IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijaeri/344334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption Of Agroforestry Technologies And The Welfare Of Arabica Coffee Farmers In Bukhura Parish, Bududa District, Eastern Uganda

Author

Listed:
  • Kibone Phionah
  • Buyinza Mukadasi

Abstract

Due to the declining productivity of coffee farms in many regions, there has always been a growing interest in agroforestry technologies as a way to improve the fertility of the soil, increase crop diversity, and provide other income sources to farmers. Much as there had been successful cases of agroforestry adoption in the study area, there was still limited evidence on the impact of these technologies on coffee farmer’s welfare. A study was conducted to assess the socio economic factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry practices and the welfare of the coffee farmers in Bukhura parish, Bumasheti Sub County, Bududa district. The findings REVEALED that the majority (80%) of the farmers practiced agroforestry in their gardens, of which they grew shade-providing trees such as Ficusnatalensis in coffee gardens is an important practice for the wellbeing of the coffee. The regression results indicate that the use of agroforestry techniques had a significant positive impact on the income generated from the coffee by the farmers. However, other factors; distance from the nearest coffee market and form of coffee sold also had a significant impact on the income generated from the coffee. The results also showed that access to credit, access to extension services and farming experience were found to have significant influence on the adoption of agroforestry practices among the coffee farmers in the study area. The key conclusions from the study are that credit facilities and extension services are key issues in promoting agroforestry among coffee farmers, and there is need to encourage coffee farmers to practice agroforestry since it had a positively significant impact on their incomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kibone Phionah & Buyinza Mukadasi, 2023. "Adoption Of Agroforestry Technologies And The Welfare Of Arabica Coffee Farmers In Bukhura Parish, Bududa District, Eastern Uganda," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(6), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:344334
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344334/files/ijaer_09__61.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah E. Castle & Daniel C. Miller & Pablo J. Ordonez & Kathy Baylis & Karl Hughes, 2021. "The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well‐being in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
    2. Dalemans, Floris & Muys, Bart & Maertens, Miet, 2019. "Adoption Constraints for Small-scale Agroforestry-based Biofuel Systems in India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 27-39.
    3. Mai Phuong Nguyen & Philippe Vaast & Tim Pagella & Fergus Sinclair, 2020. "Local Knowledge about Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees in Coffee Agroforestry Practices in Northwest Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-27, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azlan, Zulfadli Hazim Zul & Junaini, Syahrul Nizam & Bolhassan, Noor Alamshah, 2024. "Evidence of the potential benefits of digital technology integration in Asian agronomy and forestry: A systematic review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Beatrice Nöldeke & Etti Winter & Yves Laumonier & Trifosa Simamora, 2021. "Simulating Agroforestry Adoption in Rural Indonesia: The Potential of Trees on Farms for Livelihoods and Environment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Elisabeth Simelton & Tuan Minh Duong & Ella Houzer, 2021. "When the “Strong Arms” Leave the Farms—Migration, Gender Roles and Risk Reduction in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-30, April.
    4. Noeldeke, Beatrice & Winter, Etti & Ntawuhiganayo, Elisée Bahati, 2022. "Representing human decision-making in agent-based simulation models: Agroforestry adoption in rural Rwanda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Das, Prantika & Jha, Chandan Kumar & Saxena, Satyam & Ghosh, Ranjan Kumar, 2024. "Can biofuels help achieve sustainable development goals in India? A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Hajjar, Reem & Newton, Peter & Ihalainen, Markus & Agrawal, Arun & Alix-Garcia, Jennifer & Castle, Sarah E. & Erbaugh, James T. & Gabay, Monica & Hughes, Karl & Mawutor, Samuel & Pacheco, Pablo & Scho, 2021. "Levers for alleviating poverty in forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    8. Celia Burgaz & Vanessa Gorasso & Wouter M. J. Achten & Carolina Batis & Luciana Castronuovo & Adama Diouf & Gershim Asiki & Boyd A. Swinburn & Mishel Unar-Munguía & Brecht Devleesschauwer & Gary Sacks, 2023. "The effectiveness of food system policies to improve nutrition, nutrition-related inequalities and environmental sustainability: a scoping review," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(5), pages 1313-1344, October.
    9. Meine van Noordwijk, 2021. "Agroforestry-Based Ecosystem Services: Reconciling Values of Humans and Nature in Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Mensah, Edouard R. & Shinde, Nilesh & Kakpo, Ange T. & Djenontin, Ida N.S., 2024. "The human well-being outcomes of tree plantations in sub-Saharan Africa: A reassessment of evidence using longitudinal subnational-year data," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Razafindratsima, Onja H. & Kamoto, Judith F.M. & Sills, Erin O. & Mutta, Doris N. & Song, Conghe & Kabwe, Gillian & Castle, Sarah E. & Kristjanson, Patricia M. & Ryan, Casey M. & Brockhaus, Maria & Su, 2021. "Reviewing the evidence on the roles of forests and tree-based systems in poverty dynamics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Meredith Hovis & Joseph Chris Hollinger & Frederick Cubbage & Theodore Shear & Barbara Doll & J. Jack Kurki-Fox & Daniel Line & Andrew Fox & Madalyn Baldwin & Travis Klondike & Michelle Lovejoy & Brya, 2021. "Natural Infrastructure Practices as Potential Flood Storage and Reduction for Farms and Rural Communities in the North Carolina Coastal Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Sánchez, Andrea C. & Kamau, Hannah N. & Grazioli, Francesca & Jones, Sarah K., 2022. "Financial profitability of diversified farming systems: A global meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    14. Malan, Mandy & Berkhout, Ezra & Duchoslav, Jan & Voors, Maarten & van der Esch, Stefan, 2022. "Socioeconomic impacts of land restoration in agriculture: A systematic review," Ruhr Economic Papers 951, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Meine van Noordwijk, 2021. "Agroforestry-Based Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-8, July.
    16. Ricardo Vargas-Carpintero & Thomas Hilger & Karen Tiede & Carolin Callenius & Johannes Mössinger & Roney Fraga Souza & Juan Carlos Barroso Armas & Frank Rasche & Iris Lewandowski, 2022. "A Collaborative, Systems Approach for the Development of Biomass-Based Value Webs: The Case of the Acrocomia Palm," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, October.
    17. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Imbert, Enrica & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "A Socio-economic Indicator for EoL Strategies for Bio-based Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijaeri:344334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ijaer.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.