IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/hukrgr/253370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Substitution Of Traditional Animal Feed With Co-Products Of Biofuel Production: Economic, Land-Use And Ghg Emissions Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Popp, József
  • Harangi–Rákos, Mónika
  • Antal, Gabriella
  • Balogh, Péter
  • Lengyel, Péter
  • Oláh, Judit

Abstract

Growth in biofuel production has been accompanied by increased output of animal feed co-products from common biofuel processes. Co-product generation in early biofuel impact assessments was ignored leading to an overestimation of land requirements and GHG emissions. The output of feed co-products is relatively high in the USA and the EU due to the large share of grains used in ethanol production with high feed yields. Co-product yields are low for rapeseed and soybean used in the biodiesel industry. The ethanol industry in the U.S. and EU produces about 43 million metric tonnes of high-quality feed, however, the co-products of biodiesel production have a moderate impact on the feed market contributing to just 41 million tonnes of protein meal output a year. By economically displacing traditional feed ingredients co-products from biofuel production are an important and valuable component of the biofuels sector and the global feed market. Moreover, the return of co-products to the feed market has economic, land use and GHG emissions implications as well. The prospect of advanced biofuels is also analysed in this chapter. Giant reed is considered as a potential feedstock for advanced biofuels, however the advanced biofuels industry faces several challenges today including regulatory uncertainty. -------------------------------------------------------- A globális bioüzemanyag-előállítás exponenciálisan emelkedett az elmúlt évtizedben, mert egyrészt számos országban bevezették a bioüzemanyag kötelező felhasználásának szabályozását, másrészt folyamatosan nőtt a kereslet az alternatív üzemanyagok iránt. Ehhez hozzájárult még az enegiárak drasztikus fluktuációja, ráadásul a növekvő olajáraknál előtérbe került az energiabiztonság kérdése. A bioüzemanyagok még hosszú ideig a hagyományos folyékony motorhajtóanyagokba bekeverve azok kiegészítői, nem pedig versenytársai lesznek. Az élelmiszer-növényekre alapozott bioüzemanyag-előáállítás csupán átmenet a nem élelmezési célú biomassza alapú bioüzemanyag termeléshez. A jövőben nyersanyagként elsősorban a cellulóztartalmú mezőgazdasági melléktermékek – szalma, kukoricaszár, erdészeti, faipari hulladék – felhasználása jöhet szóba a lágy- és fásszárú növények mellett, habár az új technológia piaci bevezetése még várat magára. A növekvő bioüzemanyag-előállítással párhuzamosan a melléktermékek (ikertermékek) egyre inkább hozzájárulnak a gazdasági és környezeti fenntarthatósághoz. Ma a számítások még alábecsülik a melléktermékek szerepét a nettó földhasználat és ÜHG-kibocsátás alakulásában. Mivel a felhasznált nyersanyag egy része takarmányként visszakerül az állattenyésztéshez, az energianövények nettó földhasználata és nettó ÜHG-kibocsátása csökken.

Suggested Citation

  • Popp, József & Harangi–Rákos, Mónika & Antal, Gabriella & Balogh, Péter & Lengyel, Péter & Oláh, Judit, 2016. "Substitution Of Traditional Animal Feed With Co-Products Of Biofuel Production: Economic, Land-Use And Ghg Emissions Implications," Journal of Central European Green Innovation, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 4(3), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:253370
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.253370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/253370/files/01_Popp_et_al_43.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.253370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beckman, Jayson, 2015. "Biofuel Use in International Markets: The Importance of Trade," Economic Information Bulletin 262114, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Irwin, Scott & Good, Darrel, 2015. "Ethanol Production Profits: The Risk from Lower Prices of Distillers Grains," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 5, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harri Kalimo & Filip Sedefov & Max S. Jansson, 2017. "Market definition as value reconciliation: the case of renewable energy promotion under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 427-443, June.
    2. Dumortier, Jerome & Carriquiry, Miguel & Elobeid, Amani, 2021. "Where does all the biofuel go? Fuel efficiency gains and its effects on global agricultural production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    3. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Ram N. Acharya & Rafael Perez-Pena, 2020. "Role of Comparative Advantage in Biofuel Policy Adoption in Latin America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Stefan Renckens & Grace Skogstad & Matthieu Mondou, 2017. "When Normative and Market Power Interact: The European Union and Global Biofuels Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1432-1448, November.
    6. Taku Fundira & Giles Henley, 2017. "Biofuels in Southern Africa: Political economy, trade, and policy environment," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-48, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Taku Fundira & Giles Henley, 2017. "Biofuels in Southern Africa: Political economy, trade, and policy environment," WIDER Working Paper Series 048, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hukrgr:253370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrghu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.