IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/330348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural land turnover in Ukraine: state, features and problems

Author

Listed:
  • Tretiak, Anton
  • Moskalenko, Anatolii
  • Tretiak, Valentina
  • Moskalenko, Valentyna
  • Tretiak, Nataliia

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine the state of agricultural land turnover in Ukraine after the lifting of the moratorium, its features and institutional problems that arose in the process of market turnover of land plots of owners of land shares. Methodology / approach. In the process of research, the authors used the following methods based on the dialectical method of cognition: abstract-logical – in the systematization of scientific publications devoted to the issue of the turnover of agricultural land, its state, features and problems that arose in the process of opening the market for the turnover of land plots of owners of land shares; analysis, synthesis, comparison – when analyzing and comparing the number of transactions with land plots over a certain period of time (sale of land plots by legal entities and citizens, inheritance, etc.), prices and areas of transactions; method of generalization – when forming theoretical generalizations and conclusions. In the process of work, official data of the State Service of Ukraine on Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre were used, namely: to display real quantitative and value (price) indicators of the state of agricultural land turnover in Ukraine. Results. According to the results of the study of the state, features and problems of the agricultural land turnover in Ukraine, it was established that such indicators as the number of transactions with land plots for a certain period of time, the price and the area of transactions are usually analyzed. It is established that there is no correlation between the average price of 1 hectare of land and the number of land plots and their size, which is due to the fact that the plots were sold at a price that was almost equivalent to the normative monetary value. The given rating of the activity of the agricultural land turnover shows that the data in the regional section are quite variegated. It is established that the prices for land plots do not fully reflect the ratio of supply and demand, and the implementation of transactions with land plots in the process of turnover creates an even greater parcelization of land use. In addition, on the example of the analysis of the transactions of the Uzyn Territorial Community of the Kyiv oblast, it was confirmed that the sale price of agricultural plots allocated in kind (on the spot) to the owners of land shares is almost equal to their normative monetary value. The analysis of the areas of land plots acquired by individuals and legal entities showed non-compliance with legal regulations. In particular, for individuals, the area of purchased plots exceeds the norm by 15–95 times and for legal entities – by 10–50 times. Originality / scientific novelty. The originality of the research lies in the fact that the above analysis of the activity rating of agricultural land turnover made it possible to ascertain the fact that the prices of land plots are not determined by the ratio of supply and demand, but are artificially formed at the level of the normative monetary valuation of lands. It is established that carrying out transactions with land plots in the process of turnover does not contribute to the rationalization of land use by agricultural commodity producers, but creates an even greater parcelization of land use. The study of interdependence confirmed the absence of a relationship between the average price of 1 ha and the number of sold land plots (r = 0.027) and their size (r = -0.407). Practical value / implications. The main results of the study can be used as an information foundation for solving the basic institutional problems of the agricultural land turnover in Ukraine after the six-month moratorium is lifted; to take appropriate measures to improve the gaps in the legislation in the context of the purchase of land plots in the “same hands” and to strengthen the requirements for experts to justify the market value of land plots in accordance with the current methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Tretiak, Anton & Moskalenko, Anatolii & Tretiak, Valentina & Moskalenko, Valentyna & Tretiak, Nataliia, 2022. "Agricultural land turnover in Ukraine: state, features and problems," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330348
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330348/files/12_Tretiak_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330348?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaoran Chen & Diego Restuccia & Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis, 2022. "The Effects of Land Markets on Resource Allocation and Agricultural Productivity," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 41-54, July.
    2. Xie, Hualin & Lu, Hua, 2017. "Impact of land fragmentation and non-agricultural labor supply on circulation of agricultural land management rights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 355-364.
    3. Laurent Piet & Romain Melot & Soukeyna Diop, 2021. "What drives competition on the farmland market? A case study in Brittany (France)," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(1), pages 60-96.
    4. Zhllima, Edvin & Rama, Klodjan & Imami, Drini, 2021. "Agriculture land markets in transition - The inherited challenge of the post-communist land reform in Albania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Laurent Piet & Romain Melot & Soukeyna Diop, 2021. "Corrigendum: What drives competition on the farmland market? A case study in Brittany (France)," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 48(5), pages 1251-1251.
    6. Britos, Braulio & Hernandez, Manuel A. & Robles, Miguel & Trupkin, Danilo R., 2022. "Land market distortions and aggregate agricultural productivity: Evidence from Guatemala," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Pavel Ciaian & Edoardo Baldoni & d'Artis Kancs & Dušan Drabik, 2021. "The Capitalization of Agricultural Subsidies into Land Prices," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 17-38, October.
    8. Andrew Adewale Alola & Gizem Uzuner, 2020. "The housing market and agricultural land dynamics: Appraising with Economic Policy Uncertainty Index," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 274-285, April.
    9. Evgen Dankevych & Vitalii Dankevych & Olexander Chaikin, 2017. "Ukraine Agricultural Land Market Formation Preconditions," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(1), pages 259-271.
    10. Jason Loughrey & Trevor Donnellan & Kevin Hanrahan, 2020. "The Agricultural Land Market in the EU and the Case for Better Data Provision," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(1), pages 41-47, April.
    11. Liesbet Vranken & Ewa Tabeau & Peter Roebeling & Pavel Ciaian, 2021. "Agricultural land market regulations in the EU Member States," JRC Research Reports JRC126310, Joint Research Centre.
    12. Jarmila Lazíková & Ľubica Rumanovská & Ivan Takáč & Piotr Prus & Alexander Fehér, 2021. "Regional Differences of Agricultural Land Market in Slovakia: A Challenge for Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Isenhardt & Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Tenant Favoritism and Right of First Refusals in Farmland Auctions: Competition and Price Effects," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(2), pages 302-324.
    2. Plogmann, Jana & Mußhoff, Oliver & Odening, Martin & Ritter, Matthias, 2022. "Farmland sales under returns and price uncertainty," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Zhou, Di & Hu, Yanning & Xie, Dongchun & Sun, Qiong, 2023. "Land resource mismatch and energy efficiency: Evidence from 243 cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Zhuo Wenjun, 2023. "Circulation Expectations, Farmer Trust, and Farmers’ Contract Choice Behavior," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Baldoni, Edoardo & Ciaian, Pavel, 2023. "The capitalization of CAP subsidies into land prices in the EU," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Shichao Yuan & Jian Wang, 2022. "Involution Effect: Does China’s Rural Land Transfer Market Still Have Efficiency?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Stefan Seifert & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Is there a risk of a winner’s curse in farmland auctions?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 50(3), pages 1140-1177.
    8. Gatterer, Markus & Leonhardt, Heidi & Salhofer, Klaus & Morawetz, Ulrich, 2024. "The legacy of partible inheritance on farmland fragmentation: Evidence from Austria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Li, Nicholas, 2023. "In-kind transfers, marketization costs and household specialization: Evidence from Indian farmers," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    10. Baomin Cui & Lingling Tang & Jianxu Liu & Songsak Sriboonchitta, 2023. "How Does Land Transfer Impact the Household Labor Productivity in China? Empirical Evidence from Survey Data in Shandong," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Hui Luo & Zhaomin Hu & Xiuping Hao & Nawab Khan & Xiaojie Liu, 2022. "Assessment and Comparison of Agricultural Technology Development under Different Farmland Management Modes: A Case Study of Grain Production, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Bradfield, Tracy & Butler, Robert & Dillon, Emma J. & Hennessy, Thia & Loughrey, Jason, 2023. "The impact of long-term land leases on farm investment: Evidence from the Irish dairy sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    13. Aragón, Fernando M. & Restuccia, Diego & Rud, Juan Pablo, 2022. "Are small farms really more productive than large farms?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Weiwen Wang & Jian Gong & Ying Wang & Yang Shen, 2022. "The Causal Pathway of Rural Human Settlement, Livelihood Capital, and Agricultural Land Transfer Decision-Making: Is It Regional Consistency?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, July.
    15. Wenjun Guo & Wei Zhao & Min Min, 2022. "Operation Scale, Transfer Experience, and Farmers’ Willingness toward Farmland Transfer-In: A Case Study of Rice–Crayfish Cultivating Regions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    16. repec:zbw:bofitp:2020_023 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Daymard, Arnaud, 2022. "Land rental market reforms: Can they increase outmigration from agriculture? Evidence from a quantitative model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    18. Kym Anderson, 2023. "Loss of preferential access to the protected EU sugar market: Fiji's response," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(3), pages 480-499, July.
    19. Ayala-Cantu, Luciano & Morando, Bruno, 2020. "Rental markets, gender, and land certificates: Evidence from Vietnam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Bruno Morando, 2023. "Subsistence Farming and Factor Misallocation: Evidence from Ugandan Agriculture," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 37(4), pages 570-598.
    21. Liu, Shouying & Ma, Sen & Yin, Lijuan & Zhu, Jiong, 2023. "Land titling, human capital misallocation, and agricultural productivity in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.