IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/frrfes/316455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limits of coexistence: the development of “frugal” systems in agro-pastoral regions

Author

Listed:
  • Garambois, Nadège
  • Claire Aubron, Claire
  • Morsel, Nathan
  • Latrille, Myriam
  • Jallot, Lucien
  • Lhoste, Valentin

Abstract

Since the 1950s, the development of livestock farming in France has focused on a technical model aimed at constantly increasing the physical productivity of labour, to the detriment of value creation. A comparative study of four small agro-pastoral regions illustrates the consequences of this development model in the geographical context: falling numbers of agricultural jobs and an ebb in the share of grazing in the diet of flocks, resulting in underuse or abandon of the areas deemed most difficult, which has in turn led to closure of landscapes. Alternatives have, however, emerged, some of which seek to create more value through a frugal functional model based conversely on greater use of pastoral resources, promoting more sustainable agriculture. The limited development of these frugal agro-pastoral systems is analysed here, with the aim of identifying areas of competition and the limits of coexistence between agricultural development models.

Suggested Citation

  • Garambois, Nadège & Claire Aubron, Claire & Morsel, Nathan & Latrille, Myriam & Jallot, Lucien & Lhoste, Valentin, 2020. "The limits of coexistence: the development of “frugal” systems in agro-pastoral regions," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:316455
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.316455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/316455/files/Garambois2020_Article_TheLimitsOfCoexistenceTheDevel%20%281%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.316455?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danielle Galliano & Benoît Lallau & Jean-Marc Touzard, 2017. "Coexistences et transitions dans l’agriculture," Revue française de socio-Economie, La découverte, vol. 0(1), pages 23-30.
    2. Aubron, C. & Noël, L. & Lasseur, J., 2016. "Labor as a driver of changes in herd feeding patterns: Evidence from a diachronic approach in Mediterranean France and lessons for agroecology," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 68-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadège Garambois & Claire Aubron & Nathan Morsel & Myriam Latrille & Lucien Jallot & Valentin Lhoste, 2020. "The limits of coexistence: the development of “frugal” systems in agro-pastoral regions," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 311-337, December.
    2. Lecegui, Antonio & Olaizola, Ana María & López-i-Gelats, Feliu & Varela, Elsa, 2022. "Implementing the livelihood resilience framework: An indicator-based model for assessing mountain pastoral farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Pierre Gasselin & Nathalie Hostiou, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 173-190.
    4. Pradeleix, L. & Roux, P. & Bouarfa, S. & Bellon-Maurel, V., 2022. "Multilevel environmental assessment of regional farming activities with Life Cycle Assessment: Tackling data scarcity and farm diversity with Life Cycle Inventories based on Agrarian System Diagnosis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Felipe Gallardo-López & Mario Alejandro Hernández-Chontal & Pedro Cisneros-Saguilán & Ariadna Linares-Gabriel, 2018. "Development of the Concept of Agroecology in Europe: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Varela, Elsa & Olaizola, Ana M. & Blasco, Isabel & Capdevila, Carmen & Lecegui, Antonio & Casasús, Isabel & Bernués, Alberto & Martín-Collado, Daniel, 2022. "Unravelling opportunities, synergies, and barriers for enhancing silvopastoralism in the Mediterranean," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. Nadège Garambois & Claire Aubron & Nathan Morsel & Myriam Latrille & Lucien Jallot & Valentin Lhoste, 2020. "The limits of coexistence: the development of “frugal” systems in agro-pastoral regions," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 101(2-3), pages 311-337.
    8. Emma Soy-Massoni & Kathleen Uyttewaal & Núria Prat-Guitart & Elsa Varela, 2022. "Fire Eaters: Exploring Consumer Preferences for Labeling Extensive Livestock Products Providing Wildfire Prevention Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, May.
    9. Dayet, Alexia & Diepart, Jean-Christophe & Castella, Jean-Christophe & Sieng, Sreymom & Kong, Rada & Tivet, Florent & Demenois, Julien, 2024. "Can organic rice certification curb the pressure of the agrarian transition in Cambodia? A farming system approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    10. Plateau, Lou & Roudart, Laurence & Hudon, Marek & Maréchal, Kevin, 2021. "Opening the organisational black box to grasp the difficulties of agroecological transition. An empirical analysis of tensions in agroecological production cooperatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Gasselin, Pierre & Hostiou, Nathalie, 2020. "What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 101(2-3), October.
    12. Bjørnåvold, Amalie & David, Maia & Bohan, David A. & Gibert, Caroline & Rousselle, Jean-Marc & Van Passel, Steven, 2022. "Why does France not meet its pesticide reduction targets? Farmers' socio-economic trade-offs when adopting agro-ecological practices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Aubron, Claire & Vigne, Mathieu & Philippon, Olivier & Lucas, Corentin & Lesens, Pierre & Upton, Spencer & Salgado, Paulo & Ruiz, Laurent, 2021. "Nitrogen metabolism of an Indian village based on the comparative agriculture approach: How characterizing social diversity was essential for understanding crop-livestock integration," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:frrfes:316455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.