IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/frraes/276818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Les gens ne viennent pas voir la qualité de l'eau dans un ruisseau, ils viennent voir un paysage". Comment favoriser la fourniture de biens publics d'origine agricole en Europe ?

Author

Listed:
  • DARROT, Catherine
  • GIORGIS, Diane
  • BILLAUD, Jean-Paul
  • BOUDES, Philippe

Abstract

Cet article analyse les modes de confrontation des logiques professionnelles des agriculteurs pourvoyeurs de biens publics (BP) d’origine agricole et les politiques publiques conçues pour soutenir la production de ces biens. L’introduction resitue dans une perspective de plus long terme les caractéristiques de la récente entrée en scène de la notion de biens publics dans les négociations de la Politique Agricole Commune. Elle présente également les éléments méthodologiques sur lesquels reposent les résultats, soient des enquêtes de terrain menées en 2012 et 2013 dans quatre zones agricoles d’Europe (Pieniny en Pologne, Haut Var et Marne en France, Parc national d’Exmoor en Grande-Bretagne). Puis l’article se compose de quatre sections. La première section montre que la confrontation des logiques professionnelles des agriculteurs et des politiques publiques donne naissance à deux types de BP : les premiers, de nature spontanée et principalement observés dans les Pieniny et dans le Haut Var, sont produits par la logique systémique de production des agriculteurs indépendamment de l’existence d’un soutien public. Les seconds, observés principalement dans la Marne et dans le parc national d’Exmoor, sont le fruit d’une injonction coercitive ou très fortement incitative de la politique publique, et correspondent à l’expression d’une demande sociale qui ne rencontre pas nécessairement la logique des agriculteurs. Les BP spontanés se présentent en « bouquet » cohérent du fait de la logique productive systémique qui les génère. La seconde section montre qu’aucune situation n’est figée, certains BP passant d’une catégorie à l’autre selon l’évolution des identités professionnelles des agriculteurs ou des dynamiques de destruction/protection de ces biens portées par l’action publique au fil des périodes historiques. La troisième et dernière section systématise ces observations dans un schéma de synthèse et propose quelques enseignements tirés de ces études de cas quant aux politiques publiques les plus à même de soutenir respectivement ces deux catégories de BP.

Suggested Citation

  • DARROT, Catherine & GIORGIS, Diane & BILLAUD, Jean-Paul & BOUDES, Philippe, 2015. ""Les gens ne viennent pas voir la qualité de l'eau dans un ruisseau, ils viennent voir un paysage". Comment favoriser la fourniture de biens publics d'origine agricole en Europe ?," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(4), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:frraes:276818
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276818/files/03_Darrot.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276818?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaul, Inge & Conceicao, Pedro & Le Goulven, Katell & Mendoza, Ronald U. (ed.), 2003. "Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195157413.
    2. Denis Barthelemy & Martino Nieddu, 2003. "Multifonctionnalité agricole : biens non marchands ou biens identitaires ?," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 273(1), pages 103-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine DARROT & Diane GIORGIS & Jean-Paul BILLAUD & Philippe BOUDES, 2015. "Comment favoriser la fourniture de biens publics d’origine agricole en Europe ? Les gens ne viennent pas voir la qualité de l’eau dans un ruisseau, ils viennent voir un paysage," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(4), pages 625-652.
    2. Goldthau, Andreas & Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2012. "The uniqueness of the energy security, justice, and governance problem," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 232-240.
    3. Hugh Dyer & Maria Julia Trombetta (ed.), 2013. "International Handbook of Energy Security," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15019.
    4. Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, 2013. "Earth Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14673.
    5. Agnieszka Kozera & Małgorzata Dworakowska-Raj & Aldona Standar, 2021. "Role of Local Investments in Creating Rural Development in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-30, March.
    6. Wenbin Long & Sihai Li & Huiying Wu & Xianzhong Song, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The roles of government intervention and market competition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 525-541, March.
    7. Miloslav Machoň, 2017. "Global Public Goods: The Case for the Global Earth Observation System of Systems [Globální veřejný statek na příkladu Systému systémů globálního pozorování Země]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(3), pages 68-83.
    8. Gianluigi Cisco & Andrea Gatto, 2021. "Climate Justice in an Intergenerational Sustainability Framework: A Stochastic OLG Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Toleubayev, Kazbek & Jansen, Kees & van Huis, Arnold, 2010. "Commodification of science and the production of public goods: Plant protection research in Kazakhstan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 411-421, April.
    10. Allaire, Gilles, 2019. "Hommage - L’économie institutionnelle selon Martino Nieddu, lecteur du Temps des laboureurs…‪," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 368(April-Jun).
    11. Alessandra Cepparulo & Luisa Giuriato, 2012. "Global Challenges and Country-Specific Responses through Aid Financing of Global Public Goods," Working Papers in Public Economics 156, Department of Economics and Law, Sapienza University of Roma.
    12. Silvia Scaramuzzi & Sara Gabellini & Giovanni Belletti & Andrea Marescotti, 2021. "Agrobiodiversity-Oriented Food Systems between Public Policies and Private Action: A Socio-Ecological Model for Sustainable Territorial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-32, November.
    13. Yoshinori Nakagawa & Keiichiro Kobayashi & Ken Jimbo & Kazuhito Yamashita, 2023. "Proposals for the G7 Hiroshima Summit based on Future Design ~International Governance for Global Public Goods~," CIGS Working Paper Series 23-003E, The Canon Institute for Global Studies.
    14. Scherer, Andreas, 2013. "Legitimacy Strategies in a Globalized World: Organizing for Complex and Heterogeneous Environments," Papers 566, World Trade Institute.
    15. Raphael Bossong, 2011. "Public Good Theory and the 'Added Value' of the EU's Counterterrorism Policy," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 42, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel, 2011. "From ‘Club of the Rich’ to ‘Globalisation à la carte’? Evaluating Reform at the OECD," MPRA Paper 33053, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Wolfgang Buchholz & Wolfgang Peters, 2008. "Equal sacrifice and fair burden-sharing in a public goods economy," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 15(4), pages 415-429, August.
    18. Hielscher, Stefan & Pies, Ingo, 2005. "Internationale öffentliche Güter: Ein neues Paradigma der Entwicklungspolitik?," Discussion Papers 2005-5, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    19. Friedrich Schneider & Raul Caruso, 2011. "The (Hidden) Financial Flows of Terrorist and Transnational Crime Organizations: A Literature Review and Some Preliminary Empirical Results," Economics of Security Working Paper Series 52, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    20. Dany, Charlotte, 2006. "The impact of participation: how civil society organisations contribute to the democratic quality of the UN world summit on the information society," TranState Working Papers 43, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:frraes:276818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.