland, 2013 345713, International Farm Management Association.
    15. repec:lic:licosd:32513 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Jogeneel, Roel & Requillart, Vincent, 2008. "Removing EU milk quotas, soft landing versus hard landing," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43656, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. O’Brien, Donal & Shalloo, Laurence & Patton, Joe & Buckley, Frank & Grainger, Chris & Wallace, Michael, 2012. "A life cycle assessment of seasonal grass-based and confinement dairy farms," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 33-46.
    18. John Garvey & Gordon Sirr & Deirdre O'Shea & Fergal O'Brien, 2019. "Risk and Planning in Agriculture: How Planning on Dairy Farms in Ireland Is Affected by Farmers’ Regulatory Focus," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1491-1502, July.
    19. Rae, Allan N. & Strutt, Anna, 2007. "The WTO, Agricultural Trade Reform and the Environment: Nitrogen and Agro-chemical Indicators for the OECD," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 8(01), pages 1-22.
    20. Buysse, Jeroen & Van der Straeten, Bart & Claeys, Dakerlia & Lauwers, Ludwig H. & Marchand, Fleur L. & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2008. "Flexible quota constraints in positive mathematical programming models," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6640, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Heinz Peter Witzke & Andrea Zintl & Axel Tonini, 2009. "The Common Agricultural Policy SIMulation (CAPSIM) Model: Dairy Reform and Western Balkan Countries Accession Scenarios," JRC Research Reports JRC50411, Joint Research Centre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:200240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.