IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/351994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La réforme de la PAC et son importance pour les pays industrialisés

Author

Listed:
  • Josling, Tim

Abstract

CAP reform has important implications for relations with countries outside the Commity. As a result of reform, the EC has found it possible to negociate new rules on agricultural trade in the Uruguay Round of GATT negotiations. The MacSharry compensation payments are sufficiently decoupled to fit into an "allowable" category of domestic policies, protected from challenge by trade partners. Tying compensation payments to hectares used, rather than output, should decrease yields. Breaking the link between farm output and income support brings the Community into line with a number of other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Josling, Tim, 1994. "La réforme de la PAC et son importance pour les pays industrialisés," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 223.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351994
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.351994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/351994/files/ecoru_0013-0559_1994_num_223_1_4675.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.351994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josling, Timothy E. & Tangermann, Stefan, 1992. "MacSharry or Dunkel: Which Plan Reforms the CAP?," Working Papers 51121, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giardini, Giovanni, 1992. "The reform of the agricultural policy in the European Economic Community: an Italian farm simulation study," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000017587, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Rod Tyers, 1993. "The Cairns Group and the Uruguay Round of International Trade Negotiations," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 26(1), pages 49-60, January.
    3. Tim Josling, 1994. "La réforme de la PAC et son importance pour les pays industrialisés," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 223(1), pages 27-31.
    4. Tim Josling, 1993. "Agricultural Trade Issues in Transatlantic Trade Relations," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(5), pages 553-573, September.
    5. Alexandre Gohin & Hervé Guyomard & Chantai Le Mouël, 1998. "Éléments de définition d'une politique agricole commune pour le XXIe siècle [Promouvoir les rôles marchands et non marchands des agriculteurs européens ]," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 244(1), pages 22-31.
    6. Schrader, Jörg-Volker, 1993. "EG-Agrarreform und GATT-Vereinbarungen: Vom Leistungseinkommen zur Quasi-Rente," Kiel Discussion Papers 217, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Hervé Guyomard & Nadine Herrard & Chantal Le Mouël & Yves Le Roux & Thierry Trochet, 1996. "L'accord agricole de l'Uruguay Round et la réforme de la Politique Agricole Commune : éléments d'analyse et de prospective," Working Papers hal-01594019, HAL.
    8. Weyerbrock, Silvia, 1998. "Reform of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy: How to reach GATT-compatibility?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 375-411, February.
    9. Scoppola, Margherita, 1995. "Multinationals and agricultural policy in the EC and USA," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 11-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.