IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/314164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of agricultural producer price on sustainable food security in Africa – a system GMM approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kwaw-Nimeson, Enoch
  • Tian, Ze

Abstract

Purpose. Given the efforts towards achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for food security by 2030, this study investigates the moderating impact of public investments in agriculture on the agricultural producer price – agricultural sustainability nexus in 40 African countries covering the period from 2000 till 2019. Methodology / approach. In this study we used multiple regression techniques to explore a dynamic panel data model based on the one-step system Generalized Method of Moments (System-GMM). Proposed by Arellano and Bover and further developed by Blundell and Bond, the System-GMM estimator was preferred over other techniques because of its efficiency in eliminating the simultaneous biases that are associated with regression model estimations. Specifically, the one-step System-GMM was preferred over the two-step System-GMM for our estimation due to the efficiency of its optimal weighting matrices. Results. The study discovered that although the interactions between public investments on agriculture and agricultural sustainability amplify the positive impact of a set of explanatory variables on agricultural producer price to an extent, the impact on food security in Africa is insignificant. The study also discovers that the net effects of a set of interactive terms on producer price in the developing countries in Africa are slightly lower than in the least-developed countries. The weighted average food security index for the period under study was abysmal 44.54%, indicating moderate food insecurity in Africa. Originality / scientific novelty. In the context of food security literature in Africa, this study is the first attempt at exploring the agricultural producer price – agricultural sustainability nexus based on the moderating impact of public investments on agriculture with the Global Food Security Index (GFSI), a composite food security model developed by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). Among our study proposals it is a call for a detour from the current agricultural investment and producer price policies especially the current ‘one-size-fits-all’ regional frameworks which have proved to be less progressive and less transformative to more robust country/sector-specific frameworks that have the potential to better the fortunes of agriculture and improve food security. Practical value / implications. The current state of agricultural producer price in most African countries is ample proof that the role and importance of the producer price have been gravely diminished. Despite governments’ efforts towards improving food security, the evidence as presented in this study supports the fact that those efforts have not achieved much success. The study, which contains a number of recommendations, highlights agricultural producer price as a potentially important driver of agricultural sustainability and sustainable food security in Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwaw-Nimeson, Enoch & Tian, Ze, 2021. "The impact of agricultural producer price on sustainable food security in Africa – a system GMM approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:314164
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.314164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/314164/files/4_Kwaw-Nimeson_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.314164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Voronenko, Iryna & Skrypnyk, Andriy & Klymenko, Nataliia & Zherlitsyn, Dmytro & Starychenko, Yevhenii, 2020. "Food security risk in Ukraine: assessment and forecast," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(4), December.
    2. Cicowiez,Martin & Lofgren,Hans & Cicowiez,Martin & Lofgren,Hans, 2017. "A GEM for streamlined dynamic CGE analysis : structure, interface, data, and macro application," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8272, The World Bank.
    3. Jooryang Lee & Myoungju Koh & Gicheol Jeong, 2017. "Analysis of the impact of agricultural R&D investment on food security," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 49-53, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philly Ramoroka & Chiedza L. Muchopa, 2022. "Inter-commodity Price Transmission between Maize and Wheat in South Africa," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 57-63, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín Cicowiez & Juan José Galeano, 2019. "Construcción de una Matriz de Contabilidad Social para Paraguay para el Año 2014," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0251, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    2. Skrypnyk, Andriy & Klymenko, Nataliia & Tuzhyk, Kateryna & Galaieva, Liudmyla & Rohoza, Kostiantyn, 2021. "Prerequisites and prospects for sustainable development of grain production in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(3), September.
    3. Relwendé A. Nikiema & Sakiko Shiratori & Jules Rafalimanantsoa & Ryosuke Ozaki & Takeshi Sakurai, 2023. "How are higher rice yields associated with dietary outcomes of smallholder farm households of Madagascar?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(3), pages 823-838, June.
    4. Minjie Li & Jian Wang & Yihui Chen, 2019. "Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Sustainable Development Capability of Agriculture in Countries along the Belt and Road Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Cicowiez, Martin & Akinyemi, Opeyemi & Sesan, Temilade & Adu, Omobola & Sokeye, Babajide, 2022. "Gender-differentiated impacts of a Rural Electrification Policy in Nigeria," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Norman Aguilar-Gallegos & Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Pedro Pablo Cardoso-Castro, 2020. "Systemic Design for Food Self-Sufficiency in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Klymenko, Nataliia & Voronenko, Iryna & Nehrey, Maryna & Rogoza, Konstyantyn & Rogoza, Nataliy, 2023. "Risk assessment of shock periods and investment attractiveness of agroholdings of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.
    8. Sánchez, Marco V. & Cicowiez, Martín & Ortega, Araceli, 2022. "Prioritizing public investment in agriculture for post-COVID-19 recovery: A sectoral ranking for Mexico," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Sánchez, Marco V. & Cicowiez, Martín, 2023. "Optimal allocation of agriculture’s public budget can improve transformation and healthy diets access in Ethiopia," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1262-1280.
    10. Mirela Stoian & Raluca Andreea Ion & Vlad Constantin Turcea & Ionut Catalin Nica & Catalin Gheorghe Zemeleaga, 2022. "The Influence of Governmental Agricultural R&D Expenditure on Farmers’ Income—Disparities between EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Dibrova, Anatolii & Dibrova, Larysa & Chmil, Alla & Dibrova, Maksym & Нuz, Mykhailo, 2022. "Modeling the impact of mineral fertilizer costs on effectiveness of production and export corn from Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
    12. Cicowiez, Martin, 2018. "Time Use and the Care Economy in Latin America: A General Equilibrium Analysis," Conference papers 332950, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:314164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.