IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijamad/262511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Management of Saravan Sylvan Park Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming

Author

Listed:
  • Shirzadi, Somayeh
  • Sabouhi, Mahmood
  • Kenari, Reza Esfanjari

Abstract

The present study sustainable management of Guilan Saravan Sylvan Park was planned. The used method in the form of decision support model in three10-year period was studied for parks of various states and with considering the economic, ecological and social criteria during the years 2008 to 2038. By using hierarchical fuzzy analysis method, the reaching to an optimal level of economic, ecological and social simultaneously and as their combined utility values in various periods, decisions and different states of park is obtained. The results showed that in order to reach to an optimal level of purposes simultaneously, at the beginning of the first 10-year period implementation of ecological decision, at the beginning of the second 10 years period in three considered states for the Sylvan Park implementation of social, ecological and ecological decisions give the most combined utility value of purposes respectively. Results of stochastic dynamic programming showed that implementing the ecological decisions at the beginning of the first 10-year period, implementing the ecological decision by considering the second designed state of park at the beginning of the second 10-year period, and by applying the first designed state of park at the beginning of third 10-year-old period, the implementation of social decisions is desirable to achieve sustainable management in Saravan Sylvan Park. According to the findings, the implementation of these determined decisions can be useful and maximum of desirable use from Park potentials in the economic, social - recreational and conservation and sustainability of indigenous species problems, and reposit the park to the next generation with the best condition.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirzadi, Somayeh & Sabouhi, Mahmood & Kenari, Reza Esfanjari, 2015. "Sustainable Management of Saravan Sylvan Park Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 5(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijamad:262511
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262511/files/IJAMAD_Volume%205_Issue%203_Pages%20195-206.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262511/files/IJAMAD_Volume%205_Issue%203_Pages%20195-206.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Diaz-Balteiro & Carlos Romero, 2007. "Multiple Criteria Decision-Making in Forest Planning: Recent Results and Current Challenges," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Andres Weintraub & Carlos Romero & Trond Bjørndal & Rafael Epstein & Jaime Miranda (ed.), Handbook Of Operations Research In Natural Resources, chapter 0, pages 473-488, Springer.
    2. Cengiz Kahraman, 2008. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Fuzzy Sets," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Cengiz Kahraman (ed.), Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, pages 1-18, Springer.
    3. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    4. Cengiz Kahraman & Nihan Çetin Demirel & Tufan Demirel & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2008. "A SWOT-AHP Application Using Fuzzy Concept: E-Government in Turkey," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Cengiz Kahraman (ed.), Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, pages 85-117, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiménez, Mariano & Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar, 2021. "Incorporating preferential weights as a benchmark into a Sequential Reference Point Method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 575-585.
    2. Łuczak, Aleksandra & Kozera, Agnieszka, 2021. "A model to assess the development priorities of local administrations through the hierarchy of strategic factors," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 474-492.
    3. Reza Vaziri & Mehran Mohsenzadeh & Jafar Habibi, 2016. "TBDQ: A Pragmatic Task-Based Method to Data Quality Assessment and Improvement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Eric Sucky, 2006. "Kontraktlogistik—Ein stochastisch dynamischer Planungsansatz zur Logistikdienstleisterauswahl," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 131-153, June.
    5. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    6. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    7. Emmanuel Kazuva & Jiquan Zhang & Zhijun Tong & Alu Si & Li Na, 2018. "The DPSIR Model for Environmental Risk Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Dar es Salaam City, Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, August.
    8. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Lin, Sheng-Hau & Zhao, Xiaofeng & Wu, Jiuxing & Liang, Fachao & Li, Jia-Hsuan & Lai, Ren-Ji & Hsieh, Jing-Chzi & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2021. "An evaluation framework for developing green infrastructure by using a new hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for promoting environmental sustainability," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Guilan Kong & Lili Jiang & Xiaofeng Yin & Tianbing Wang & Dong-Ling Xu & Jian-Bo Yang & Yonghua Hu, 2018. "Combining principal component analysis and the evidential reasoning approach for healthcare quality assessment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 679-699, December.
    11. Hu, Mingming & Ren, Peiyu & Lan, Jibin & Wang, Jun & Zheng, Weimin, 2014. "Note on “Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations”," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(2), pages 771-773.
    12. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    13. Ngan, Sue Lin & How, Bing Shen & Teng, Sin Yong & Leong, Wei Dong & Loy, Adrian Chun Minh & Yatim, Puan & Promentilla, Michael Angelo B. & Lam, Hon Loong, 2020. "A hybrid approach to prioritize risk mitigation strategies for biomass polygeneration systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Paul, Swarup & Sarkar, Bijan & Bose, P.K., 2015. "Eclectic decision for the selection of tree borne oil (TBO) as alternative fuel for internal combustion engine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 256-263.
    15. Seung-Jin Han & Won-Jae Lee & So-Hee Kim & Sang-Hoon Yoon & Hyunwoong Pyun, 2022. "Assessing Expected Long-term Benefits for the Olympic Games: Delphi-AHP Approach from Korean Olympic Experts," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    16. Eklund, Patrik & Rusinowska, Agnieszka & De Swart, Harrie, 2007. "Consensus reaching in committees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 185-193, April.
    17. Denys Yemshanov & Frank H. Koch & Yakov Ben‐Haim & Marla Downing & Frank Sapio & Marty Siltanen, 2013. "A New Multicriteria Risk Mapping Approach Based on a Multiattribute Frontier Concept," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1694-1709, September.
    18. Ya-Ching Yeh & Chia-Chun Hsiao, 2012. "An Evaluation of Core Competence on Knowledge Management for Elementary Schools’ Teachers: A Case Study of Remote Rural Area in Taiwan," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 3(9), pages 303-312.
    19. Renaud, J. & Thibault, J. & Lanouette, R. & Kiss, L.N. & Zaras, K. & Fonteix, C., 2007. "Comparison of two multicriteria decision aid methods: Net Flow and Rough Set Methods in a high yield pulping process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1418-1432, March.
    20. Raimonda BublienÄ— & Irina Vinogradova & Manuela TvaronaviÄ ienÄ— & Salvatore Monni, 2019. "Legal form determination for the development of clusters' activities," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 1(3), pages 244-258, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijamad:262511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iraesea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.