IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/155145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Wicked Problem of Promoting Sustainability by Means of Enhanced Biomass Utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Wubben, Emiel F.M.
  • Nuhoff-Isakhanyan, Gohar

Abstract

Promoting sustainability by boosting projects enhancing biomass utilization turned out to be a nested type of a wicked problem for the EU, if only for the unbalanced competition for (productive) land and diverse biomasses. Within the EU-scheme of Interregional collaboration it boiled down to develop a coherent set of very regionally specific projects each with a lasting sustainable impact. How to manage it? The EU promoted project development by using a combination of first top-down stratified invitations, and second bottom-up self-organization by the interested parties, backed up with light EU-coaching and basic facilitation, while requiring regional co-funding. It resulted in the ARBOR-project, which comprises of 15 actions, ranging from the realization of gas-grid injection from highroad-verges grass biogas-plants, via synergy park development, till of a city center biomass hub for woodstoves heating system.

Suggested Citation

  • Wubben, Emiel F.M. & Nuhoff-Isakhanyan, Gohar, 2013. "The Wicked Problem of Promoting Sustainability by Means of Enhanced Biomass Utilization," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-6.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:155145
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.155145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155145/files/_6_%20Wubben.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.155145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dentoni, Domenico & Hospes, Otto & Ross, R. Brent, 2012. "Managing Wicked Problems in Agribusiness: The Role of Multi-Stakeholder Engagements in Value Creation," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Wubben, Emiel F.M. & Isakhanyan, Gohar, 2011. "Stakeholder Analysis of Agroparks," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(2), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Waddock, Sandra, 2012. "More than Coping: Thriving in a World of Wicked Problems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carraresi, Laura & Banterle, Alessandro, 2015. "Agri-food Competitive Performance in EU Countries: A Fifteen-Year Retrospective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Dentoni, Domenico & Ross, R. Brent, 2013. "Towards a Theory of Managing Wicked Problems through Multi-Stakeholder Engagements: Evidence from the Agribusiness Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dentoni, Domenico & Ross, R. Brent, 2013. "Towards a Theory of Managing Wicked Problems through Multi-Stakeholder Engagements: Evidence from the Agribusiness Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Sauvée, Loïc, 2021. "Editorial: Special track: European agrifood business in transition towards social responsibility," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(2), March.
    3. Paul T. M. Ingenbleek & Domenico Dentoni, 2016. "Learning from Stakeholder Pressure and Embeddedness: The Roles of Absorptive Capacity in the Corporate Social Responsibility of Dutch Agribusinesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Simon R. Swaffield & Robert C. Corry & Paul Opdam & Wendy McWilliam & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1357-1369, November.
    5. Bos, Jacqueline M. & Blok, Vincent & Tulder, Rob van, 2013. "From Confrontation to Partnerships: The Role of a Dutch Non-Governmental Organization in Co-Creating a Market to Address the Issue of Animal Welfare," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-7.
    6. Janina Grabs & Graeme Auld & Benjamin Cashore, 2021. "Private regulation, public policy, and the perils of adverse ontological selection," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1183-1208, October.
    7. Barbara Pancino & Emanuele Blasi & Anne Rappoldt & Stefano Pascucci & Luca Ruini & Cesare Ronchi, 2019. "Partnering for sustainability in agri-food supply chains: the case of Barilla Sustainable Farming in the Po Valley," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Inghelbrecht, L & Dessein, J & Van Huylenbroeck, G, 2014. "The ‘wickedness’ of GM crop applications in the European Union," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 3(2), pages 1-3, January.
    9. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten, 2018. "Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 333-356, June.
    10. Daniel Schuster & Ivo Mossig, 2022. "Power Relations in Multistakeholder Initiatives—A Case Study of the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Rosa Misso & Gian Paolo Cesaretti & Immacolata Viola, 2013. "Sostenibilit? del benessere e responsabilit?," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1), pages 77-92.
    12. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Stefano Pascucci, 2016. "Cross-Sector Partnerships and the Co-creation of Dynamic Capabilities for Stakeholder Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 35-53, April.
    13. Domenico Dentoni & Carlo Cucchi & Marija Roglić & Rob Lubberink & Rahmin Bender & Timothy Manyise, 2023. "Systems Thinking, Mapping and Change in Food and Agriculture," Post-Print hal-04002011, HAL.
    14. Goeldner, Moritz & Kruse, Daniel J. & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2017. "Lead user method vs. innovation contest: An empirical comparison of two open innovation methodologies for identifying social innovation for flood Resilience in Indonesia," Working Papers 101, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    15. Zazo Moratalla, Ana & Paül, Valerià, 2022. "What is an Agricultural Park? Observations from the Spanish Experience," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Blok, Vincent & Sjauw-Koen-Fa, August & Omta, Onno, 2013. "Effective Stakeholder Involvement at the Base of the Pyramid: The Case of Rabobank," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(A), pages 1-6.
    17. Zondag, Marcel M. & Mueller, Elisabeth F. & Ferrin, Bruce G., 2017. "The application of value nets in food supply chains: A multiple case study," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 199-212.
    18. Vera Sadovska & Lena Ekelund Axelson & Cecilia Mark-Herbert, 2020. "Reviewing Value Creation in Agriculture—A Conceptual Analysis and a New Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Ami Carpenter, 2023. "Conflict: The Missing Ingredient for Sustainability in Complex Partnerships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Steele, Amanda J. Harker & Bergstrom, John C., 2018. "Tackling Wicked Problems in Applied Economics: An Application to the Bears Ears National Monument," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274843, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:155145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.